But the argument was not about how it works. It was about VUDA replacing CUDA (making easy ports possible). That is not true. The code is different. End of story.But it's not OpenCL. It's using the flexibility of Vulkan to execute non-rendering code. It's impossible to predict how it performs because it comes at the problem from a very different angle.
Linux is not "free". You're just paying with time, not with money. It's just a different way of paying. Money is better - that's why we invented it.You remember Mantle, how cool that was? It's called Vulkan now & is in your PC, probably. If we didn't encourage free alternatives, we'd never have Linux or Android.
Android is almost impossible to evaluate. As a client, you can't download Android and use it on your PC (well... you can, but it's pointless). On the other hand, Android is in the end the main source of income for Google.
Mantle was a joint venture of AMD and gaming studios. It wasn't a hobby project run by some bloke.
Also, isn't it funny that Mantle was mentioned next to claims that AMD is such a FOSS and Linux contributor? :-D
Last edited: