D
Deleted member 178884
Guest
I wonder how the performance improvement is in this refresh, my x299 board is getting curious : )
Processor | Intel i5-12600k |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus H670 TUF |
Cooling | Arctic Freezer 34 |
Memory | 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GTX 1060 SC |
Storage | 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500 |
Display(s) | Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w |
Case | Raijintek Thetis |
Audio Device(s) | Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D |
Power Supply | Seasonic 620W M12 |
Mouse | Logitech G502 Proteus Core |
Keyboard | G.Skill KM780R |
Software | Arch Linux + Win10 |
Improvements, lol. Last time Intel improved performance was with Sandy Bridge (and that was only because of much higher clock speeds). All we've been getting since is "optimizations".I wonder how the performance improvement is in this refresh, my x299 board is getting curious : )
System Name | N/A |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i5 3570 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte B75 |
Cooling | Coolermaster Hyper TX3 |
Memory | 12 GB DDR3 1600 |
Video Card(s) | MSI Gaming Z RTX 2060 |
Storage | SSD |
Display(s) | Samsung 4K HDR 60 Hz TV |
Case | Eagle Warrior Gaming |
Audio Device(s) | N/A |
Power Supply | Coolermaster Elite 460W |
Mouse | Vorago KM500 |
Keyboard | Vorago KM500 |
Software | Windows 10 |
Benchmark Scores | N/A |
Mostly the same. Except these Skylake X Refresh parts are on the 14nm++ process instead of the older 14nm+ that the previous Skylake X chips are on.
The 9900k is no improvement, x299 however will get a few gains here. The fact it's soldered is great and I'll upgrade my 7740x to a new skylake-x refesh chip at some stage - Threadripper isn't for me since I've already got a x299 board and skylake-x has better gaming performance since I don't want a dedicated gaming machine and a HEDT machine, why not have both in one? Threadripper is getting better for gaming but the price of the motherboards had put me off.Improvements, lol. Last time Intel improved performance was with Sandy Bridge
Processor | Intel i5-12600k |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus H670 TUF |
Cooling | Arctic Freezer 34 |
Memory | 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GTX 1060 SC |
Storage | 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500 |
Display(s) | Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w |
Case | Raijintek Thetis |
Audio Device(s) | Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D |
Power Supply | Seasonic 620W M12 |
Mouse | Logitech G502 Proteus Core |
Keyboard | G.Skill KM780R |
Software | Arch Linux + Win10 |
Because modifying anything required redesigned masks (i.e. additional costs).Why would they use a refined process and not taking advantage of including hardware security mitigations and increasing more the clocks like in Whiskey Lake or CF-Refresh?
System Name | N/A |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i5 3570 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte B75 |
Cooling | Coolermaster Hyper TX3 |
Memory | 12 GB DDR3 1600 |
Video Card(s) | MSI Gaming Z RTX 2060 |
Storage | SSD |
Display(s) | Samsung 4K HDR 60 Hz TV |
Case | Eagle Warrior Gaming |
Audio Device(s) | N/A |
Power Supply | Coolermaster Elite 460W |
Mouse | Vorago KM500 |
Keyboard | Vorago KM500 |
Software | Windows 10 |
Benchmark Scores | N/A |
Because modifying anything required redesigned masks (i.e. additional costs).
Processor | Intel i5-12600k |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus H670 TUF |
Cooling | Arctic Freezer 34 |
Memory | 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GTX 1060 SC |
Storage | 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500 |
Display(s) | Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w |
Case | Raijintek Thetis |
Audio Device(s) | Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D |
Power Supply | Seasonic 620W M12 |
Mouse | Logitech G502 Proteus Core |
Keyboard | G.Skill KM780R |
Software | Arch Linux + Win10 |
How would I know? Something to do with their bean counters, I guess.So if they did it with Whiskey Lake and CF-Refresh (the cheapest platforms), why not Skylake X Refresh? Where the customers are most likely to spend more.