• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel to Use 5-digit Processor Model Numbering with 10th Gen?

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,314 (7.52/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
A lot of us could be wondering how Intel could number its client-segment processors after the i9-9980XE, or the 9th generation Core in general, and hoping for a major branding change or at least a change in the model numbering scheme. It turns out, Intel will brazen it out with a 5-digit model number and stick to the current scheme. Going by this scheme, the successor to the Core i7-9700K could be the Core i7-10700K, for example. Intel jumped from 3-digit to 4-digit as it transitioned from 1st gen Core to 2nd gen as it ran out of 3-digit numbers with the Core i7-9xx. It's now running out of 4-digit numbers.

Evidence of 5-digit number surfaced when Thai enthusiast TUM_Apisak tweeted a screenshot of a UL Benchmarks Systeminfo page describing an unreleased Core i5-10210U, which is probably a mobile processor based on the 10 nm "Ice Lake-U" silicon slated for late-2019. With a nominal clock-speed of 1.60 GHz and "reported" speed of 2.10 GHz, the Turbo Boost frequency of this 4-core/8-thread chip is rated at almost 3.80 GHz. Japanese enthusiast Komachi Ensaka confirmed this with three other model numbers: i3-10110U, i5-10510U, and i7-10710U.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
422 (0.10/day)
Location
Hungary
System Name masina
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard ASUS TUF B550M
Cooling Scythe Kabuto 3 + Arctic BioniX P120 fan
Memory 16GB (2x8) DDR4-3200 CL16 Crucial Ballistix
Video Card(s) Radeon Pro WX 2100 2GB
Storage 500GB Crucial MX500, 640GB WD Black
Display(s) AOC C24G1
Case SilentiumPC AT6V
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX 650W
Mouse Logitech G203
Keyboard Cooler Master MasterKeys L PBT
Software Win 10 Pro
I'll just leave this here. ;)

1556605061747.png
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
5,578 (0.96/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k -> 12600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0 -> Gigabyte Z690 Auros Elite DDR4
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120 -> Custom Watercoolingloop
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz -> Crucial (8x2) 16gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480 -> RX7800XT
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb -> 2tb MVMe SSD
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television) -> Dell S3220DGF
Case antec 600 -> Thermaltake Tenor HTCP case
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
imo intel should release one celebratory "10K" cpu, which is a 7700k / 8700k / 9900k but with 10 cores 20 threads.
then for finally something ACTUALLY new start a new naming scheme.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (2.74/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
imo intel should release one celebratory "10K" cpu, which is a 7700k / 8700k / 9900k but with 10 cores 20 threads.
then for finally something ACTUALLY new start a new naming scheme.
no need for mainstream intel parts to go 10c.9900k is already overkill.They should stick to the ring bus design instead of using mesh or adding more dies.
Instead, 9900k should be an i7 and priced under $400 with 4.7GHz non-K variant available at ~$320.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,747 (6.05/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
System Name Tiny the White Yeti
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling CPU: Thermalright Peerless Assassin / Case: Phanteks T30-120 x3
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
VR HMD HD 420 - Green Edition ;)
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
Four clock states and the one these CPUs will actually run at most of the time, is 1.something. In other words slow as molasses.

But, at least you have a fancy number.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2013
Messages
2,186 (0.50/day)
Location
Deez Nutz, bozo!
System Name Rainbow Puke Machine :D
Processor Intel Core i5-11400 (MCE enabled, PL removed)
Motherboard ASUS STRIX B560-G GAMING WIFI mATX
Cooling Corsair H60i RGB PRO XT AIO + HD120 RGB (x3) + SP120 RGB PRO (x3) + Commander PRO
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 2 x 8GB 3200MHz DDR4 C16
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX2060 Twin Fan 6GB GDDR6 (Stock)
Storage Corsair MP600 PRO 1TB M.2 PCIe Gen4 x4 SSD
Display(s) LG 29WK600-W Ultrawide 1080p IPS Monitor (primary display)
Case Corsair iCUE 220T RGB Airflow (White) w/Lighting Node CORE + Lighting Node PRO RGB LED Strips (x4).
Audio Device(s) ASUS ROG Supreme FX S1220A w/ Savitech SV3H712 AMP + Sonic Studio 3 suite
Power Supply Corsair RM750x 80 Plus Gold Fully Modular
Mouse Corsair M65 RGB FPS Gaming (White)
Keyboard Corsair K60 PRO RGB Mechanical w/ Cherry VIOLA Switches
Software Windows 11 Professional x64 (Update 23H2)
At least Intel is ensuring their naming scheme isn't confusing consumers, if it isn't & still using 4-digit numbers, it'll sound like Nvidia's Pascal GPU lineup.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (1.16/day)
Four clock states and the one these CPUs will actually run at most of the time, is 1.something. In other words slow as molasses.
Flexibility of these -U CPUs has been one of Intel's biggest strengths. They're frugal in idle and very close to desktop counterparts under load. AMD wasn't able to match this yet.
Of course they're able to hold that boost for short periods of time, but in many use cases that's all you need.
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
17,810 (2.42/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
Four clock states and the one these CPUs will actually run at most of the time, is 1.something. In other words slow as molasses.

But, at least you have a fancy number.

These are all mobile parts, they normally have very low base clocks, so I don't really see the issue here.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
5,485 (1.04/day)
Four clock states and the one these CPUs will actually run at most of the time, is 1.something. In other words slow as molasses.

But, at least you have a fancy number.
When was the last time you used a skylake\cfl\kbl based CPU with these rated speeds?
In a proper environment, they usually clock very high.

But what am i saying, why would you miss an opportunity to jab another one into Intel
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,747 (6.05/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
System Name Tiny the White Yeti
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling CPU: Thermalright Peerless Assassin / Case: Phanteks T30-120 x3
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
VR HMD HD 420 - Green Edition ;)
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
These are all mobile parts, they normally have very low base clocks, so I don't really see the issue here.

My experience with that is that for anything more than light use these CPUs will not be very quick. I agree with you and @notb - its good for some use cases. But the impression you get with these CPUs is that they are 'lean', but fact of the matter is, for any prolonged, high load, they fall apart fast. Prolonged being anything more than a few minutes on end.

Good for business laptops and light office work / cloud based stuff. Not so good for, for example, gaming, any crunching workloads, and most other things that ask more than opening some pages and files. Anything you do in short bursts will probably work fine.

If I compare these specs to previous gen, such as the i5 8350U I have in front of me, the trend is clear: loss of base clock frequency to accomodate higher boost frequencies. I'm not so sure that is a positive trend. Already this CPU is erratic in its power and temperature behaviour. I have serious doubts if the overall performance is actually improving...

When was the last time you used a skylake\cfl\kbl based CPU with these rated speeds?

Today and for the last couple of years. I also have a Skylake HQ-quadcore for a personal laptop and its a world of difference. More consistent, less erratic, much better performance. Of course it also guzzles more power.

But what am i saying, why would you miss an opportunity to jab another one into Intel

Yeah I'm totally anti-Intel indeed :laugh:
 
Last edited:

dorsetknob

"YOUR RMA REQUEST IS CON-REFUSED"
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
9,107 (1.26/day)
Location
Dorset where else eh? >>> Thats ENGLAND<<<
Intel been there done that.( 80286 80386 80486)
then they name changed as they could not copyright/patent numbers
So Intel gave us the Pentium/celeron and so on
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
1,669 (0.78/day)
System Name Personal Gaming Rig
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Carbon
Cooling MO-RA 3 420
Memory 32GB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 ICHILL FROSTBITE ULTRA
Storage 4x 2TB Nvme
Display(s) Samsung G8 OLED
Case Silverstone FT04
So,
19980xe or 10980xe ?
Both sounds stupid.
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
1,042 (0.33/day)
Location
Pristina
System Name My PC
Processor 4670K@4.4GHz
Motherboard Gryphon Z87
Cooling CM 212
Memory 2x8GB+2x4GB @2400GHz
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1425MHz OC+, 8GB
Storage Intel 530 SSD 480GB + Intel 510 SSD 120GB + 2x500GB hdd raid 1
Display(s) HP envy 32 1440p
Case CM Mastercase 5
Audio Device(s) Sbz ZXR
Power Supply Antec 620W
Mouse G502
Keyboard G910
Software Win 10 pro
Intel been there done that.( 80286 80386 80486)
then they name changed as they could not copyright/patent numbers
So Intel gave us the Pentium/celeron and so on

You forgot 8086 :)
 
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
50 (0.01/day)
They should simplify and focus what people know.

Core i9 X90
Core i9 X80
Core i9 K90
Core i7 K70
Core i5 K60
Core i5 S40

Next generation,

Core i9 X290
Core i7 K270
Etc..

I9, i7, i5 = class
X/K/S/U = features
First number = generation
Last two digits = specific SKU
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (1.16/day)
My experience with that is that for anything more than light use these CPUs will not be very quick. I agree with you and @notb - its good for some use cases. But the impression you get with these CPUs is that they are 'lean', but fact of the matter is, for any prolonged, high load, they fall apart fast. Prolonged being anything more than a few minutes on end.
Most people don't apply "prolonged, high load" to CPUs on regular basis.
This is the compromise we make for mobile parts.

Frugal operation and high, rapid boosts are perfect for mainstream PC loads: browsing www, office suites, programming, analytics.

Gaming aside, what long, heavy tasks are normal people running?
The only thing I could think of is watching video. But that's why Intel invests so much in hardware decoders. :)
Good for business laptops. Not so good for, for example, gaming.
Good for business laptops, good for personal laptops, good for NUCs/fast embedded. I.e. good for many things it is advertised for.
Not good for gaming, not good for long-running computing, not good for servers. I.e. not good for many things it is not advertised for.
I9, i7, i5 = class
X/K/S/U = features
First number = generation
Last two digits = specific SKU
Looks bad and way too few combinations.
Intel utilizes 3 digits for CPU versions and adds a letter for variant. All of that has to stay. Generation gets a second digit, that's it.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,747 (6.05/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
System Name Tiny the White Yeti
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling CPU: Thermalright Peerless Assassin / Case: Phanteks T30-120 x3
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
VR HMD HD 420 - Green Edition ;)
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
Most people don't apply "prolonged, high load" to CPUs on regular basis.
This is the compromise we make for mobile parts.

Frugal operation and high, rapid boosts are perfect for mainstream PC loads: browsing www, office suites, programming, analytics.

Gaming aside, what long, heavy tasks are normal people running?
The only thing I could think of is watching video. But that's why Intel invests so much in hardware decoders. :)

Good for business laptops, good for personal laptops, good for NUCs/fast embedded. I.e. good for many things it is advertised for.
Not good for gaming, not good for long-running computing, not good for servers. I.e. not good for many things it is not advertised for.

Looks bad and way too little combinations.
Intel utilizes 3 digits for CPU versions and adds a letter for variant. All of that has to stay. Generation gets a second digit, that's it.

I've already said I agree on that, didn't I? :nutkick:

The key part of my post you omitted. These CPUs, especially for someone less in the know, give us the impression they run at super high clocks. In reality, though, these CPUs have been steadily losing base clock frequency with every new iteration. I ask the legitimate question of whether that is positive. Do you really need 4.5 Ghz and up for those basic office tasks?! Of course not. But you do need a high sustained base clock for some other tasks, gaming being one of them.

Bottom line, the super high boosts actually reduce the versatility of this type of CPU. Who cares if it can do burst workload half a second faster, especially in the segment they're meant for?

This is Intel applying a strategy to its product portfolio that isn't necessarily in our best interests. Lower baseclock U-parts, enable a selling point for higher baseclock performance parts. Do we really need that distinction just so we can have a U-stack that is closing on 5 Ghz?
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
245 (0.09/day)
Location
behind you
Processor Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard ASRock X399 Professional Gaming
Cooling IceGiant ProSiphon Elite
Memory 48GB DDR4 2934MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080
Storage 4TB Crucial P3 Plus NVMe, 1TB Samsung 980 NVMe, 1TB Inland NVMe, 2TB Western Digital HDD
Display(s) 2x 4K60
Power Supply Cooler Master Silent Pro M (1000W)
Mouse Corsair Ironclaw Wireless
Keyboard Corsair K70 MK.2
VR HMD HTC Vive Pro
Software Windows 10, QubesOS
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,999 (0.78/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
Flexibility of these -U CPUs has been one of Intel's biggest strengths. They're frugal in idle and very close to desktop counterparts under load. AMD wasn't able to match this yet.

Of course they're able to hold that boost for short periods of time, but in many use cases that's all you need.
Most people don't apply "prolonged, high load" to CPUs on regular basis.
About 5 years ago, you could buy an "ultrabook" and it would be just fine with surfing the web. Try the same thing today, with a XPS 13, Macbook Air, etc., and it will struggle quite a bit, while getting hot and noisy. This is of course not the computer's fault, but bloated web pages full of JavaScript.
"Close to desktop computers" would be a stretch, unless you mean like a low-end one, and most laptops can only do it in short bursts, and usually throttle more as they get hotter. Many laptops are also not that useful when not plugged in, which kind of defeats the purpose of a laptop in the first place.

Too bad most small laptops these days are flimsy and super-thin. :(

The key part of my post you omitted. These CPUs, especially for someone less in the know, give us the impression they run at super high clocks. In reality, though, these CPUs have been steadily losing base clock frequency with every new iteration. I ask the legitimate question of whether that is positive. Do you really need 4.5 Ghz and up for those basic office tasks?! Of course not. But you do need a high sustained base clock for some other tasks, gaming being one of them.

Bottom line, the super high boosts actually reduce the versatility of this type of CPU. Who cares if it can do burst workload half a second faster, especially in the segment they're meant for?
You raise some valid and very relevant concerns.
While CPUs (even desktop ones) do run at lower power states most of the time, the "base clock" represents the highest clock it should be able to sustain with all features enabled, and unfortunately, it seems like the increase in core count comes at a cost of base clock.

The way I view it is that too high variance between sustained performance and peak performance is bad, and it negatively impacts the user experience more than reflected in benchmarks.
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2012
Messages
274 (0.06/day)
almost as easy to understand as USB Gen 4.3 rev 2a subsection xy or w/e it is going to be called in the future
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,564 (1.77/day)
ICL isn't supposed to be 14nm though that naming scheme & number of SKU o_O
 

RMX

Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
26 (0.01/day)
5 digit model numbers to go nicely with their 5 digit pricing?
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
12,023 (1.72/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs, 24TB Enterprise drives
Display(s) 55" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
I'll just leave this here. ;)

View attachment 122031

Unbelievable, either these models have no cache, or turn off all other cores and their cache to reach boost speeds over 4Ghz, perhaps believable if they were talking about 3nm production that's mature.
 
Top