• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Possible Listings of AMD Ryzen 9 3800X, Ryzen 7 3700X, Ryzen 5 3600X Surface in Online Stores

Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
630 (0.22/day)
What games?
My 8600K at 4.9GHz paired with a GTX 1080 that is pushed to its limits barely keeps the framerate above 60FPS in AC Odyssey, how do you get 200FPS on every game?

Go read the post please. Also, your 8600k is not a 9700k, You have 6 threads with I bet are spanked on that game at 100%.

This people....

Simple fact you wasted money on a 8600k with 6 threads for almost 300€, makes no sense. I would stick to a 8400 or 9400f or just go i7 8700 non K route. 8600k has no place in the market. This is the kind of people I´m arguing with... geez.
 

M2B

Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
284 (0.10/day)
Location
Iran
Processor Intel Core i5-8600K @4.9GHz
Motherboard MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Cooler Master MasterLiquid ML240L RGB
Memory XPG 8GBx2 - 3200MHz CL16
Video Card(s) Asus Strix GTX 1080 OC Edition 8G 11Gbps
Storage 2x Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
Display(s) BenQ PD3200U
Case Thermaltake View 71 Tempered Glass RGB Edition
Power Supply EVGA 650 P2
Go read the post please. Also, your 8600k is not a 9700k, You have 6 threads with I bet are spanked on that game at 100%.

This people....

Your 9700K is 3x as fast as my CPU? I'm gonna kill myself.
 
D

Deleted member 178884

Guest
I found it, is called 9700k wich overclocks to 5,2ghz
That's called pre binned. Unless you stop talking smack and find proof 100% of 9700k's do 5.2ghz without shoving absurd voltages which will degrade the CPU within a year, second off not everyone is lucky on the silicon lottery not all CPUs do that and a rather low percentage will and that pre binned CPU would cost more than a regular one, much more.
paired with 4000mhz CL18
More proof you overpaid on a crappy bundle.
I´m rocking 200fps-240fps on every multiplayer game at 1080p and 144fps on every single player game.
Proof or get lost, and what settings? Low? Lol
 

M2B

Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
284 (0.10/day)
Location
Iran
Processor Intel Core i5-8600K @4.9GHz
Motherboard MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Cooler Master MasterLiquid ML240L RGB
Memory XPG 8GBx2 - 3200MHz CL16
Video Card(s) Asus Strix GTX 1080 OC Edition 8G 11Gbps
Storage 2x Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
Display(s) BenQ PD3200U
Case Thermaltake View 71 Tempered Glass RGB Edition
Power Supply EVGA 650 P2
Simple fact you wasted money on a 8600k with 6 threads for almost 300€, makes no sense. I would stick to a 8400 or 9400f or just go i7 8700 non K route. 8600k has no place in the market. This is the kind of people I´m arguing with... geez.

300€?
What are you talking about? I'm not living in your country.
8600K can be clocked 1.2GHz higher than a 8400, 1.2GHz is a lot of MHz, you know.
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
630 (0.22/day)
That's called pre binned. Unless you stop talking smack and find proof 100% of 9700k's do 5.2ghz without shoving absurd voltages which will degrade the CPU within a year, second off not everyone is lucky on the silicon lottery not all CPUs do that and a rather low percentage will and that pre binned CPU would cost more than a regular one, much more.

More proof you overpaid on a crappy bundle.

Proof or get lost, and what settings? Low? Lol

1- Almost every 9700k does 5,1ghz/5,2ghz without a problem and under 1,35v wich is more than safe. Go to overclock.net 9700k thread and surprise yourself. While you bots think that Coffee Lake refresh is just equal to Skylakle + higher clocks, It isn´t, Intel kept refining and that´s why you don´t need as high voltages as 8700k, plus no tooth paste.

2- I didn´t overpaid for anything, I got a good Samsung B-die 3200 CL14 Teamgroup ram and overclocked it to 4000mhz, you know, because z390 allows you to, unlike AM4.

3- Everywhere on youtube, go look for it. And who cares about ultra graphics on multiplayer? Black Ops 4, Quake Champions, Apex Legends, Overwatch, World War Z, etc I have more than 200fps with a 1080ti at 1080p on all of them, and not even using low settings on those. Do the research.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
2,715 (0.54/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600@80W
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling ZALMAN CNPS9X OPTIMA
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G400C9K@3733MT_C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Pulse 12GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 128GB, Kingston A2000 NVMe 1TB, Samsung F1 1TB, WD Black 10TB
Display(s) AOC 27G2U/BK IPS 144Hz
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Seasonic Core GC 500W
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 Ultimate 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit/Manjaro Linux
I'm always slightly anxious when I see statements like this one.
In your honest opinion 7nm can provide these clocks... because we've seen countless 5 GHz chips made with TSMC 7nm? Because you work for TSMC? Because you're a quantum physicist working on semiconductors? Because you had a vision on your AMD altar?

Jokes aside, I'm really curious where do people get this kind of knowledge.

Since Radeon 7 is the 1st product of this new 7nm process and it already goes close to 2.15GHz on water vs the 1.85GHz of Vega64 LC, we can safely assume that the Zen2 can gain at least the same 15% of headroom for their single-threaded clocks, so from the 4.35GHz of Zen+ we go exactly to 5GHz. Personally, I can see that later on we will see 5.1-5.2GHz turbo on the best binned Zen2 chips. As anyone can see in this post, all those numbers are based on simple math logic and not prediction based on personal preference. Any more meaninful questions?
 
D

Deleted member 178884

Guest
1- Almost every 9700k does 5,1ghz/5,2ghz without a problem and under 1,35v wich is more than safe. Go to overclock.net 9700k thread and surprise yourself. While you bots think that Coffee Lake refresh is just equal to Skylakle + higher clocks, It isn´t, Intel kept refining and that´s why you don´t need as high voltages as 8700k, plus no tooth paste.
1556909202608.png

"Almost every"
>11% do it at a greater voltage than you specified.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
42,609 (6.67/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
...do you honestly believe it would have been approved if the ACTUAL costs (before overruns) were known?

You can say the same about the F-22 the F-15, F-16, C-17, C-5. then.

And just so you know the operational cost of F-35 isn't nearly as much as the E-3.
Pilots are loving it it's also easier to maintain and plus just like the F4 in the past most parts are interchangeable between service branches and also Global units
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,821 (1.33/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
Beyond that we've already seen that even first gen Ryzen loses most of its latency issues with a decent kit of RAM. Consider that 'Ryzen overclocking' compared to Intel's hot mess at high clocks and they're even again, both in additional cost and additional performance.
That is actually one of the open questions on Zen2. IO Die should introduce additional latency. How much exactly and how it is handled we will have to wait and see.
 
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
406 (0.07/day)
Location
czech republic
System Name AMD forever, AMD overclocker
Processor Athlon 3000+ Venice, Athlon x2 4600+ EE Windsor,x4 955 BE@3.9GHz AIR, X4 965 BE, x4 970 BE, x6 1090T
Motherboard Asus C5F-Z, Asus C5F, Asus C4E, Asus C4F, Asus RIIIE, Asus R4E, Asus M5F, Asus M6F, Asus M7H,
Cooling Corsair H100, Swiftech H220, CM Hyper 212, Xigmatek 1283 DK+Ultra Kaze, CM V6GT, Noctua NHD14
Memory Kingston Hyper X, 1600 A-Data 2000x, Corsair Dominator GT 2000 MHz, GSkill TridentX 2400MHz, HyperX
Video Card(s) HD3870 512MB GDDR4, HD5770 1024MB GDDR5, ATI HD4870, HD 6870 GDDR5, HD 7870,Radeon R9-270X
Storage 2x 320GB WD+Samsung, 1x 500 GB Samsung, SSD X-25, SSD HyperX, SSD Seagate, SSD Corsair GT
Display(s) BenQ 24" 24XL
Case HAF 922, Aspire X-Cruiser, benchtable Wroom
Power Supply Seasonic 500W and Seasonic 650W, Corsair AX 1200W, Zalman Goldrock 750, Galaxy OC edition 1200W
Software x64 win 7 and x86 Win XP SP3
Benchmark Scores you rather I do not want to see .. :-D !!!Thuban coming soon, new secret Gigabyte mobo too !!!
All specs are based on old ADORE TV video and are fakes! Please update the news.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (1.16/day)
Since Radeon 7 is the 1st product of this new 7nm process and it already goes close to 2.15GHz on water vs the 1.85GHz of Vega64 LC, we can safely assume that the Zen2 can gain at least the same 15% of headroom for their single-threaded clocks, so from the 4.35GHz of Zen+ we go exactly to 5GHz.
It's not how semiconductors work. There's no magical scaling of frequency limits.

But whatever. This is not a physics forum.
In few weeks all will be revealed. I'm sure you'll be happy with (and able to defend) whatever frequencies Zen2 comes up with. :)
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
2,939 (1.15/day)
System Name System V
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-P
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 // a bunch of 120 mm Xigmatek 1500 RPM fans (2 ins, 3 outs)
Memory 2x8GB Ballistix Sport LT 3200 MHz (BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE) (CL16-18-18-36)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte AORUS Radeon RX 580 8 GB
Storage SHFS37A240G / DT01ACA200 / ST10000VN0008 / ST8000VN004 / SA400S37960G / SNV21000G / NM620 2TB
Display(s) LG 22MP55 IPS Display
Case NZXT Source 210
Audio Device(s) Logitech G430 Headset
Power Supply Corsair CX650M
Software Whatever build of Windows 11 is being served in Canary channel at the time.
Benchmark Scores Corona 1.3: 3120620 r/s Cinebench R20: 3355 FireStrike: 12490 TimeSpy: 4624
Ryzen 9 Box is fake since you see Ryzen 3 box cooler :).

And the typeface for the "9" is different.

Besides, isn't "Ryzen 9" actually where current Threadripper stands?
 
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
671 (0.23/day)
System Name Unimatrix
Processor Intel i9-9900K @ 5.0GHz
Motherboard ASRock x390 Taichi Ultimate
Cooling Custom Loop
Memory 32GB GSkill TridentZ RGB DDR4 @ 3400MHz 14-14-14-32
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080 with Heatkiller Water Block
Storage 2x Samsung 960 Pro 512GB M.2 SSD in RAID 0, 1x WD Blue 1TB M.2 SSD
Display(s) Alienware 34" Ultrawide 3440x1440
Case CoolerMaster P500M Mesh
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Titanium 850W
Keyboard Corsair K75
Benchmark Scores Really Really High
Since Radeon 7 is the 1st product of this new 7nm process and it already goes close to 2.15GHz on water vs the 1.85GHz of Vega64 LC, we can safely assume that the Zen2 can gain at least the same 15% of headroom for their single-threaded clocks, so from the 4.35GHz of Zen+ we go exactly to 5GHz. Personally, I can see that later on we will see 5.1-5.2GHz turbo on the best binned Zen2 chips. As anyone can see in this post, all those numbers are based on simple math logic and not prediction based on personal preference. Any more meaninful questions?

LOL. I love it. i've been burned by the AMD hype train for the first gen Ryzen. I thought it was going to be the second coming of AMD.
 
Joined
May 3, 2019
Messages
169 (0.08/day)
Have you seen any tests with fixed clocks? If not then go check them out, Zen is indeed only about 5~10% behind Intel clock for clock. So your assumption that AMD can't match Intel @4.8 GHz is BS, I bet you didn't even count the impact of smeltdown ~ hint it's non zero :rolleyes:
In synthetic benches they're very close but in real world like gaming at same clock speed intel is at least 15% better in some cases even more.

Just look at how the 2700x is dropping frames while the 9900k is almost consistent. Now add in the higher clocks of Intel and you get over 20% difference. It's also the reason why 2700x is bottlenecking the high end rtx cards
 

aQi

Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Messages
646 (0.20/day)
Where are the other specs ?
Set of instructions ?
Pci express support
Ram channels and speeds
Voltage?
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,371 (3.54/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
Not known.

Pcie 4.0

Dual channel - no idea of JEDEC

Will vary with every chip like all other processors.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,995 (0.78/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
They're less then 10% behind Intel in gaming now so yes it will beat or at least match Intel
I just want to point out that gaming is one of those workloads where the actual performance is not proportional to CPU performance, since it's about how bottlenecked the GPU is.

While IPC is absolutely very important for gaming up to a point, gaming performance (which in reality is GPU performance) is not a benchmark of the CPU. Even a 10% IPC gain will not yield a 10% improvement in gaming performance, unless the GPU is extremely bottlenecked. While most CPU bound tasks will scale "forever", rendering performance will not, they will scale until your GPU is no longer bottlenecked, and Intel is basically already there for current games, and Zen(1) is close but not quite there. Even with more modest improvements in Zen 2 than most of you guys expect, Zen 2 should still be able to come close enough in gaming to where it's probably good enough, and Intel will probably only retain a marginal symbolic lead (~2-3%).
 
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Messages
1,773 (0.60/day)
Location
NH, USA
System Name Lightbringer
Processor Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Enermax Liqmax Iii 360mm AIO
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB 32GB (8GBx4) 3200Mhz CL 14
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 5700XT Nitro+
Storage Hp EX950 2TB NVMe M.2, HP EX950 1TB NVMe M.2, Samsung 860 EVO 2TB
Display(s) LG 34BK95U-W 34" 5120 x 2160
Case Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic (White)
Power Supply BeQuiet Straight Power 11 850w Gold Rated PSU
Mouse Glorious Model O (Matte White)
Keyboard Royal Kludge RK71
Software Windows 10
This just makes me all the more depressed that I'll have to wait until 2020 to see Zen 2 in an MCM APU with a kick-ass GPU. Maybe I'll just get a 5XX-series motherboard and a used 2200G or something for my planned HTPC upgrade, and replace the CPU a bit down the line.

Still, the wait until the 27th seems very long right now.

Yeah, I really wish AMD would make a powerhouse APU....the finished product having similar package dimensions to a Threadripper CPU (hell, they can even use the same socket). Basically, I'd like at least 8 zen 2 cores, and enough GPU CUs to have no problem running AAA titles at 1080p and hit 60fps all day....itdbe a "guerrilla" means of threatening nvidia's lower tiers too. Don't want to get greedy, but 4-8GB of on package DRAM would be nice too, giving it a pretty big buffer before it has to start tapping into system memory.

Ive got all brand new hardware waiting to do a new build, have everythig except a videocard, but I just can't reward nvidia's avarice so I've held off...guess that's why I'm daydreaming about an APU that'd allow me to nix the videocard altogether
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
7,762 (2.78/day)
Location
Back in Norway
System Name Hotbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 110/95/110, PBO +150Mhz, CO -7,-7,-20(x6),
Motherboard ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax
Cooling LOBO + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14
Memory 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14 @3800c15
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UC@2250MHz max @~200W
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro
Display(s) Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary
Case SSUPD Meshlicious
Audio Device(s) Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Keychron K3/Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps
Software Windows 10 Pro
Yeah, I really wish AMD would make a powerhouse APU....the finished product having similar package dimensions to a Threadripper CPU (hell, they can even use the same socket). Basically, I'd like at least 8 zen 2 cores, and enough GPU CUs to have no problem running AAA titles at 1080p and hit 60fps all day....itdbe a "guerrilla" means of threatening nvidia's lower tiers too. Don't want to get greedy, but 4-8GB of on package DRAM would be nice too, giving it a pretty big buffer before it has to start tapping into system memory.

Ive got all brand new hardware waiting to do a new build, have everythig except a videocard, but I just can't reward nvidia's avarice so I've held off...guess that's why I'm daydreaming about an APU that'd allow me to nix the videocard altogether
An APU on TR4 would be rather meaningless considering that it lacks display outputs - you'd need some sort of PCIe card to provide the ports anyhow.

Other than that, I don't think you need TR4 for what you describe once we get DDR5. Ryzen 3000 already fits two CPU chiplets, just replace one with a GPU die and call it a day. If you want on-package HBM that's another matter.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,171 (2.80/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
I've been wanting to get a 16c machine. If this is true, I'll wait and not even consider Threadripper.
 
Joined
Oct 4, 2017
Messages
706 (0.27/day)
Location
France
Processor RYZEN 7 5800X3D
Motherboard Aorus B-550I Pro AX
Cooling HEATKILLER IV PRO , EKWB Vector FTW3 3080/3090 , Barrow res + Xylem DDC 4.2, SE 240 + Dabel 20b 240
Memory Viper Steel 4000 PVS416G400C6K
Video Card(s) EVGA 3080Ti FTW3
Storage XPG SX8200 Pro 512 GB NVMe + Samsung 980 1TB
Display(s) Dell S2721DGF
Case NR 200
Power Supply CORSAIR SF750
Mouse Logitech G PRO
Keyboard Meletrix Zoom 75 GT Silver
Software Windows 11 22H2
The problem with AdoredTV is he's such an AMD fanboy he does AMD more harm than good. .

These numbers were made up in this 'leak'

Stop spreading BS please !

1) Adored TV is far from being an AMD fanboy . He is an AMD fan indeed ( he has the right to ) BUT when it comes to his job he always makes very detailed and well though out analyses + he never hesitates to call out and criticize AMD on their bad products ( GPU's lately ) .

2) Adored TV doesn't make up numbers ! He is well respected within the PC hardware community ( he earned that respect ) as for example Hardware Unboxed gave him credits in their latest video and if that's not enough he got credits from AMD CEO herself ! Weird for someone who makes up numbers don't you think ? Yeah NO you like it or not he has real sources !


Should his words be taken as gospel ? Ofcourse NOT but fact is Adored TV always tries to verify and publish only the leaks who come from trusted sources , sometimes leaks are spot on sometimes they aren't .... saying Adored TV is an AMD fanboy or that he makes up numbers shows that you know nothing about the guy and his work so yeah......
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,731 (1.07/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
View attachment 122257
"Almost every"
>11% do it at a greater voltage than you specified.
I wouldn't waste your time, h
Yeah, I really wish AMD would make a powerhouse APU....the finished product having similar package dimensions to a Threadripper CPU (hell, they can even use the same socket). Basically, I'd like at least 8 zen 2 cores, and enough GPU CUs to have no problem running AAA titles at 1080p and hit 60fps all day....itdbe a "guerrilla" means of threatening nvidia's lower tiers too. Don't want to get greedy, but 4-8GB of on package DRAM would be nice too, giving it a pretty big buffer before it has to start tapping into system memory.

Ive got all brand new hardware waiting to do a new build, have everythig except a videocard, but I just can't reward nvidia's avarice so I've held off...guess that's why I'm daydreaming about an APU that'd allow me to nix the videocard altogether
Just one little problem, for that kind of GPU power you are looking at probably 150w at the least, with AMD anyway, add another 95w for the CPU/IO/Interconnects etc and you have a 250w behmoth APU that will need some serious cooling not too mention you couldnt fit such a GPU die onto even a TR size package, if you could we would have GPU's on a PCIE card the size of a small PCIE wifi/ethernet card
 
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
630 (0.22/day)
My 9700k does 5,2 at 1,31v full stable too. So there are 2 chips already doing it, yet you say I have no credibility? Also I said 5,1/5,2. I don´t know about a single 9700k that doesn´t do at least 5,1ghz with 1,35v. Not my fault that you can´t read properly.

Internet is full of AMD bots everywhere, because that´s trendy. People like to bash Intel and Nvidia, yet they still deliver the best products. Facts. Deal with it.

I will believe in AMD Zen 2 performance when I see it, as always. I don´t feed dumb rumours spreaded by the game guy that said Radeon VII would obliterate every nvidia card (AdoredTv). You believe in what you want. Let´s wait for the full release and then we can comment on the performance.

Stop spreading BS please !

1) Adored TV is far from being an AMD fanboy . He is an AMD fan indeed ( he has the right to ) BUT when it comes to his job he always makes very detailed and well though out analyses + he never hesitates to call out and criticize AMD on their bad product ( GPU's lately ) .

2) Adored TV doesn't make up numbers ! He is well respected within the PC hardware community ( he earned that respect ) as for example Hardware Unboxed gave him credits in their latest video and if that's not enough he got credits from AMD CEO herself ! Weird for someone who makes up numbers don't you think ? Yeah NO you like it or not he has real sources !


Should his words be taken as gospel ? Ofcourse NOT , sometimes leaks are very close to reality sometimes they aren't but saying Adored TV is an AMD fanboy or that he makes up numbers shows that you know nothing about the guy and his work so yeah......

He is indeed a fanboy. THe guy that said Zen+ would obliterate Intel in gaming because the IPC was up to 20% higher, and said Zen+ would reach 4,5ghz clocks. Short story, they reach 4,2ghz and that´s already a stretch, and IPC wasn´t that much improved. He also said Radeon VII would obliterate RTX 2080ti, but then he proceeds to delete the videos where he "preditcs" stuff.. ironic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
May 3, 2019
Messages
4 (0.00/day)
System Name Powerhouse
Processor R5 2600
Motherboard X470 Crosshair VII
Cooling Custom Loop
Memory 3600 C16 Trident Z RGB
Video Card(s) Radeon VII
Storage 1TB SX8200 Pro NVMe
Case PC-O11 DYNAMIC
Power Supply Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w
Mouse Roccat Tyon
Keyboard Corsair K55
My 9700k does 5,2 at 1,31v full stable too. So there are 2 chips already doing it, yet you say I have no credibility? Also I said 5,1/5,2. I don´t know about a single 9700k that doesn´t do at least 5,1ghz with 1,35v. Not my fault that you can´t read properly.

Internet is full of AMD bots everywhere, because that´s trendy. People like to bash Intel and Nvidia, yet they still deliver the best products. Facts. Deal with it.

I will believe in AMD Zen 2 performance when I see it, as always. I don´t feed dumb rumours spreaded by the game guy that said Radeon VII would obliterate every nvidia card (AdoredTv). You believe in what you want. Let´s wait for the full release and then we can comment on the performance.



He is indeed a fanboy. THe guy that said Zen+ would obliterate Intel in gaming because the IPC was up to 20% higher, and said Zen+ would reach 4,5ghz clocks. Short story, they reach 4,2ghz and that´s already a stretch, and IPC wasn´t that much improved. He also said Radeon VII would obliterate RTX 2080ti, but then he proceeds to delete the videos where he "preditcs" stuff.. ironic.

Right now, in May 2019 if you want high-end performance, you go Intel + Nvidia. Period. Will Zen 2 or Navi change that? I have no idea. I will rather wait and see, not spread "intel is done" kind of BS before the prodcuts actually release, just like AMD did with Nvidia volta by using the famous (now a meme) ad "poor volta". Laughable.

Okay, so possibly more chips can hit 5ghz than I originally thought.. If you take a look at Siliconlottery.com they tell you how likely each chip is to reach that speed.. They just updated it because the numbers were lower when I looked a while back..

I don't agree with that if you need high end performance you buy Intel and Nvidia. Maybe if you need "the best of the best." and even then, at 4k, Ryzen works just as good as Intel. I sold my entire 9700k @5.2 with a ftw3 2080 for a Ryzen build with a Radeon VII. I also went custom loop after I legit considered a 2080 ti.. I don't just game, though, and Zen WILL BE the better buy. 2% slower or not. Once I can get zen 2, it's a wrap. If you don't consider that high end then I just don't know what to tell you..

This isn't Bulldozer at 4.8ghz..

Not everyone is playing 1080p and need the most FPS they can get. Everyone knows the CPU matters less when going up in resolution.. The only GPU I would get at this point in time from Nvidia is a 2080 ti. AMD as of now just plain offers a better experience with their software and drivers.. On top of that they get better and better. And this is coming from someone who had a Vega 64, Radeon VII, 1080 ti, and 2080.. All of those being the highest of the highest end, unless you specifically need Intel for a certain task..

Zen 2 may not match Intels performance but if you really think it's not going to close the gap enough to not make a damn difference then you're just delusional. Also, even if AMD remains 5% behind Intel in preformance, guess what? The only thing Intel will be good for is gaming. That's it. Of course there's a few things/programs that benefits from each platform but even at 5% behind Intel it would be stupid to buy a more expensive processor with less cores for a 5% boost in only gaming
 
Last edited:
Top