System Name | "Run of the mill" (except GPU) |
---|---|
Processor | R9 3900X |
Motherboard | ASRock X470 Taich Ultimate |
Cooling | Cryorig (not recommended) |
Memory | 32GB (2 x 16GB) Team 3200 MT/s, CL14 |
Video Card(s) | Radeon RX6900XT |
Storage | Samsung 970 Evo plus 1TB NVMe |
Display(s) | Samsung Q95T |
Case | Define R5 |
Audio Device(s) | On board |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime 1000W |
Mouse | Roccat Leadr |
Keyboard | K95 RGB |
Software | Windows 11 Pro x64, insider preview dev channel |
Benchmark Scores | #1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99, back in the (P133) days. :) |
System Name | No Name |
---|---|
Processor | i7 980 @ 4.2ghz |
Motherboard | GA-X99M-GAMING |
Video Card(s) | MSU Gaming X 1070 |
Audio Device(s) | X7 Creative LE |
Mouse | Razer Naga |
Keyboard | K95 Corsair RGB Blue |
They are so desperate to tell people to wait for something they don’t even know is coming.That's too funny, Intel announces that it has new products coming, reveals zero details...
Best paper launch ever...
I have absolutely zero pity on Intel’s situations, this is a consequence they have spent over 6 years, essentially since Sandy Bridge, building up.
System Name | "IBT 10x Maximum Stable" |
---|---|
Processor | Intel i5 4690K @ 4.6GHz -> 100xx46 - 1.296v |
Motherboard | MSI MPower Z97 |
Cooling | Corsair H100i + 2x Corsair "HP Edition" SP120's |
Memory | 4x4GB Corsair Vengence Pro 2400mhz @ 2400MHz 10-11-12-31-1T - 1.66v |
Video Card(s) | MSI Gaming GTX970 4GB @ 1314 Core/1973 Mem/1515 Boost |
Storage | Kingston 3K 120GB SSD + Western Digital 'Green' 2TB + Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB |
Display(s) | Iiyama Prolite X2377HDS 23" IPS |
Case | Corsair Carbide 300R |
Audio Device(s) | Rotel RA-04/Cambridge Audio Azur 540R + B&W DM302/Cerwin Vega AT12 / Sony MDR-XB700 & FiiO E5 |
Power Supply | EVGA NEX650G + Silverstone Extensions |
Mouse | Always failing me.... |
Keyboard | Endlessly broken..... |
Software | Windoze 7 Pro 64-bit/Windoze 10 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | I had some of these once upon a time? Old age has seen me misplace them.... |
System Name | "Run of the mill" (except GPU) |
---|---|
Processor | R9 3900X |
Motherboard | ASRock X470 Taich Ultimate |
Cooling | Cryorig (not recommended) |
Memory | 32GB (2 x 16GB) Team 3200 MT/s, CL14 |
Video Card(s) | Radeon RX6900XT |
Storage | Samsung 970 Evo plus 1TB NVMe |
Display(s) | Samsung Q95T |
Case | Define R5 |
Audio Device(s) | On board |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime 1000W |
Mouse | Roccat Leadr |
Keyboard | K95 RGB |
Software | Windows 11 Pro x64, insider preview dev channel |
Benchmark Scores | #1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99, back in the (P133) days. :) |
Not 3900X but 3700X. AMD show 3700X beats 9700k at single core by 1% it totally mean AMD IPC outperform Intel IPC because 3700X boost only upto 4.4 GHz meanwhile 9700K has upto 4.9 GHz turbo. AMD having lower clock speed but match Intel.
System Name | "Run of the mill" (except GPU) |
---|---|
Processor | R9 3900X |
Motherboard | ASRock X470 Taich Ultimate |
Cooling | Cryorig (not recommended) |
Memory | 32GB (2 x 16GB) Team 3200 MT/s, CL14 |
Video Card(s) | Radeon RX6900XT |
Storage | Samsung 970 Evo plus 1TB NVMe |
Display(s) | Samsung Q95T |
Case | Define R5 |
Audio Device(s) | On board |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime 1000W |
Mouse | Roccat Leadr |
Keyboard | K95 RGB |
Software | Windows 11 Pro x64, insider preview dev channel |
Benchmark Scores | #1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99, back in the (P133) days. :) |
@lynx29
It may not be too late to get in on the stock, although buying on Friday would have been better as it's up ~10% today - Intel is down ~2%.
It hit >35 last September, today the portfolio is even better.
System Name | "Run of the mill" (except GPU) |
---|---|
Processor | R9 3900X |
Motherboard | ASRock X470 Taich Ultimate |
Cooling | Cryorig (not recommended) |
Memory | 32GB (2 x 16GB) Team 3200 MT/s, CL14 |
Video Card(s) | Radeon RX6900XT |
Storage | Samsung 970 Evo plus 1TB NVMe |
Display(s) | Samsung Q95T |
Case | Define R5 |
Audio Device(s) | On board |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime 1000W |
Mouse | Roccat Leadr |
Keyboard | K95 RGB |
Software | Windows 11 Pro x64, insider preview dev channel |
Benchmark Scores | #1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99, back in the (P133) days. :) |
I hope you at least get some decent interest on your savings, where I am it is ZERO %.
9900k, 9700k and 8700k will most likely still flat-out kill Zen2 in gaming and 9600k, 8600k and even 7700k will still beat it (except maybe in a couple most thread-heavy titles where they will be matched). I don't expect Zen to best 9000 series in gaming on anything less than 5nm EUV, which means series 5000 probably in two years...if everything goes well, lmao!I mean new HEDT series in Fall 2019 is big news I think, this is like X-series of x299 type processors right? they probably will throw 14nm a bunch of wattage to beat out AMD at the sake of more power usage. I don't know.
but 9900k or 9700k at 5ghz prob still beats AMD in most gaming situations other than 4k. we will find out soon enough with official benches, but the mere fact I am even typing this makes me sad... really was hoping for more than 1% gains on single core performance over 9700k... Lisa Su's powerpoint showed 3900x only beats 9700k at single core by 1%... i mean its nice they can finally match intel at IPC... I just was hoping for more. /shrug
9900k, 9700k and 8700k will most likely still flat-out kill Zen2 in gaming and 9600k, 8600k and even 7700k will still beat it (except maybe in a couple most thread-heavy titles where they will be matched). I don't expect Zen to best 9000 series in gaming on anything less than 5nm EUV, which means series 5000 probably in two years...if everything goes well, lmao!
5 Up to 14x AI Performance Improvement with Intel® DL Boost compared to Intel® Xeon® Platinum 8180 Processor when launched (July 2017). Tested by Intel as of 2/20/2019. 2 socket Intel® Xeon® Platinum 8280 Processor, 28 cores HT On Turbo ON Total Memory 384 GB (12 slots/ 32GB/ 2933 MHz), BIOS: SE5C620.86B.0D.01.0271.120720180605 (ucode: 0x200004d), Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS, kernel 4.15.0-45-generic, SSD 1x sda INTEL SSDSC2BA80 SSD 745.2GB, nvme1n1 INTEL SSDPE2KX040T7 SSD 3.7TB, Deep Learning Framework: Intel® Optimization for Caffe version: 1.1.3 (commit hash: 7010334f159da247db3fe3a9d96a3116ca06b09a) , ICC version 18.0.1, MKL DNN version: v0.17 (commit hash: 830a10059a018cd2634d94195140cf2d8790a75a, model:https://github.com/intel/caffe/blob..._models/int8/resnet50_int8_full_conv.prototxt, BS=64, DummyData, 4 instance/2 socket, Datatype: INT8 vs Tested by Intel as of July 11th2017: 2S Intel® Xeon® Platinum 8180 CPU @ 2.50 GHz (28 cores), HT disabled, turbo disabled, scaling governor set to “performance” via intel_pstate driver, 384GB DDR4-2666 ECC RAM. CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core), Linux kernel 3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64. SSD: Intel® SSD DC S3700 Series (800GB, 2.5in SATA 6Gb/s, 25nm, MLC).Performance measured with: Environment variables: KMP_AFFINITY=’granularity=fine, compact‘, OMP_NUM_THREADS=56, CPU Freq set with cpupower frequency-set -d 2.5G -u 3.8G -g performance. Caffe: (http://github.com/intel/caffe/), revision f96b759f71b2281835f690af267158b82b150b5c. Inference measured with “caffe time –forward_only” command, training measured with “caffe time” command. For “ConvNet” topologies, dummy dataset was used. For other topologies, data was stored on local storage and cached in memory before training. Topology specs from https://github.com/intel/caffe/tree/master/models/intel_optimized_models(ResNet-50),. Intel C++ compiler ver. 17.0.2 20170213, Intel MKL small libraries version 2018.0.20170425. Caffe run with “numactl -l”.
A standard FF with part swapping might eventually lead to better pricing for laptops. That'd be nice.utilize -> utility
I wonder what makes Athena 1.0 so special. I mean, laptops have never really had a form factor. If it is an honest form factor with part swap compatibility, Athena 1.0 could be major.