• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD's Upcoming $750 Ryzen 9 3950X (16C, 32T) Shown Beating Intel's $2,000 i9-9980XE (18C, 36T)

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.24/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
When we said AMD was readying a presentation on their Ryzen 9 3950X CPUs to awe crowds at E3, we weren't thinking of something of this magnitude. But apparently, it's true: a Geekbench test result has shown AMD's $750, 16 core, 32 thread Ryzen 9 9 3950X beating Intel's 18 core, 36 thread $2,000 i9-9980XE monster. Now, you may be thinking: ok, it beat it because of AMD's announced 4.7 GHz boost, and did so only on single threaded performance, obviously... but you would be wrong.

The Geekbench scores show AMD's Ryzen 9 3950X delivering 5,868 points in single, and 61,072 points in multicore workloads. Intel's i9-9980XE, on the other hand, scores just 5,391 single core, and 46,876 multicore points (on average and at stock clocks of 3,000 MHz base and 3,400 MHz boost). This is an incredible performance difference (particularly in the multicore score), and was apparently done with an engineering sample for AMD's upcoming chip that didn't even run at its announced 4.3 GHz base and 4.7 GHz boost clocks, but at 3.3 GHz and 4.3 GHz respectively. AMD's 105 W TDP, 16 core chip beats Intel's 185 W TDP, 18 core one... Where has the world come? Take the usual dosage of NaCl, and let's keep things in perspective - even if AMD's Ryzen 9 3950X equals, and doesn't beat, Intel's i9-9980XE, it's still a huge win for the red company. Almost as big a win as that huge stone on Lisa's hand.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Mar 22, 2011
Messages
214 (0.04/day)
Location
USA
System Name Liquid 2022
Processor Intel i7-12700k
Motherboard Asus Strix Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4
Cooling Custom loop with 9x120mm radiator area
Memory Team 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4@4133 C18-18-18
Video Card(s) Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 on Heatkiller block
Storage 10TB SSD: Samsung 970 PRO 512GB (OS), Samsung 980 PRO 2TB, ADATA SX8200 PRO 2TB/500GB, 4TB/1TB MX500
Display(s) Samsung 34" G85SB OLED, Samsung Odyssey
Case Phanteks ENTHOO 719 (grey)
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5, Logitech Z906 5.1 speaker system
Power Supply Cooler Master V1200, custom sleeved white cables
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Corsair K70 Lux RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (maybe 11 soon?)
I hesitant to believe this just yet. The 18 core Intel should be a least negligible faster than the AMD 16 core counterpart.
 
Low quality post by Konceptz
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
311 (0.05/day)
Location
Richmond, VA
Processor i7-14700k
Motherboard MSI Z790 Carbon Wifi
Cooling DeepCool LS720
Memory 32gb GSkill DDR5-6400 CL32 Trident Z5
Video Card(s) Intel ARC A770 LE
Storage 990 Pro 1tb, 980 Pro 512gb, WD black 4tb
Display(s) 3 x HP EliteDisplay E273
Case Corsair 5000D Airflow
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitec MK520
Keyboard Logitec MK520
Software Win 11 Pro 64bit
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 Multi 35805
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,436 (3.28/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
Geekbench does not scale well with cores. That being said, the 3950X should technically be faster per core by a little bit.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
324 (0.15/day)
I hesitant to believe this just yet. The 18 core Intel should be a least negligible faster than the AMD 16 core counterpart.
Why?
9980XE all core boost = 3.8Ghz Non AVX or 3.3Ghz AVX, so with the IPC advantage for the 3950X- it should only run at ~3.8Ghz all core on Non AVX - Magic right? :).
18C is only 12.5% more cores then 16C - same as the IPC advantage of 3950X + AMD's SMT give better performance uplift.
I do believe that Intel will bring back 20C,22C options to X299- same like it was on X99.
 
Low quality post by mouacyk
Joined
Feb 1, 2013
Messages
1,266 (0.29/day)
System Name Gentoo64 /w Cold Coffee
Processor 9900K 5.2GHz @1.312v
Motherboard MXI APEX
Cooling Raystorm Pro + 1260mm Super Nova
Memory 2x16GB TridentZ 4000-14-14-28-2T @1.6v
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 LiquidX Barrow 3015MHz @1.1v
Storage 660P 1TB, 860 QVO 2TB
Display(s) LG C1 + Predator XB1 QHD
Case Open Benchtable V2
Audio Device(s) SB X-Fi
Power Supply MSI A1000G
Mouse G502
Keyboard G815
Software Gentoo/Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Always only ever very fast
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
2,918 (1.15/day)
System Name System V
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-P
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 // a bunch of 120 mm Xigmatek 1500 RPM fans (2 ins, 3 outs)
Memory 2x8GB Ballistix Sport LT 3200 MHz (BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE) (CL16-18-18-36)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte AORUS Radeon RX 580 8 GB
Storage SHFS37A240G / DT01ACA200 / ST10000VN0008 / ST8000VN004 / SA400S37960G / SNV21000G / NM620 2TB
Display(s) LG 22MP55 IPS Display
Case NZXT Source 210
Audio Device(s) Logitech G430 Headset
Power Supply Corsair CX650M
Software Whatever build of Windows 11 is being served in Canary channel at the time.
Benchmark Scores Corona 1.3: 3120620 r/s Cinebench R20: 3355 FireStrike: 12490 TimeSpy: 4624
AMD's multiyear bets are paying off
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,332 (1.18/day)
Location
North East Ohio, USA
System Name My Ryzen 7 7700X Super Computer
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling DeepCool AK620 with Arctic Silver 5
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO DDR5 EXPO (CL30)
Video Card(s) XFX AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Storage Samsung 980 EVO 1 TB NVMe SSD (System Drive), Samsung 970 EVO 500 GB NVMe SSD (Game Drive)
Display(s) Acer Nitro XV272U (DisplayPort) and Acer Nitro XV270U (DisplayPort)
Case Lian Li LANCOOL II MESH C
Audio Device(s) On-Board Sound / Sony WH-XB910N Bluetooth Headphones
Power Supply MSI A850GF
Mouse Logitech M705
Keyboard Steelseries
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/liwjs3
I'm not saying that I'm a fanboy but I don't consider GeekBench scores to be very valid. With that said, I'm really not surprised that AMD is kicking Intel's ass; they have after all been sleeping at the switch for so long and more than likely all the exploit fixes have eaten into Intel's performance lead.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2018
Messages
584 (0.26/day)
I do believe that Intel will bring back 20C,22C options to X299- same like it was on X99.
They can't.

HCC tops up at those 18 cores.
For anything higher they need XCC



Those dies are absolutely ginormous, and do not fit on the LGA 2066, they need LGA 3647, meaning ... new boards.
Yep, that's the monster Xeon W-3175X and those "sell your kidney" ultra-expensive LGA 3647 boards...

They aren't going to compete with AMD's tiny chiplets with that ...
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
4,664 (0.77/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 5800X3D
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 6600 8 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
This benchmark isn't so good for this kind of comparison, IMO: not taxing enough for this many cores / threads.

Perhaps a better comparison would be something like CB R20 (R15 may be too fast as well to properly tax these CPUs), with MCE and XFR / PBO enabled, matched RAM and a very good CPU cooler, and then let them perform with a window of HWinfo opened with the relevant sensor tab, in order to find out, in real time, max clocks / sustained clocks / power usage during the bench run.

Any benchmark that scales well with cores and isn't "lightning fast" should work as well.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2017
Messages
75 (0.03/day)
This benchmark isn't so good for this kind of comparison, IMO: not taxing enough for this many cores / threads.

Perhaps a better comparison would be something like CB R20 (R15 may be too fast as well to properly tax these CPUs), with MCE and XFR / PBO enabled, matched RAM and a very good CPU cooler, and then let them perform with a window of HWinfo opened with the relevant sensor tab, in order to find out, in real time, max clocks / sustained clocks / power usage during the bench run.

Any benchmark that scales well with cores and isn't "lightning fast" should work as well.

Maybe the result will be far worse for the Intel cpu as the Amd cpu was not running at its announced best boost?
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,987 (0.78/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
Geekbench and Cinebench, the kings of benchmarks… :rolleyes:
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
1,568 (0.65/day)
Location
London, UK
This benchmark isn't so good for this kind of comparison, IMO: not taxing enough for this many cores / threads.

I guess some people want the hype to continue hehe

Lisa, Monday e3 10 June, as amazed as it was, published very dignified charts and in those charts 9900k won x 3900x in some games. So even Lisa, AMD CEO is cautious about the hype.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
324 (0.15/day)
They can't.

HCC tops up at those 18 cores.
For anything higher they need XCC



Those dies are absolutely ginormous, and do not fit on the LGA 2066, they need LGA 3647, meaning ... new boards.
Yep, that's the monster Xeon W-3175X and those "sell your kidney" ultra-expensive LGA 3647 boards...

They aren't going to compete with AMD's tiny chiplets with that ...
Then they are truly F**ed :) .
Looks like they are going for the large socket, they offer 8~28C and actually the prices looking good compared to current EPYC. :
This board looks nice at $499:
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
4,664 (0.77/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 5800X3D
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 6600 8 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
Maybe the result will be far worse for the Intel cpu as the Amd cpu was not running at its announced best boost?

Question: What were the conditions of the test, from both camps?

- cooler(s) used?
- RAM used and it's parameters?
- MCE and XFR / PBO enabled?
- mitigations used?

I'm proposing best possible scenario under non-manual OC, meaning very good CPU cooling, RAM @ matching parameters, MCE and XFR / PBO enabled and mitigations disabled.
 
Joined
Jan 30, 2018
Messages
225 (0.09/day)
System Name Dreamstation2
Processor Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus
Cooling Hyper 212 Black Edition
Memory Kingston HyperX 32GB DDR4 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Aorus 2080 Ti Turbo (sounds like a vaccum cleaner at full load)
Storage 2 x 1TB M.2 NVME + 1TB 2.5" SSD
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey G7 32" 4k
Case NZXT H500i
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar U3 / Audio-Technica ATH-M50x / Edifier R1855DB
Power Supply Corsair TX650M
Mouse Corsair Scimitar Pro RGB
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
As already mentioned on this thread, geekbench isn't exactly a measure of real world performance. But the AMD fan (not fanboy) in me wants this to be at least partly true, so I can re-edit my first PC's composition - AMD processor, Nvidia (nVidia at the time) graphics.

Not sure if I'm getting the expectations right, but drooling at the 3700 or 3600X to replace my current i5-4690K (workload is 50% gaming, 20% CAD work, 30% image and video editing, so I need a CPU that performs well in all areas).
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2017
Messages
575 (0.21/day)
Is it really that hard to use an actual real world application to demonstrate actual CPU performance? I rather they use Blender as a standard test to measure CPU performance (which is used by Intel and AMD) than Cinebench and Geekbench and whatever synthetic suites out there. It’s as relevant as testing games in 480p low settings with dual Titan RTXs. I mean Intel might as well do that to combat against AMD’s obsession with Cinebench and you’ll probably see a double standard from the fanboys claiming how Intel is bad AMD is good.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2017
Messages
75 (0.03/day)
Question: What were the conditions of the test, from both camps?

- cooler(s) used?
- RAM used and it's parameters?
- MCE and XFR / PBO enabled?
- mitigations used?

I'm proposing best possible scenario under non-manual OC, meaning very good CPU cooling, RAM @ matching parameters, MCE and XFR / PBO enabled and mitigations disabled.

Yes I agree, all those considerstions being taken.
 

bszalman

New Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Messages
3 (0.00/day)
Maybe:
Intel per core score = 46876 / 18 = 2604.2

%Different clock = ((4300 - 3400) / 3400) * 100 = 26.5%

AMD score = (16*per core + 26.5% value) + 15% IPC claims
= 41667.2 + 11041.8 + 7906.4
= 60615.4
 

phill

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 8, 2011
Messages
16,909 (3.44/day)
Location
Somerset, UK
System Name Not so complete or overkill - There are others!! Just no room to put! :D
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Motherboard Asus Zenith 2 Extreme Alpha
Cooling Lots!! Dual GTX 560 rads with D5 pumps for each rad. One rad for each component
Memory Viper Steel 4 x 16GB DDR4 3600MHz not sure on the timings... Probably still at 2667!! :(
Video Card(s) Asus Strix 3090 with front and rear active full cover water blocks
Storage I'm bound to forget something here - 250GB OS, 2 x 1TB NVME, 2 x 1TB SSD, 4TB SSD, 2 x 8TB HD etc...
Display(s) 3 x Dell 27" S2721DGFA @ 7680 x 1440P @ 144Hz or 165Hz - working on it!!
Case The big Thermaltake that looks like a Case Mods
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA 1600W T2
Mouse Corsair thingy
Keyboard Razer something or other....
VR HMD No headset yet
Software Windows 11 OS... Not a fan!!
Benchmark Scores I've actually never benched it!! Too busy with WCG and FAH and not gaming! :( :( Not OC'd it!! :(
I'm just waiting and really looking forward to the reviews. All these 'leaked' benchmarks are great but I prefer the hard evidence instead :)
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
6,881 (1.47/day)
Location
Florida
System Name natr0n-PC
Processor Ryzen 5950x-5600x | 9600k
Motherboard B450 AORUS M | Z390 UD
Cooling EK AIO 360 - 6 fan action | AIO
Memory Patriot - Viper Steel DDR4 (B-Die)(4x8GB) | Samsung DDR4 (4x8GB)
Video Card(s) EVGA 3070ti FTW
Storage Various
Display(s) Pixio PX279 Prime
Case Thermaltake Level 20 VT | Black bench
Audio Device(s) LOXJIE D10 + Kinter Amp + 6 Bookshelf Speakers Sony+JVC+Sony
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex III ARGB 80+ Gold 650W | EVGA 700 Gold
Software XP/7/8.1/10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.x86.fr/79kuh6
We just need more multi-threaded programs/apps/games to really enjoy all these cores.
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
62 (0.01/day)
You thinking that constitutes any sort of evidence and warrants defense makes you an AMD fanboy and just as bad.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top