• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Patent Shines Raytraced Light on Post-Navi Plans

Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,422 (6.03/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
That's too much. I was looking for the link. This is probably the best one:
https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/baaqb0

Well. I stand corrected then, was 5-7% over that :)

126036


There's also no 'magical' ray-tracing hardware or software improvements.

Ironically there is, we call it rasterization :D Pre cooked RT sans the real time part ;)
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,746 (1.32/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
I didn't miss it. I simply disagree with you having one benchmark from a game conclude about the value and performance of a graphics card.
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark results at 1440p had RTX 2070 Super at 11% faster than RTX 2070. TPU's RTX 2070 Super review puts it at 13% faster. I would say the estimation was not too far off. Price point is the same, we knew that before.

AMD's slide shows RX 5700XT being 5.8% faster on average than RTX 2070.

Edit:
Actually, we can do better than that. This is the RX5700XT vs RTX 2070 slide:
The following games and relative performance numbers are on the slide:
  • AC: Odyssey: +2%
  • Battlefield 5: +22%
  • Call of Duty: Black Ops 4: +6%
  • Far Cry: New Dawn: +5%
  • Metro Exodus: +15%
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider: -3%
  • Civilization 6: -1%
  • The Division 2: +3%
  • Witcher 3: +5%
  • Ghost Recon Wildlands: +4%

TPU RTX 2070 Super review has 6 of these games with results for RTX 2070 and RTX 2070 Super:
RTX 2070RTX 2070 SuperRX 5700 XT (calculated based on slide)Calculated RX 5700 XT VS RTX 2070Calculated RX 5700 XT VS RTX2070 Super
AC: Odyssey51.757.952.72%-9%
Battlefield 598.1109.8119.722%9%
Metro Exodus75.886.487.215%1%
Shadow of Tomb Raider83.094.180.5-3%-14%
Civilization 6113.4129.4112.3-1%-13%
Witcher 386.0100.290.35%-10%

Out of these 6 games, that would be -6% difference. RX 5700 XT is priced at 449$ vs RTX2070 Super's $499 - 10% cheaper.
RX 5700XT should be slightly better perf/$.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
27,676 (6.66/day)
If I were an AMD fan I would skip the Radeon RX 5XXX generation altogether
This would indeed be foolish. Radeon 7 is inbtween 2070 and 2080 generally performance wise and the Radeon 5700XT improves upon that. The 5800(XT?) and 5900(XT?) are going to firmly leverage the 2080 to 2080ti performance range and do for less money...

since AMD is again dedicating most of its resources to next-gen MS/Sony consoles with HW accelerated Ray Tracing while gamers will receive half-baked products which will be rendered obsolete less than a year from now.
This is also foolish. Anyone who waits for the next big thing because what is available will be obsolete will ALWAYS be in a state of waiting because advances are always being made.

My advice is and always has been, buy what you can afford when you need/want it. Don't worry about the future because the future is always coming. Plan for the future, sure, but don't hold your breath waiting for it.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,371 (3.56/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
It's A LOT closer to the 2070 than it is to a 2080... 1% difference at 1080p (where most people play) and 6% at 2560x1440. At the latter res, its still 14% away from a 2080.

I also thought the leaks put it close to 2070 as well?
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2015
Messages
51 (0.01/day)
Ironically there is, we call it rasterization :D Pre cooked RT sans the real time part ;)

Define 'we'. Rasterization is basically opposite of ray-tracing. Rasterization is done to shorten and simplify rendering 3d scene, exactly by *not* following light trace to its destination. Shaders can do both, but ray-tracing is a rather different from the calculation point of view, resulting in slowness.
 

Juankato1987

New Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
20 (0.01/day)
Location
Honduras
I think performance is more like RX570 than RX470. And GTX 1060 is $199/249, and RX 470 is $169? Plus what "huge" difference are you talking about?


And yeah, AMD has a CPU to offer too which would for sure means even cheaper prices.

Performance is actually a bit lower than RX 470, but with a 8GB of VRAM helps to get better numbers.
And I never said anything about RX 570, and a 27% can be held as a huge gap.
I'm talking about brute performance here, not counting with PS4 optimizations.




126319
 
Top