You can have your own opinions all you want, but that’s all they are. Opinions. My point is you couched your statement in no such opinion terms. And you continue to do that in your response to
@moproblems99 acting as if only your experience is fact. “Game is bad because I say so, and that is fact” summarizes your hubris in which you put down games and other’s opinions on them.
Please read what you're writing. Clearly you have an axe to grind and I'm not even sure what has gotten you so angry. You can't say "respect peoples opinions" and then disregard someone's you don't agree with while insulting them. Likewise, technical shortcomings
aren't opinions but rather facts. EX) Witcher 2 had issues with mouse input, and playing around with various settings and editing files would fix some issues but create more. I know you're not a fan of links, but here are two examples that took seconds for me to find:
Example
Example 2
The problem with the fixes is they will introduce horrific stuttering in menus. And it persisted even after a GPU/CPU upgrade (I replayed the game recently, close to 3 years after my initial run). GTX 970 and GTX 1070, 4670K and Ryzen 2700X, many years post release and the game still had technical issues that made the game less than a smooth experience.
Please note the differences between opinion and facts because there is a difference.
I notice a trend though. You finished TW3 and AC Odyssey in 80 or so hours. That is the exemplification of someone who has rushed through each of those games that really are 120 to 150 hour games to fully experience them.
This is also wrong. A good website to check is How Long to Beat. Witcher 3:
Average - 51 hours main story, 105 hours for everything.
~80 hours gave me around 30 hours of extra side content. That is exactly the opposite of rushing. That is doing practically every real side quest in the game not counting the DLC. Obviously you're using the DLC to inflate the hours in yet another attempt to say "you're bad at the game if you don't like it". Its a really tired and childish point because it doesn't make any sense. The irony is if it takes you that long to finish the main campaign/side quests
you're actually bad at the game; really, you'd be worse than the average of 2,800 other gamers polled.
Shall I do this for Assassin's Creed Odyssey as well?
Because the average is also 75 hours.
If you rush through the game you can finish it in around 40 hours. ~80 hours is doing practically every side quest in the game and visiting every single region of the map, including the empty ones with practically nothing to do. That is around a 100% increase in the time it takes over rushing it.
You can't add DLC to an average hour length of a game because not everyone owns the DLC and not buying the DLC isn't "rushing the game" or "being bad at the game". If you want to add DLC to length you should mention the game with all DLC = X amount of length. But you should probably ask that
before accusing someone of not knowing how to play a game or rushing through it an an awkward attempt to insult them.
As for gaming in general, stop being so jaded. Learn how to let go and enjoy what each and every game has to offer. Try it, and you’ll find that nearly all games offer fun and enjoyment. Positivity is contagious.
This is ironic. You disagree with opinions and disregard facts (like games having technical issues) and then add more insults. Sorry, people will have differing opinions. Just because you think something is great doesn't mean others are going to agree with you. Enjoyment comes in varying degrees. Witcher 3 was a mediocre experience and you're not going to convince me otherwise because I already explored what the game had to offer. And I've done the same with Witcher 2 with two play throughs.
I'll praise a great game, but so far CD Projekt has yet to deliver one. Witcher 3 didn't push boundaries, relied too heavily on common and not so fun mechanics/quests (eagle vision, pressing E to view a clue). As such I am skeptical for them adding MP to Cyberpunk. I'd rather have a great SP experience first, then they can deliver an MP game down the road. As I mentioned, offer it for $10 after Cyberpunk & DLC is out. They shouldn't bite off more than they can chew. That way they can also
minimize in game monetization with an small up front charge but cover the costs for the MP mode.
At this point, I’m convinced you are trolling, but you are just not very good at it. You end up just being belligerant and “screw what anyone else thinks,” while derailing this thread and others with topics that are not under discussion.
This is being intellectually dishonest. Read moproblems99 post and your own. I was discussing Cyberpunk and CD Projekt's previous titles and why I am not too thrilled with them taking on an online aspect (they only had one game that wasn't marred with technical issues and the 3rd needed some more development). His response is to add a personal insult and bring an off topic discussion (Assassin's creed Odyssey) because he is unable to articulate a response. Obviously, I am going to respond to these insults (which ironically would make you trolls).
Your supposed stance is to respect other people's opinion, but then turn around and insist that people must enjoy the things you like the way you do. And then add insults, assumptions, and numbers that are inconsistent with most players to support your point. Re-read your post, maybe check the links and you'll see how inconsistent and dishonest (hours length as the support for your "troll" insult argument) it was.