- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 695 (0.15/day)
- Location
- Australia
System Name | Eula |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X PBO |
Motherboard | ASUS TUF Gaming X670E Plus Wifi |
Cooling | Corsair H150i Elite LCD XT White |
Memory | Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6000 64GB (4x16GB F5-6000J3038F16GX2-TZ5NR) EXPO II, OCCT Tested |
Video Card(s) | Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4080 GAMING OC |
Storage | Corsair MP600 XT NVMe 2TB, Samsung 980 Pro NVMe 2TB, Toshiba N300 10TB HDD, Seagate Ironwolf 4T HDD |
Display(s) | Acer Predator X32FP 32in 160Hz 4K FreeSync/GSync DP, LG 32UL950 32in 4K HDR FreeSync/G-Sync DP |
Case | Phanteks Eclipse P500A D-RGB White |
Audio Device(s) | Creative Sound Blaster Z |
Power Supply | Corsair HX1000 Platinum 1000W |
Mouse | SteelSeries Prime Pro Gaming Mouse |
Keyboard | SteelSeries Apex 5 |
Software | MS Windows 11 Pro |
AMD and NVIDIA examples are used to show TFLOPS arguments are meaningless for raster graphics power.Why this turns to be AMD vs nvidia thread? The fact is this is Intel next discrete GPU thread. The only thing I wished for is competitive price/performance and Intel really need to step up in their driver department. With Gen11 support integer scaling I'm pretty sure they will carry this to discrete card as well, with that we will (hopefully) see AMD and nvidia supporting them too.
That's wrong. RTX 2080 TI's boost modes can exceed paper specs mentioned in https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-rtx-2080-ti.c3305The 512 core version could have up to 14.7 TFLOPS depending on clockspeeds. FP32. Thats more than 2080 Ti.
I don't think it will beat 2080 Ti in gaming tho... xD but Intel could have something decent up their sleeve here. The 10th gen mobile chips are not bad in the iGPU department. 3 times faster than 9th gen on average and this is with very low core count and clockspeed.
Looking forward to see the performance on these 4 dGPU's.
RTX 2080 Ti can reach 17.186 TFLOPS which is backed by six GPC (includes geometry-raster units) and read/write 88 ROPS at about 1950Mhz