• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD to Cough Up $12.1 Million to Settle "Bulldozer" Core Count Class-Action Lawsuit

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.44/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
"You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink."

I've demonstrated repeatedly, from multiple angles, with multiple sources what a "core" is and AMD redefined it for personal gain; they also agreed to not do it again by settling. What more is there to discuss?
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,504 (3.27/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
Certainly not when the water is stale.

Bulldozer has 8 cores. You've only speculated what you think a core is by constantly inventing new definitions and rules outside the subject and context in which this was discussed, that's a big difference. And sources ? Don't make me laugh, you don't get to say that when your response to actual material that proved my point was "they lied".
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,234 (0.23/day)
Location
USA, Arizona
System Name SolarwindMobile
Processor AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Motherboard Acer Wasp_BR
Cooling It's Copper.
Memory 2 x 8GB SK Hynix/HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF
Video Card(s) ATI/AMD Radeon R7 Series (Bristol Ridge FP4) [ACER]
Storage TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB + KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128 GB
Display(s) ViewSonic XG2401 SERIES
Case Acer Aspire E5-553G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC255
Power Supply PANASONIC AS16A5K
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Ducky Channel Shine 3
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit (Version 1607, Build 14393.969)
So you see the problem? Bulldozer "execution cores" lack the hardware to decode AMD64 instructions which is a function of the "core" (aka processor). "Execution cores" as defined in Bulldozer lack the hardware necessary to be considered a "core:" they are merely "execution units." ...and these are the wheels the turn the gears of false advertising.
"More specifically, this invention relates to processors that convert an x86 instructions into RISC-type operations for execution on a RISC-type core."
"The core of the processor is a RISC superscalar processing engine."
"The heart of the AMD-K6 processor is a RISC core known as the enhanced RISC86 microarchitecture."
"The AMD-K5 processor’s superscalar RISC core consists of six execution units: two arithmetic logic units (ALU), two load/store units, one branch unit, and one floating-point unit (FPU). This superscalar core is fully decoupled from the x86 bus through the conversion of variable-length x86 instructions into simple, fixed-length RISC operations (ROPs) that are easier to handle and execute faster. Once the x86 instruction has been converted, a dispatcher issues four ROPs at a time to the superscalar core. The processor’s superscalar core can execute at a peak rate of six ROPs per cycle. The superscalar core supports data forwarding and data bypassing to immediately forward the results of an execution to successive instructions."
"AMD-K6 MMX Processor : High-performance RISC core : Yes / 6-issue (RISC86)"
"The execution engine implements a superscalar, out-of-order, reduced instruction set computing (RISC) architecture"
"The dual instruction decoders translate X86 instructions on-the-fly into corresponding RISC86 Ops. The RISC86 Ops are executed by an instruction core that is essentially a RISC superscalar processing engine."
"From the viewpoint of packing multiple primitive operations into a coarser schedulable unit and performing schedule and execution of macro-ops, the proposed microarchitecture employs a counter approach to recent x86 processor implementations that crack a CISC instruction and convert it into multiple RISC semantics running on RISC-style cores."
"As a coarser-grained approach in the opposite direction, the AMD K7 and the Intel Pentium M have adopted techniques to allow an issue queue entry to accommodate multiple micro-ops as a form of fused operations for certain types of x86 instructions. Original micro-ops are loosely coupled in a fused operation from the scheduler’s perspective; they are scheduled individually according to the readiness of corresponding source operands."
RISC86 which poorly interpreted x86 to Macro-ops which were better interpreted for x86.

"AMD-K7 ™ Processor Architecture => Three Parallel x86 Instruction Decoders => Decoding Pipelines can dispatch 3 MacroOps to Execution Unit Schedulers, Load / Store Queue Unit => Result Busses from Core"
^-- this one is the most intriguing as the only mention of a core is for the LSU slide.


"The AMD Athlon processor microarchitecture is a decoupled decode/execution design approach. In other words, the decoders essentially operate independent of the execution units, and the execution core uses a small number of instructions and simplified circuit design for fast single-cycle execution and fast operating frequencies."

Then, K8 happens... oh dear...
"The AMD64 architecture employs a decoupled decode/execution design approach. In other words, decoders and execution units essentially operate independently; the execution core uses a small number of instructions and simplified circuit design for fast single-cycle execution and fast operating frequencies."
"The AMD Athlon 64 and AMD Opteron processors implement the AMD64 instruction set by means of micro-ops—simple fixed-length operations designed to include direct support for AMD64 instructions and adhere to the high-performance principles of fixed-length encoding, regularized instruction fields, and a large register set. The enhanced microarchitecture enables higher processor core performance and promotes straightforward extensibility for future designs"

That is all dandy, but then it explodes: CPU cores, cores, processor cores, etc. Which isn't the core they originally defined; "This superscalar core is fully decoupled from the x86 bus through the conversion of variable-length x86 instructions into simple, fixed-length RISC operations (ROPs) that are easier to handle and execute faster."

"A processor core for supporting the concurrent execution of mixed integer and floating point operations includes integer functional units utilizing 32-bit operand data and a floating point functional unit utilizing up to 82-bit operand data."
"FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram of a layout of a mixed floating point/integer processor core"
 
Last edited:

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.44/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Bravo! TL;DR: that's the story of how the x86 front-end is interpreted into a series of microOPs which are executed by the execution units.

That is all dandy, but then it explodes: CPU cores, cores, processor cores, etc. Which isn't the core they originally defined; "This superscalar core is fully decoupled from the x86 bus through the conversion of variable-length x86 instructions into simple, fixed-length RISC operations (ROPs) that are easier to handle and execute faster."
Exactly why we have two definitions of "core" now and why it is imperative to declare which is being discussed, especially in marketing materials. In this quote (without extra context), it sounds like they're referring to an execution unit as a "superscalar core." P5 was the first superscalar x86 architecture and, if you look at what it had (MMX, FPU, ALU-Y, ALU-U), it's easy to understand why they went with a superscalar approach:

I make it clear what is what here:
1920px-Intel_Pentium_arch.svg.png

You put two execution units in a core, you get two execution units, not two cores. The reason why everyone went with SMT now is because SMT has all of the benefits of more execution units without putting a physical wall between them. Wider execution units are preferable to many execution units...at least when dealing with x86...because the odds of being able to saturate all of the pipelines in the execution unit are better. This means greater efficiency.

The picture above is in line with the terms AMD settled with: "core" includes fetcher to L1 data cache.

If you disagree, I remind you that Kumar et. al. (likely the inspiration for Bulldozer) described the design as a "conjoined-core" intentionally omitting the plural form of core. That is not a mistake and the hyphen makes it clear which definition of the word "core" is used for the purpose of the technical paper.

Going back to K8...that was actually mirrored to become the first dual-core x86 processor...and AMD put it on the box loud and proud:
CP189AM_7259_800x800.jpg


I actually found the product PDF too, straight off of AMD's servers:
Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core Product Data Sheet

Looky what it says about "dual-core:"
dual-core.png

AMD explicitly *includes* L2 (off to the left) in their definition of "core" which means the definition of "core" goes far beyond just the "execution unit" (left part of the gray area):
A64Archi.gif

The only parts of this image that AMD effectively excluded from the definition of "core" is SRQ, XBar, and IMC.

See what happened there? AMD contradicted themselves with Bulldozer and the motive is clear (over-represent their product).


As for Intel? Well, they were never so brash as to put "#-core" on a box as AMD did. They usually like to hide it behind model numbers and fine print. Anyway, let's have a look at Pentium D which is two MCM'd Pentium 4s:
When you click the little (?) next to "# of cores" it says: "Cores is a hardware term that describes the number of independent central processing units in a single computing component (die or chip)." Remember how I said Core 2 Quad has four processors? That's basically Intel's words, innit? Intel has been extremely consistent in describing their "cores" as discreet processors networked together since the beginning.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,234 (0.23/day)
Location
USA, Arizona
System Name SolarwindMobile
Processor AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Motherboard Acer Wasp_BR
Cooling It's Copper.
Memory 2 x 8GB SK Hynix/HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF
Video Card(s) ATI/AMD Radeon R7 Series (Bristol Ridge FP4) [ACER]
Storage TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB + KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128 GB
Display(s) ViewSonic XG2401 SERIES
Case Acer Aspire E5-553G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC255
Power Supply PANASONIC AS16A5K
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Ducky Channel Shine 3
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit (Version 1607, Build 14393.969)
See what happened there? AMD contradicted themselves with Bulldozer and the motive is clear (over-represent their product).
No, AMD contradicted themselves with K8. What K8 defines as a core is a processor. Whereas what Bulldozer defines as a core is a core.

K8 is a dual-processor CPU with each processor having a single core.
Family 15h 70h-7Fh is a single-processor CPU with that one processor having two cores.

Bulldozer uses the older definition with priority rather than K8s which seems to be a marketing gaff.

Even, Intel called it the core with AMD;
"In-Order Front End -> Its job is to supply a high-bandwidth stream of decoded instructions to the out-of-order execution core, which will do the actual completion of the instructions. These IA-32 instruction bytes are then decoded into basic operations called uops (micro-operations) that the execution core is able to execute."

"The P6 microarchitecture is made up of in-order front end, out-of-order core and in-order retirement units.

The front end includes Instruction Fetch, Instruction Decode, Branch Target Buffer, Micro-instruction Sequencer, and Register Address Table units. The out-of-order core is made up several execution units; the units include Floating Point Execution units, Integer Execution units, and Address Generation units. The in-order retirement back end includes the Re-order Buffer and the Register Retirement File units."

"Intel ® Microarchitecture Code Name Sandy Bridge:
-> An in-order issue front end that fetches instructions and decodes them into micro-ops (micro-opera-
tions). The front end feeds the next pipeline stages with a continuous stream of micro-ops from the
most likely path that the program will execute.
-> An out-of-order, superscalar execution engine that dispatches up to six micro-ops to execution, per
cycle. The allocate/rename block reorders micro-ops to "dataflow" order so they can execute as soon
as their sources are ready and execution resources are available.

-> An in-order retirement unit that ensures that the results of execution of the micro-ops, including any
exceptions they may have encountered, are visible according to the original program order.

The out-of-order core consist of three execution stacks, where each stack encapsulates a certain type of
data. The execution core contains the following execution stacks:
• General purpose integer
• SIMD integer and floating-point
• X87"

Intel used AMD's misdefintion in Core Duo, Core Quad, and pretty much everything relating to multi-processors. However, the docs point to the out-of-order portion of the Intel processor as the core.

Multi-core processor => AMD's Family 15h(two cores)/Sun's Rock(four cores)
Multi-processors with single-cores => K8, Core Duo, Core 2 Quad, Athlon/Phenom X4, etc.
Multi-processors with multi-cores => Family 15h Model 00h-0Fh(8 cores)/Sun's rock(16 cores)
 
Last edited:

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.44/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
K8 is a dual-processor CPU with each processor having a single core.
That is not what AMD put on the box. It says "dual-core" not "dual-processor." They confirm the two are one in the same in the product data sheet.

They not only said the same thing on Phenom II but they added "true quad-core design:"
IMG_0243.jpg

Remember why they did that? Because AMD's marketeers felt the Core 2 Duo "module" wasn't really a "dual-core" because of the shared L2 cache with AMD processors didn't share until Bulldozer (among many other things), if memory serves.

Hilarious, isn't it? It's almost like AMD kept changing the definition of "core" to suit themselves. Because they did. The only difference is that AMD's moving goal post didn't really mean anything to consumers until Bulldozer because they were pushing this notion that consumers were getting twice the number of cores as they really were. That's an argument that can be taken to court for damages--and they were.


As I pointed out: 2005 established the definition of what a "dual-core processor" was and AMD and Intel were united on that front. Intel has been consistent since; AMD has not: dual-core (Athlon 64 X2) = processor replication -> "true" dual-core (Phenom) = no sharing L2 cache (this was and remains a stupid argument) -> conjoined-core (Bulldozer) = really one core but we're going to sell it as two -> quad-core (Zen) = processor replication. I think it's fairly safe to say that this ridiculous AMD chapter is closed for good.

Even, Intel called it the core with AMD;
"In-Order Front End -> Its job is to supply a high-bandwidth stream of decoded instructions to the out-of-order execution core, which will do the actual completion of the instructions. These IA-32 instruction bytes are then decoded into basic operations called uops (micro-operations) that the execution core is able to execute."

"The P6 microarchitecture is made up of in-order front end, out-of-order core and in-order retirement units.

The front end includes Instruction Fetch, Instruction Decode, Branch Target Buffer, Micro-instruction Sequencer, and Register Address Table units. The out-of-order core is made up several execution units; the units include Floating Point Execution units, Integer Execution units, and Address Generation units. The in-order retirement back end includes the Re-order Buffer and the Register Retirement File units."

"Intel ® Microarchitecture Code Name Sandy Bridge:
-> An in-order issue front end that fetches instructions and decodes them into micro-ops (micro-opera-
tions). The front end feeds the next pipeline stages with a continuous stream of micro-ops from the
most likely path that the program will execute.
-> An out-of-order, superscalar execution engine that dispatches up to six micro-ops to execution, per
cycle. The allocate/rename block reorders micro-ops to "dataflow" order so they can execute as soon
as their sources are ready and execution resources are available.

-> An in-order retirement unit that ensures that the results of execution of the micro-ops, including any
exceptions they may have encountered, are visible according to the original program order.

The out-of-order core consist of three execution stacks, where each stack encapsulates a certain type of
data. The execution core contains the following execution stacks:
• General purpose integer
• SIMD integer and floating-point
• X87"

Intel used AMD's misdefintion in Core Duo, Core Quad, and pretty much everything relating to multi-processors. However, the docs point to the out-of-order portion of the Intel processor as the core.

Multi-core processor => AMD's Family 15h(two cores)/Sun's Rock(four cores)
Multi-processors with single-cores => K8, Core Duo, Core 2 Quad, Athlon/Phenom X4, etc.
Multi-processors with multi-cores => Family 15h Model 00h-0Fh(8 cores)/Sun's rock(16 cores)
Quotations without citations are plagiarism.

Your Sandy Bridge quote yet again makes my point for me: they quit calling it a "core" because since 2005, that means exclusively processor; they instead call it a "superscalar execution engine" which eliminates the confusion. Call anything that isn't a complete processor inside of a multi-processor chip a "core" today, beware of the lawyers.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,234 (0.23/day)
Location
USA, Arizona
System Name SolarwindMobile
Processor AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Motherboard Acer Wasp_BR
Cooling It's Copper.
Memory 2 x 8GB SK Hynix/HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF
Video Card(s) ATI/AMD Radeon R7 Series (Bristol Ridge FP4) [ACER]
Storage TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB + KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128 GB
Display(s) ViewSonic XG2401 SERIES
Case Acer Aspire E5-553G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC255
Power Supply PANASONIC AS16A5K
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Ducky Channel Shine 3
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit (Version 1607, Build 14393.969)
That is not what AMD put on the box. It says "dual-core" not "dual-processor." They confirm the two are one in the same in the product data sheet.

They not only said the same thing on Phenom II but they added "true quad-core design:"
The definition of a processor includes a core. So, regardless a processor must have a core. So, four processors would always net at minimum four cores.

Phenom X4/Phenom II X6 can either be referred by the processor count or the core count. It would still be correct. However, it isn't a true quad-core design for your reasoning. It is a monolithic quad-core design, where as the Core 2 Quad was two monolithic dual-core designs.

"Remember why they did that? Because AMD's marketeers felt the Core 2 Duo "module" wasn't really a "dual-core" because of the shared L2 cache with AMD processors didn't share until Bulldozer (among many other things), if memory serves."
As stated above, it was a jab at Intel for their MCM design.



Intel's Xeon is a true 28-core/28-processor design, while AMD's EPYC is only an 8-core/8-processor design * 4.

Relative to x86/x86-64, the Bulldozer compute unit processor microarchitecture, is the first true x86 dual-core processor. Athlon X2 for example is two single-core processors that are glued together.

K8/10h/12h processor microarchitecture doesn't include two cores; Only AMD Bulldozer's compute unit processor microarchitecture contains two cores. Of the two, only Bulldozer can keep the native dual-core architecture. So, if AMD comes out with an octo-core processor microarchitecture, then neither FX or Ryzen can be said to be natively octo-core.

With AMD's Stoney Ridge, it can be called a native/true/etc dual-core processor and it will convey the message well. However, AMD for Raven2 would definitely want to market it as a two single-core processors design glued together through the shared L3 cache. Raven2 isn't natively or truely a dual-core processor as it is two replicated single-core processors which are glued together via L3.

Raven2 without SMT => Core 0 writes X in a FPU register, Core 1 is dependent on X for a FPU opteration. 100s to 1000s of cycles from PRF(core 0) -> L1(core 0) -> L2(core 0) -> L3(shared) -> L2(core 1) -> L1(core 1) -> PRF(core 0) -> execution.
^- non-native dual-core

Stoney with CMT => Core 0 writes X in a FPU, Core 1 is dependent on a X for a FPU operations. A few cycles from renaming -> PRF-tag with Core0 -> PRF-tag with core 1 -> execution.
^- native dual-core
 
Last edited:

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.44/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
You're missing the point. Again. AMD explicitly said that K8 "core" included L1 and L2 caches which includes front end, execution units, L2 cache, floating point units, and everything in between. Intel mirrored that definition since Pentium D.

This thing you like calling a "core" has a dozen names that fundamentally means the same thing but it is no longer singularly called a "core," it is always prefaced with a descriptor (superscalar, out of order, execution, integer, etc.). "Core" by itself, especially in marketing, means one thing and one thing alone since 2005: a processor which includes front end, the various types of units, and sometimes L2+ caches. It's hardware that receives x86 instructions, processes, and returns the full result.

This feels like a merry-go-round. It's settled. I'm done here.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,234 (0.23/day)
Location
USA, Arizona
System Name SolarwindMobile
Processor AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Motherboard Acer Wasp_BR
Cooling It's Copper.
Memory 2 x 8GB SK Hynix/HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF
Video Card(s) ATI/AMD Radeon R7 Series (Bristol Ridge FP4) [ACER]
Storage TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB + KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128 GB
Display(s) ViewSonic XG2401 SERIES
Case Acer Aspire E5-553G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC255
Power Supply PANASONIC AS16A5K
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Ducky Channel Shine 3
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit (Version 1607, Build 14393.969)
AMD explicitly said that K8 "core" included L1 and L2 caches which includes front end, execution units, L2 cache, floating point units, and everything in between. Intel mirrored that definition since Pentium D.
The earlier definition has priority or precedence in this case. However neither definitions are technically correct. A core is only; a control unit, a datapath, an instruction bus, and a data bus.

The control unit in K7/K8/10h/12h is called the instruction control unit. Which is directly interconnected with the 3-wide OoO integer datapath and remotely interconnected with the 3-wide OoO floating point datapath. The instruction bus and data bus are easily confirmed can instructions flow in and can data flow out. Boom its a core.

K7 core is instruction control + integer datapath
K8 core is instruction control + integer datapath
Family 10h/12h core is instruction control + integer datapath
Family 15h core is instruction control + integer datapath, which Family 15h's compute unit has TWO.
etc.

L1 cache, L2 cache, FPU, Front-end, etc are not part of the core.
 
Last edited:

Keviny Oliveira

New Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2019
Messages
13 (0.01/day)
"cores" which share resources in a "conjoined-core." These do not qualify as "processors."
But not make sense, lol, If the processor has 2 cores him is a dual core, even though it has lower performance than a 1-core processor, it is logical that FXs cores are non-logical physical, so the FX 8300 is an octa-core where certain tasks have the same performance as a quad core.
 
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
21,541 (3.40/day)
System Name Pioneer
Processor Ryzen R9 9950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310
Storage Intel 905p Optane 960GB boot, +2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs
Display(s) 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display
Case Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s) TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W
Mouse Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless
Keyboard WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps
Software Gentoo Linux x64 / Windows 11 Enterprise IoT 2024
Remember how Sun designed a conjoined-core on steroids? Why do you think they never released it?

Probably because Oracle bought them out and released it as one of the many shared FPU sparcs at the time...

But not make sense, lol, If the processor has 2 cores him is a dual core, even though it has lower performance than a 1-core processor, it is logical that FXs cores are non-logical physical, so the FX 8300 is an octa-core where certain tasks have the same performance as a quad core.

Wut
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2008
Messages
355 (0.06/day)
Location
Canberra Australia
Processor i5 750 4.2ghz 1.4V
Motherboard Gigabyte P55-UD4P
Cooling Corsair H70
Memory 2X2G Gskill @2140 8-11-8-28-1T
Video Card(s) 2xGainward Phantom3 570@860/4200
Storage 2xWD 500G AAKS Raid0 + 2XWD 1T Green in Raid0
Display(s) 24" HP w2408h+23" HP w2338h
Case SilverStone Raven2E-B
Audio Device(s) onboard for now
Power Supply Antec 1000W Truepower quattro
Software Win7 Ultimate 64bit
"Real Man use Real Cores"
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,171 (2.79/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
I've read this thread somewhere else... and I'm still not convinced because they're still the same flawed arguments predicated on "what has been in a core," not, "what actually defines a core," on top of the fact that such rigid definitions of a "core" is only going to tie new designs to an archaic way of looking at things just for the purposes of legal bullshit.

Honestly, I don't think this has anything to do with if they're cores or not. That's just the legal argument. I honestly think that this really is about some rich idiot who feels duped because he didn't understand what he was buying because a normal person isn't going to buy a CPU then choose to sue because it wasn't good enough because most people are bright enough to look at reviews and make a judgement call themselves. Most people also aren't willing to invest the resources in suing because it takes money to do that.

I honestly think this entire debate is despicable.

I also think the last group of people who are qualified to make this call are armchair warriors.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2014
Messages
104 (0.03/day)
ever notice these B.S. lawsuits all come out of cali? who can I go after to get my $90 shoes replaced after walking through the human feces and needles in downtown sanfransicko?
 
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
226 (0.05/day)
System Name My Little Bad Boy
Processor i7 6900K
Motherboard ASUS X99 E WS USB 3.1
Cooling By Noctua
Memory 128 GB CORSAIR DOMINATOR
Video Card(s) EVGA GEFORCE GTX 1070 FTW
Storage Many TB's of storage of all kinds
Display(s) ASUS 27" Monitor
Case Thermal Take Level 10 GT
Audio Device(s) onboard sound
Power Supply Corsair Platinum HX1000i
Mouse I use whatever mouse works best at the time. I have dozens
Keyboard LOGITECH PRODIGY keyboard
Software Windows 7 Ultimate, Windows 8.1 Pro, Linux Mint
Benchmark Scores 3.91 GHz on this. Happy with it as it is. Not a gaming rig.
Lies. Lies, lies, lies, lies. AMD lies, Intel lies, they all lie. Anyway this is just a test to see if my signature works. It probably doesn't but just the same...
 
Top