- Joined
- Jan 2, 2014
- Messages
- 253 (0.06/day)
- Location
- Edmonton
System Name | Coffeelake the Zen Destroyer |
---|---|
Processor | 8700K @5.1GHz |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA |
Cooling | Cooled by EK |
Memory | RGB DDR4 4133MHz CL17-17-17-37 |
Video Card(s) | GTX 780 Ti to future GTX 1180Ti |
Storage | SAMSUNG 960 PRO 512GB |
Display(s) | ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27VQ to ROG SWIFT PG35VQ |
Case | Cooler Master HAF X Nvidia Edition |
Audio Device(s) | Logitech |
Power Supply | COOLER MASTER 1KW Gold |
Mouse | LOGITECH Gaming |
Keyboard | Logitech Gaming |
Software | MICROSOFT Redstone 4 |
Benchmark Scores | Cine Bench 15 single performance 222 |
What are you stuck on? Intel’s recent statement saying they are still marginally better without saying marginally?
As an owner of both the 3900X and 9900K and a very frequent high refresh gamer I can say if I had to get rid of both and build 1 new system I build with the 3900X or 3700X. Really the 9900K gets dragged through the dirt in heavily threaded apps. In games, when running tweaked memory I can close in on and often beat the 9900K. The 3900X and 9900K are so close in high refresh gaming running tweaked RAM that it could easily pass a blind test.
I could never get down with high refresh gaming performance of Zen and Zen+ but Zen2 is it and it’s funny because it’s doing it several hundred MHz under Intel and when I need to get work done the 24 threaded 3900X shames the 9900K.
3900X is not even a true 12 cores CPU but two 6 cores CPUs working together. 3900X is a gaming power hog!
9900KS is out soon!