Not trolling, just trying to figure out based on the specs how to see if this card (or any other) is lower or top tier performance.
That improvement with lower specs comes with the change to DLNA achitecture, the change to 7nm or both?
So if you cant compare CU's, TFLOP's, TDP's there are no way to compare based on the specs, how can we know if it is an entry level or a enthusiast card?
Well you can do some predictions from current Turing to Navi performance parity:
RTX 2070S(9620,48 GFLops) = 1.088*RX 5700xt(9661,44 GFlops), RTX 2070(8580,096 GFlops) = 1.12 RX 5700(7704,58 GFlops)
So assuming that RX 5500 has the same actual gaming clocks as gtx1660/S by TFlops alone coefficient will be something like 1.09. But RX 5500(224GB/s) has more memory bandwidth than 1660(192GB/s), but less memory bandwidth than 1660S(336GB/s), so one cannot really get the coefficient before equaling memory bandwidth. @W1zzard could run 1080p tests with vanilla 1660 gddr5 OC 2333MHz, thus 4*2.333*192/8 = 224GB/s to equaling RX 5500 memory bandwidth. But that would take too much work for proving very little.