- Joined
- Nov 4, 2005
- Messages
- 11,889 (1.73/day)
System Name | Compy 386 |
---|---|
Processor | 7800X3D |
Motherboard | Asus |
Cooling | Air for now..... |
Memory | 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz |
Video Card(s) | 7900XTX 310 Merc |
Storage | Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs, 24TB Enterprise drives |
Display(s) | 55" Samsung 4K HDR |
Audio Device(s) | ATI HDMI |
Mouse | Logitech MX518 |
Keyboard | Razer |
Software | A lot. |
Benchmark Scores | Its fast. Enough. |
No, its not, nothing in the 14nm Intel process is in 14nm and nothing in 7nm TSMC process is in 7nm (not even close xD)
Little correction : The fin width is 8nm (on intel 14nm) and 6nm (on TSMC 10 and 7nm) but we can extrapolate that on intel 1.4nm, the fin width won't be that small (and it's just the width anyway).
I just read the source document, there is no talk about number of atoms, no talk about metal layers and no talk about copper transistors. So i guess you just made that up?
And i dont claim to be an enthusiast, i am one.
And i would really want to lay off the harsh sauce, but as you can see, you guys aren't helping me...
Nah, copper atoms have a radius of .128nm so at 1.4nm there will be approximately 12, as 1.4 / .128 = 10.9 plus when packed as a metallic crystal lattice plus the variation of etch in the traces means approximately 12 atoms wide traces.
I suppose I did make all of this up, all CPU transistors contain tiny people, trapped and forced to learn math..... It's a huge conspiracy.