- Joined
- Nov 18, 2010
- Messages
- 7,595 (1.48/day)
- Location
- Rīga, Latvia
System Name | HELLSTAR |
---|---|
Processor | AMD RYZEN 9 5950X |
Motherboard | ASUS Strix X570-E |
Cooling | 2x 360 + 280 rads. 3x Gentle Typhoons, 3x Phanteks T30, 2x TT T140 . EK-Quantum Momentum Monoblock. |
Memory | 4x8GB G.SKILL Trident Z RGB F4-4133C19D-16GTZR 14-16-12-30-44 |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire Pulse RX 7900XTX. Water block. Crossflashed. |
Storage | Optane 900P[Fedora] + WD BLACK SN850X 4TB + 750 EVO 500GB + 1TB 980PRO+SN560 1TB(W11) |
Display(s) | Philips PHL BDM3270 + Acer XV242Y |
Case | Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO |
Audio Device(s) | SMSL RAW-MDA1 DAC |
Power Supply | Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W |
Mouse | Razer Basilisk |
Keyboard | Razer BlackWidow V3 - Yellow Switch |
Software | FEDORA 41 |
Anad is right... Exynos design is on the brink...as they say stinks. EU customers have no choice to pick up QC based S20 and that's the issue. For the higher price we get inferior product. Samsung is really a good as an average maker, well except really making so much crap middle end phones, leaving me with headache, sometimes I cannot remember even the marketing name for them, only the codename. Making those middle segment phones, they do mistakes, and gosh how many, thus racking a bad rep... the stink covers even the good things they make.
I haven't had many S20 boards my hands yet and evaluate the power tables and their averages ie silicon quality. But already with S10 I rarely saw ASV tables better than 3. Average battery life got worse versus older S9 gen, they have to clock it higher to cover the arch deficiency. My Qualcomm SD based devices, like Sony, LG and weird rare makers not worth mentioning do work faster in many workloads, including web and gaming and have better battery life without much thinking about it. They don't have the power to market and do not pay for better reviews and do not tamper benchmarks that often...
@R0H1T calm down. It is a fact. Even best XDA devs are spitting on Exynos with last gens and said no more of that crap. If you put besides an US and RoW versions with Exynos and QD of the same version, they differ a lot speed wise... If you have that opportunity do the testing yourself... don't indulge much on reading reviews, they have often cherry picked devices also running alternate software. It is simple you know...
I have to accent, I have to deal with them personally all my time... as it is my job... I know mobile HW as my backyard on smallest element level, and the heck it evolves just by blinking an eye... truly a tech spearhead, PC has fallen behind a bit actually. AMD stepping in seemed to be a logical step.
I haven't had many S20 boards my hands yet and evaluate the power tables and their averages ie silicon quality. But already with S10 I rarely saw ASV tables better than 3. Average battery life got worse versus older S9 gen, they have to clock it higher to cover the arch deficiency. My Qualcomm SD based devices, like Sony, LG and weird rare makers not worth mentioning do work faster in many workloads, including web and gaming and have better battery life without much thinking about it. They don't have the power to market and do not pay for better reviews and do not tamper benchmarks that often...
@R0H1T calm down. It is a fact. Even best XDA devs are spitting on Exynos with last gens and said no more of that crap. If you put besides an US and RoW versions with Exynos and QD of the same version, they differ a lot speed wise... If you have that opportunity do the testing yourself... don't indulge much on reading reviews, they have often cherry picked devices also running alternate software. It is simple you know...
I have to accent, I have to deal with them personally all my time... as it is my job... I know mobile HW as my backyard on smallest element level, and the heck it evolves just by blinking an eye... truly a tech spearhead, PC has fallen behind a bit actually. AMD stepping in seemed to be a logical step.
Last edited: