- Joined
- Jun 3, 2008
- Messages
- 777 (0.13/day)
- Location
- Pacific Coast
System Name | Z77 Rev. 1 |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i7 3770K |
Motherboard | ASRock Z77 Extreme4 |
Cooling | Water Cooling |
Memory | 2x G.Skill F3-2400C10D-16GTX |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GTX 1080 |
Storage | Samsung 850 Pro |
Display(s) | Samsung 28" UE590 UHD |
Case | Silverstone TJ07 |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard |
Power Supply | Seasonic PRIME 600W Titanium |
Mouse | EVGA TORQ X10 |
Keyboard | Leopold Tenkeyless |
Software | Windows 10 Pro 64-bit |
Benchmark Scores | 3DMark Time Spy: 7695 |
Well, there is a market for anything.
High impedance fans don't cater to the noise consciencious market. There is no relativite ground in this measure. If it is high impedance, you have the turbulence.
Also, high impedance destroys the image of the coolers. Once you push more air, the flow cross-section becomes turbulent and a competitive noise race with blade servers starts. Very funny to notice this, it totally limits fan preferences.
View attachment 155594
I think that you are somehow missing the point. I have zero interest in the information you provided and am not arguing anything about airflow. It's really funny that you think that is what high impedance or low impedance means. I mean, it doesn't even say that anywhere on the graphs you provided, but somehow that is already what it means to you. I sure hope that this terminology hasn't already caught on with others; otherwise confusion is unavoidable.
Using the term "low impedance" or "high impedance" to describe a PWM fan's air flow is STUPID. That's the problem.
Couldn't they use any other term? What's wrong with static pressure or CFM or any other already available measure of airflow?
PWM is an electronic feature. High impedance, or low impedance, is an electronic design characteristic. Stating "Low impedance PWM fan" literally states that it uses a low impedance PWM circuit; which is electrically terrible for this purpose. Literally. Like, you know, this is English, and that is what they wrote. That's also terrible; to destroy the meaning of words. Electrical impedance is very important ... why devalue it by using it to describe airflow?
Can't they use any other less misleading marketing terminology?
Last edited: