• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M with HBM2 Benchmarked

Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
7,762 (2.76/day)
Location
Back in Norway
System Name Hotbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 110/95/110, PBO +150Mhz, CO -7,-7,-20(x6),
Motherboard ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax
Cooling LOBO + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14
Memory 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14 @3800c15
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UC@2250MHz max @~200W
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro
Display(s) Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary
Case SSUPD Meshlicious
Audio Device(s) Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Keychron K3/Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps
Software Windows 10 Pro
You know, doing things at point scale is a driver choice which OGSSAA is akin to. You might enjoy the greater textural quality, however the method is not without its disclaimer: ordered sampling introduces its grid pattern into the sampling distribution. So, it skews the sampling distribution rather than filtering it. RGSSAA provides more(root^2) multisample antialiasing at xy axis, in relation to diagonal antialiasing(-root^2).
All things said, it is not without cause; antialiasing is for filtering, not sampling aliases.
So, these aren't just preferential differences why the fraction is not set to be divisible.
As usual, your posts are needlessly technical gibberish that generally don't relate to the topic. "point scale"? "textural quality"? "sampling distribution"? I'm talking about being able to compare two things with the same metric. For gaming performance, that generally means the same game, at the same resolution, at the same settings, with the same driver and as few background applications as possible. What you are talking about has no relevance to this whatsoever.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2010
Messages
2,540 (0.48/day)
As usual, your posts are needlessly technical gibberish that generally don't relate to the topic. "point scale"? "textural quality"? "sampling distribution"? I'm talking about being able to compare two things with the same metric. For gaming performance, that generally means the same game, at the same resolution, at the same settings, with the same driver and as few background applications as possible. What you are talking about has no relevance to this whatsoever.
The game designers cannot introduce repeating patterns just some random npc found necessary, alright?
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2016
Messages
128 (0.04/day)
System Name Ryzen 5800X-PC / RyzenITX (2nd system 5800X stock)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (atx) / 5800X itx (soon one pc getting 5800X3D upgrade! ;)
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (ATX) / X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi (ITX)
Cooling AMD Wrath Prism Cooler / Alphenhone Blackridge (ITX)
Memory OLOY 4000Mhz 16GB x 2 (32GB) DDR4 4000 Mhz CL18, (22,22,22,42) 1.40v AT & ITX PC's (2000 Fclk)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (ATX) /// AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB GDDR6 (ITX)
Storage (Sys)Sammy 970EVO 500GB & SabrentRocket 4.0+ 2TB (ATX) | SabrentRocket4.0+ 1TB NVMe (ITX)
Display(s) 30" Ultra-Wide 21:9 200Hz/AMD FREESYNC 200hz/144hz LED LCD Montior Connected Via Display Port (x2)
Case Lian Li Lancool II Mesh (ATX) / Velkase Velka 7 (ITX)
Audio Device(s) Realtek HD ALC1220 codec / Onboard HD Audio* (BOTH) w/ EQ settings
Power Supply 850w (Antec High-Current Gamer) HC-850 PSU (80+ gold certified) ATX) /650Watt Thermaltake SFX (ITX)
Mouse Logitech USB Wireless KB & MOUSE (Both Systems)
Keyboard Logitech USB Wireless KB & MOUSE (Both Systems)
VR HMD Oculus Quest 2 - 128GB - Standalone + Oculus link PC
Software Windows 10 Home x64bit 2400 /BOTH SYSTEMS
Benchmark Scores CPUZ - ATX-5800X (ST:670) - (MT: 6836.3 ) CPUZ - ITX -5800X (ST:680.2) - (MT: 7015.2) ??? same CPU?
one would think the editor should mention that
actually They did HERE:

"With 2,560 RDNA stream processors, you'd expect more performance, ****but this card was designed to meet stringent power limits of 50 W, **** and has significantly lower clock-speeds than "Navi 10" based Radeon Pro graphics cards (1035 MHz max boost engine clock vs. 1930 MHz and 205 W TDP of the Pro W5700). Find more interesting commentary in the Max Tech video presentation."

That RX 5600M config is what i wish i had in a NUC-sized computer, for real.
oh yea, Me TOO!!!! ") Just not an apple devce :p
 
Top