We got some snake oil news yesterday with Tachyum, and more today with NUVIA. Truly our cups doth runneth over! (With liquid fecal matter squeezed from the distended anuses of said companies' PR departments, but hey, news is news... right, TPU staff? Will we be getting any WccfTech rumours reported as news today? I cannot WAIT!)
Also, Geekbench. LOL. Way to kill any credibility you might have had, NUVIA.
I'd agree with you... but there seems to be a lot of buzz over the team NUVIA formed. This release here is all marketing... but some chip-nerds have thrown their weight behind NUVIA.
I take these results with a grain of salt (especially because they're simulated). However, that doesn't change the names behind NUVIA.
Qualcomm invents breakthrough technologies that transform how the world connects, computes and communicates. When we connected the phone to the Internet, the mobile revolution was born. Today, as we unlock 5G, we’re applying our mobile expertise to transform industries, create jobs, and enrich...
nuviainc.com
Gerard Williams: Worked at Apple as Chief CPU Architect, ARM, Intel, and TI.
Manu Gulati: Google, Apple (Lead of SoC team), Broadcom and AMD
John Bruno: Google, Apple, AMD, ATI, Chief Engineer to "Trinity" APU.
The buzz over this group is less about the claims they're making here. But the
names behind these claims. These are the engineers who delivered the Apple SoC, which is pretty good by any real measurement. They probably can deliver a new chip with amazing capabilities. And now they're beginning to market some bold claims.
----------
With that being said, the marketing blogpost is clearly shilling and was a waste of my time IMO. I'd be more interested if they were pushing out some details about why they think their chip is better (a larger decoder? A new methodology all together? A stepwise evolution that other companies haven't figured out yet? Etc. etc.). They're in the "generating hype" stage of their company, which is (unfortunately) necessary for funding these days.