Majority of Puget Systems' Workstations Ship with AMD Processors

[Richards]

II think you missed one thing, popularity by producing shit will get you both 'poop'ularity and reputation, just not the reputation you actually wanted. In the end, we can agree the Puget has more than a good reputation with its products.

Amd will never break 50% market share in the real world you can print that

 

[lexluthermiester]

Amd will never break 50% market share in the real world you can print that

A lot of people said that about ARM CPU's, yet here we are with ARM CPU's being the most common type of CPU on the planet.

 

[DeathtoGnomes]

Amd will never break 50% market share in the real world you can print that

Eventually they will, it takes time, Intel didnt get where they are overnight, then again Intel didnt have competent competition for over a decade. The landscape is changing, and AMD has a riding lawnmower while Intel dropped the ball. Or do you need to be reminded of the 10mm disaster?

 

[ARF]

IIRC, some random tools like "rr" (https://rr-project.org/) only work on Intel. If you have a continuous integration system (like... a programmer server: compiles, tests, etc. etc.) that uses rr inside, Intel HEDT is what you want.

I admit its an obscure case but... random things still happen like that.

If you move one of the "r" in front of the first "o" in "tools", you will get quite a legit explanation of why they "only work on Intel".

 

[Auer]

AMD's biggest problem atm is Fab capacity.

It is likely not going to change anytime soon either.
Intel will always beat AMD as far as product availability goes.

 

[Richards]

A lot of people said that about ARM CPU's, yet here we are with ARM CPU's being the most common type of CPU on

AMD's biggest problem atm is Fab capacity.

It is likely not going to change anytime soon either.
Intel will always beat AMD as far as product availability goes.

They wont beat intel because they poverty stricken on node capacity they have to have they plates out for tsmc to feed them

 

[lexluthermiester]

@Richards
Your quote didn't have a response. Did you want to say something?

 

[claes]

It does; beneath your quote

 

[dragontamer5788]

Eventually they will, it takes time, Intel didnt get where they are overnight, then again Intel didnt have competent competition for over a decade. The landscape is changing, and AMD has a riding lawnmower while Intel dropped the ball. Or do you need to be reminded of the 10mm disaster?

Market share is just % sold per quarter.

Yeah it takes time to build because AMD doesn't want to risk building too many CPUs but it's not too difficult to shift market share (remember Blackberry?)