- Joined
- Feb 20, 2019
- Messages
- 8,284 (3.93/day)
System Name | Bragging Rights |
---|---|
Processor | Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz |
Motherboard | It has no markings but it's green |
Cooling | No, it's a 2.2W processor |
Memory | 2GB DDR3L-1333 |
Video Card(s) | Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz) |
Storage | 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3 |
Display(s) | 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz |
Case | Veddha T2 |
Audio Device(s) | Apparently, yes |
Power Supply | Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger |
Mouse | MX Anywhere 2 |
Keyboard | Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all) |
VR HMD | Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though.... |
Software | W10 21H1, barely |
Benchmark Scores | I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000. |
They were developed simultaneously in isolation and both hit the market at about the same time.You literally just described the Nidec... how can you say the Noctua isn't a copy of the Nidecs rofl
https://noctua.at/en/nf-a12x25-interview-lars-stromback details the differences and there's no doubt to me that they are not copies of each other. The rotors, the hubs, the colours, the frame design - they are all different enough that nobody is going to confuse the Nidec GT with the NF-A12x unless they are being deliberately obtuse.
The real kicker here is use of Sterrox in the Toughfan. Sterrox is a Noctua trademark and it looks like after 4 years of Sterrox research, Thermaltake just copied the Noctua Sterrox rotor, almost exactly. Phanteks are the only other company that have used glassfibre-reinforced composite rotors and whilst they ape the performance claims of Noctua's NF-A12x in minimising the gap between the rotor tips and the frame, the Phanteks T30 looks nothing like the Noctua.
Last edited: