• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

SiSoftware Compiles Early Performance Preview of the Intel Core i9-12900K

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
17,769 (2.42/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
It's not every day that a software company that specializes in benchmarking software decides to compile the performance data of unreleased products found in their online database, but this is what SiSoftware just did for the Intel Core i9-12900K. So far, it's a limited set of tests that have been run on the CPU and what we're looking at here is a set of task specific benchmarks. SiSoftware doesn't provide any system details, so take these numbers for what they are.

The benchmarks consist of three categories, Vector SIMD Native, Cryptographic Native and Financial Analysis Native. Not all tests have been run on the Core i9-12900K and SiSoftware themselves admit that they don't have enough data points to draw any final conclusions. Unlike other supposedly leaked benchmark figures, the Core i9-12900K doesn't look like a clear winner here, as it barely beats the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X in some tests, while it's beaten by it and even the Core i9-11900K in other tests. It should be noted that the Core i9-11900K does use AVX512 where supported which gives it a performance advantage to the other CPUs in some tests. We'll let you make up your own mind here, but one thing is certain, we're going to have to wait for proper reviews before the race is over and a winner is crowned.

Update: As the original article was taken down and there were some useful references in it, you can find a screen grab of it here.


View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
348 (0.09/day)
Location
Marabá - Pará - Brazil
System Name KarymidoN TitaN
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard ASUS TUF X570
Cooling Custom Watercooling Loop
Memory 2x Kingston FURY RGB 16gb @ 3200mhz 18-20-20-39
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 GAMING X 8GB
Storage Kingston NV2 1TB| 4TB HDD
Display(s) 4X 1080P LG Monitors
Case Aigo Darkflash DLX 4000 MESH
Power Supply Corsair TX 600
Mouse Logitech G300S
as expected tbh.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
Good scores, I'm still a bit iffy with the big.Little setup on Windows!

Also the dual ddr4/5 support is a definite plus, but will be interesting how many mobos actually support it.

The latest setting under win11 (build 22000.194) ~
Screenshot (28).png
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
2,159 (0.76/day)
Location
Tanagra
System Name Budget Box
Processor Xeon E5-2667v2
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Pro
Cooling Some cheap tower cooler, I dunno
Memory 32GB 1866-DDR3 ECC
Video Card(s) XFX RX 5600XT
Storage WD NVME 1GB
Display(s) ASUS Pro Art 27"
Case Antec P7 Neo
Also the dual ddr4/5 support is a definite plus, but will be interesting how many mobos actually support it.
In all my years, I can’t recall many boards supporting 2 kinds of memory. Granted, I might have missed something! The last time I could recall, it was when SDRAM came out over 25 years ago. I had a board that supported both RAM and SDRAM, though you could only use one or the other. Usually the dual support means the CPU will support both, but it’s vendor’s choice on which one to implement. I think Apollo Lake also had DDR3/DDR4 support, but no boards supported both. It would probably be a really complex design, too.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.20/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
Soo Avx 512 = win


Anything else = Fail

Puts the geekbench and Avx edition cinebench scores in proper perspective.

Intel clearly hopes we'll ditch anything not avx512, doubtful.

And clearly a return of Intel's artful Dodger testing, independent reviews only please because Intel's blurb isn't worth the typing.
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
4,625 (0.92/day)
In all my years, I can’t recall many boards supporting 2 kinds of memory. Granted, I might have missed something! The last time I could recall, it was when SDRAM came out over 25 years ago. I had a board that supported both RAM and SDRAM, though you could only use one or the other. Usually the dual support means the CPU will support both, but it’s vendor’s choice on which one to implement. I think Apollo Lake also had DDR3/DDR4 support, but no boards supported both. It would probably be a really complex design, too.
There have been motherboards at transitions which supported both outgoing and incoming memory on same board. But those always were niche boards allowing users to use old RAM while offering option to get new RAM when it gets cheaper.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
In all my years, I can’t recall many boards supporting 2 kinds of memory. Granted, I might have missed something! The last time I could recall, it was when SDRAM came out over 25 years ago. I had a board that supported both RAM and SDRAM, though you could only use one or the other. Usually the dual support means the CPU will support both, but it’s vendor’s choice on which one to implement. I think Apollo Lake also had DDR3/DDR4 support, but no boards supported both. It would probably be a really complex design, too.
Well that's kind of the point ~ it's (mostly) useless unless mobos support it & even then it could be sketchy if not implemented properly!
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
28,260 (6.75/day)
What I'm reading from the numbers above is that AMD's 12core Ryzen is faster than Intel's new hybrid 16core design. Just throwing it out there.. Me thinks this new scheme is not as good a performer as Intel wants it to be.

Is just me or those images show that the 5900 wins on 99% of the tests by a large margin?
It's not just you, that's what the images clearly show.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
28,260 (6.75/day)
To be fair, SiSoftware benches are multi-thread friendly.
While true, all of the subject CPUs are high core count and the 12core is beating out a 16 core. Whether or not Intel has hit the mark they were aiming for is anyone's guess, but the Ryzen is the clear victor here. Now for some other benchmarks... Passmark, Cinebench, 3DMark... These results are needed to gain a bigger picture.
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
64 (0.03/day)
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.20/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Messages
143 (0.08/day)
System Name Mirkwood
Processor AMD RYZEN 7 3800X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Crosshair VII Hero (Wi-Fi) AM4 AMD X470
Cooling Noctua D15S with additional Noctua NF-A12x25 FLX fan
Memory G.SKILL Flare X Series CL16 3200Mhz 16GB (4 x 8GB)
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE Radeon RX 570 DirectX 12 GV-RX570GAMING-4GD 4GB
Storage Crucial MX500 M.2 2280 500GB SATA III; WD Black 1TB Performance Desktop Hard Disk Drive
Display(s) Philips 246E9QDSB 24" Frameless Monitor, Full HD IPS, 129% sRGB, 75Hz, FreeSync
Case Corsair Graphite Series 780T
Audio Device(s) Klipsch R-41PM powered monitors and SVS SB-2000 sub
Power Supply Corsair HX650
Mouse Logitech Wireless Performance Mouse MX
Keyboard Old Logitech keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro 64Bit
What I'm reading from the numbers above is that AMD's 12core Ryzen is faster than Intel's new hybrid 16core design. Just throwing it out there.. Me thinks this new scheme is not as good a performer as Intel wants it to be.


It's not just you, that's what the images clearly show.
Well, you have to give Intel and MS time to optimize for the new design even though the design style has existed for some time in the mobile space. Zen wasn't so impressive at launch with issues that it had when it was first released, but software has been better optimized as of late whereas it was already optimized for Intel at the time.
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2017
Messages
136 (0.05/day)
This is the most misleading benchmark I've ever seen. SIMD for a non-HPC computer + Cryptography that is usually done by integrated accelarators + God knows what financial analysis means. Geekbench would look like the embodiment of justice compared to this.

It's okay to have only garbage data, but it's not okay to pretend them to be groundbreaking and spread them.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 12, 2017
Messages
127 (0.05/day)
Location
Dubai, UAE
System Name The Nomad
Processor Ryzen 5 5600
Motherboard Asrock B550M Phantom Gaming ITX
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 240
Memory 2x8GB Patriot 4400MHz DDR4
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700 Evoke OC w/ Arctic Accelero Xtreme IV
Storage 1TB A-Data SX8200Pro, 4TB WD Blue HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte M27Q 27"
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) Epos H6 Pro
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard Logitech G815
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
In all my years, I can’t recall many boards supporting 2 kinds of memory. Granted, I might have missed something! The last time I could recall, it was when SDRAM came out over 25 years ago. I had a board that supported both RAM and SDRAM, though you could only use one or the other. Usually the dual support means the CPU will support both, but it’s vendor’s choice on which one to implement. I think Apollo Lake also had DDR3/DDR4 support, but no boards supported both. It would probably be a really complex design, too.
I have an ASRock N68C-GS FX that supports both DDR2/DDR3. It was due to it supporting both AM2+ and AM3 CPUs, 2 DIMMs were DDR2 and the other 2 were DDR3.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
8,219 (2.16/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF gaming B650
Cooling Artic Liquid Freezer 2 - 420mm
Memory G.Skill Sniper 32gb DDR5 6000
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 4070 ti super 16gb
Storage Samsung EVO 500gb & 1Tb, 2tb HDD, 500gb WD Black
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) - SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Steeseries Esports Wireless
Keyboard Corsair K100
Software windows 10 H
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
wasnt there a PR about the 12900 beating 5900x ? I dont see it.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
289 (0.06/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5900X
Motherboard MSI MAG X570 Tomahawk
Cooling Dual custom loops
Memory 4x8GB G.SKILL Trident Z Neo 3200C14 B-Die
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6800XT Reference
Storage ADATA SX8200 480GB, Inland Premium 2TB, various HDDs
Display(s) MSI MAG341CQ
Case Meshify 2 XL
Audio Device(s) Schiit Fulla 3
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex Titanium SE 1000W
Mouse Glorious Model D
Keyboard Drop CTRL, lubed and filmed Halo Trues
This is the most misleading benchmark I've ever seen. SIMD for a non-HPC computer + Cryptography that is usually done by integrated accelarators + God knows what financial analysis means. Geekbench would look like the embodiment of justice compared to this.

It's okay to have only garbage data, but it's not okay to pretend them to be groundbreaking and spread them.

Suddenly people are up in arms about Sandra, which has been around and in use for almost 25 years. There's plenty of information about what each benchmark entails available on their website if you actually want to find out.

Here's a screenshot of the whole article since it has been taken down, just in case more people want to claim things like it isn't optimized for Intel's hybrid architecture, or that the results are invalid because it's running on Windows 10, or whatever other justification they want to come up with beyond "the product isn't out yet."

 
Joined
Apr 29, 2020
Messages
141 (0.08/day)
I have an ASRock N68C-GS FX that supports both DDR2/DDR3. It was due to it supporting both AM2+ and AM3 CPUs, 2 DIMMs were DDR2 and the other 2 were DDR3.
I had a ECS Socket A board back in the day that supported DDR and SDR memory, same 2 and 2 DIMM setup. And even further back, Socket 3 (486) that had 4 30 pin SIMMs and a 72 pin SIMM during that transition.

It will depend on whether either Alder Lake or Zen4 include both DDR4 and DDR5 controllers on die.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.20/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
Suddenly people are up in arms about Sandra, which has been around and in use for almost 25 years. There's plenty of information about what each benchmark entails available on their website if you actually want to find out.

Here's a screenshot of the whole article since it has been taken down, just in case more people want to claim things like it isn't optimized for Intel's hybrid architecture, or that the results are invalid because it's running on Windows 10, or whatever other justification they want to come up with beyond "the product isn't out yet."

Agreed, it's been a substantial and reliable indicator of performance for a long time, I have used it on every Pc since core 2 era, and it scaled as it should have.
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
944 (0.20/day)
Location
Slovenia
System Name PC.
Processor i7 2600K 5.0Gh,i7 3770K 5.00Gh. EK, Liqed Coooleng
Motherboard P67A-UD7-B3 Gigabyte T.,ASUS,P8Z77-V PREMIUM,MAXIMUS V EXTRIME..
Cooling Liqed Cooleng ,EK Suprime LTX Nickel,EK for Motherboard,Aqua computer (WGA), Thermaltake .... 0i,
Memory G.SKILL F3-17600CL7-2GBPISG. 16GBSkill Sniper F3-17000CL94GBSR on 2400Hz 10-12-11-29 1
Video Card(s) GTX590 ,SLI ,POV TGT best 691Hz ,LiqedCoold,GTX480.....GTX1080MSI SeaHawkEK SLI
Storage OCZ-REVODRIVE 3-240GB,2xCrucialMX100.512.R-0,1x LMT-32L3m,3x 1TB-WD,1x;1x2TbSEAGATE1x2Tb Seagate
Display(s) DELL-U2412Mb,Samsung Synkmaster245B,HP ENVY 34c
Case Thermaltake, NZXT SWITCH 810SE
Audio Device(s) CREATIVE BLASTER X-Fi Titanium HD , AUNE T1MK2 TUBE USB
Power Supply ENERMAX Platimax 1500W,Thermaltake 1500W
Mouse VIPER V560,FUNC MS-3, Prestigio, R.A.T.E.7 and 5,LogitechG502,RAZER,Inperator.,dead...a.s.o.
Keyboard Trust ....LogotechG410
Software Windows7 64....
Benchmark Scores 3DMark Fire Strike 21.385 (37.234,11.828,7.176)
What is shown raises doubts about performance! Core i9-12900K. it is likely to shine only when using the actual advances brought by DDR5. He has nothing to show for now. Even the i9-11900K has more show for , with 8 cores less .:oops:
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2020
Messages
145 (0.09/day)
System Name Room Heater Pro
Processor i9-13900KF
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI
Cooling Corsair iCUE H170i ELITE CAPELLIX 420mm
Memory Corsair Vengeance Std PMIC, XMP 3.0 Black Heat spreader, 64GB (2x32GB), DDR5, 6600MT/s, CL 32, RGB
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC 24GB
Storage Kingston FURY Renegade Gen.4, 4TB, NVMe, M.2.
Display(s) ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG48UQ, 47.5", 4K, OLED, 138Hz, 0.1 ms, G-SYNC
Case Thermaltake View 51 TG ARGB
Power Supply Asus ROG Thor, 1200W Platinum
Mouse Logitech Pro X Superlight 2
Keyboard Logitech G213 RGB
VR HMD Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 11 23H2
Good scores, I'm still a bit iffy with the big.Little setup on Windows!

Also the dual ddr4/5 support is a definite plus, but will be interesting how many mobos actually support it.

The latest setting under win11 (build 22000.194) ~
Which tool did you use to get to those settings?
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
2,141 (0.53/day)
Location
Serbia
Processor Ryzen 5600
Motherboard X570 I Aorus Pro
Cooling Deepcool AG400
Memory HyperX Fury 2 x 8GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) RX 6700 10GB SWFT 309
Storage SX8200 Pro 512 / NV2 512
Display(s) 24G2U
Case NR200P
Power Supply Ion SFX 650
Mouse G703 (TTC Gold 60M)
Keyboard Keychron V1 (Akko Matcha Green) / Apex m500 (Gateron milky yellow)
Software W10
Considering Alder Lake was touted as the next coming of Jesus, these preliminary results don't look that impressive.
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
30 (0.01/day)
In all my years, I can’t recall many boards supporting 2 kinds of memory. Granted, I might have missed something! The last time I could recall, it was when SDRAM came out over 25 years ago. I had a board that supported both RAM and SDRAM, though you could only use one or the other. Usually the dual support means the CPU will support both, but it’s vendor’s choice on which one to implement. I think Apollo Lake also had DDR3/DDR4 support, but no boards supported both. It would probably be a really complex design, too.
The transition from 3rd to 4th gen Core had that option but it was mostly seen in server and embedded applications. You would build the mobo to support DDR3.

In consumer applications, the feature is mostly irrelevant because mobo's will just build around DDR5. Although there are exceptions as Muaadib pointed out.
 
Top