- Joined
- Nov 6, 2016
- Messages
- 1,692 (0.60/day)
- Location
- NH, USA
System Name | Lightbringer |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 7 2700X |
Motherboard | Asus ROG Strix X470-F Gaming |
Cooling | Enermax Liqmax Iii 360mm AIO |
Memory | G.Skill Trident Z RGB 32GB (8GBx4) 3200Mhz CL 14 |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire RX 5700XT Nitro+ |
Storage | Hp EX950 2TB NVMe M.2, HP EX950 1TB NVMe M.2, Samsung 860 EVO 2TB |
Display(s) | LG 34BK95U-W 34" 5120 x 2160 |
Case | Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic (White) |
Power Supply | BeQuiet Straight Power 11 850w Gold Rated PSU |
Mouse | Glorious Model O (Matte White) |
Keyboard | Royal Kludge RK71 |
Software | Windows 10 |
hahaha, I know right....that guy probably saw the one benchmark where alderlake MATCHED a 2990WX from three years ago on the Zen+ architecture and somehow extrapolates that to it BEATING a 32 core Zen3 threadripper....ISure bro.
Yeah....I just want to point out that Intel's R&D budget for 2020 was literally 6.5x more than AMD's, and Intel's 2020 Revenue ($78 Billion) is about 8x more than AMD's 2020 Revenue ($9.76 Billion)....so when intel doesn't deliver with literally a magnitude greater resources than AMD, there's no excuse for Intel, meanwhile AMD is working on a shoestring compared to Intel, and has been whipping them for several years now....which makes AMD's victories all that more impressive.....please, name any other business from any other industry that is BEATING a competitor that has a 6.5x greater R&D budget and an 8x greater Revenue stream. For that matter, Nvidia's R&D budget for 2020 was $4 billion, double that of AMD's, and AMD has to divide their R&D budget between GPUs and CPUs while Nvidia just spends it on GPUs, so it'd be more accurate to say Nvidia's R&D budget is more than 4x greater than AMD's (as I'm sure AMD spends more of their budget on x86 since that has a much larger T.A.M.), and AMD is still able to compete, and in a sane world where we could go on MSRP, AMD would be arguably offering a better value in each price tier.I just want to point out to the double standards here nothing else, If this happened to Intel, you could see hundreds of comments mocking them, but when it happens to AMD, all those fanboys runs out of excuses.
These things can happen in tech industry just very sad to see blind loyalty.
We live in a reality dominated by financial resources, and until you factor in those resources in assessing which company is doing better or worse, your assessment is divorced from reality....when you consider that AMD beats Intel and competes (and even beats in rasterization) against Nvidia, AMD's performance is more impressive than either of those companies. If AMD had Intel's financial resources in x86 and Nvidia's financial resources in dGPU, they'd have completely run away with it over the past few years.
How is it fanboyism when he is stating the fact that alderlake was beating a 3 year old Threadripper chip with Zen+ architecture (which literally represents a near 40% decrease in IPC vs Zen3)?....it seems more like fanboyism to be ignoring that fact like somebody around hereBoy, the fanboyism is running rampant around here! But the first dose of cure is fortunately just around the corner.