davido_labido
EKWB Rep
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2016
- Messages
- 103 (0.03/day)
System Name | my daily driver |
---|---|
Processor | 5960x |
Motherboard | EVGA X99 Classified |
Cooling | EKWB |
Memory | 32gb HyperX Predator |
Video Card(s) | 2 x 1080 |
Storage | 2 x 960 gb HyperX Savage + 1 480 gb hyperx predator |
Display(s) | ASUS swift + LG 24GM77-B |
Case | In Win 909 |
Audio Device(s) | Schiit modi + Vali (amp and dac |
Power Supply | EVGA 1300w |
Mouse | multiple |
Keyboard | planck |
Software | Win 10 |
What? The guys here are rather unbias, to the point where it can be frustrating, yet I welcome it. Without unbiased media, we won't see any issues before products are released. We are far happier for issues to be bought up with media samples as we usually have only made a single batch by then and we can rectify issues. If they are bias and don't tell us anything other than what we want to hear, we just get shafted when customers get the product.Case in point. Expect more responses like this as we transition away from advertising-centric sites to more unbiased ones.
For those younger members who don't understand, Techpowerup.com is primarily an AMD/Nvidia advertising site.
..and already under new unbiased management. Expect unbiased changes.
Can confirm, press releases just go to an inbox then basically get copied/pasted here. We send them the PR, we don't pay for it, it keeps you guys in the know and gives us a platform to do so. Many websites do the same as it is nice filler content and keeps people clicking. It is a win/win and we appreciate it!What?
I have been dealing with computers as an enthusiast since the late 90's. I would say with all my experience, TPU has been the least biased. Yeah, maybe the press release posts are nothing but adverts, but that is how they make money to stay afloat. Their testing methodology is still the best.
Youtubers on the other hand are abysmal for most part. There are good tubers around, but on average they are just giant advert videos.
Honestly, many tech sides don't allow for paid reviews - at all. Like, even if we want something reviewed quickly and we would like to pay to get it done (I must stress, not paying for a good review, but just to have a review done ASAP so we can get the product seen) the vast vast majority will turn it down and do it for free in the near future instead.Unbiased and opinion reviews are different then paid content.
Remember this. Lots of tech sites are strictly pay for a good review. It is just how it is. Anyone who reads content here regularly will know this isn't a issue at TPU.
The amount of times I reviewed something that clearly has flaws, only to find a perfect score from someone else makes me question the legitimacy of some sites. It's okay to have a opinion and be bias. I welcome those who have a different view as it broadens my own. But being paid for a good review is not okay. We as a community have so little left of legitment tech sites.
We might do something where we will pay for some kind of separate content, such as a giveaway or some advertising, and bundle the review in with that, but the content and the reviews are separate and on numerous occasions, we have had a review that isn't positive, alongside the paid content. Is it perfect? well, not to those who pay for it, but the integrety of many websites is worth more than the money we pay.
The people who usually give silly reviews saying it is perfect are usually unpaid, but want to continue relationships and think this is the way to do it. Or it's the first couple times they have earned money from a review.
I don't care if our reviews are not perfect, or even if we have a really negative one, as long as the conserns are genuine and the test scenarios are fair. A lot of reviewers (particularly ones that have had a little bit of success, but haven't quite mananged to figure out how to make it pay) seem to think that bias reviews will help them and I have called a couple of people out on them, especially when I see 'cons: NONE'. No product is perfect. I always tried to give at least 2 or 3 negatives to a product, even if they were just very small issues that had no real bearing on the quality or functionality.
I could rant about the industry for hours and hours, especially about how people seem to think, compared to what I have seen in my (almost) 10 years in the industry. Are there shady goings on? Oh, yes, 100%. Usually by the rather large names that don't care where $50,000 gets thrown.
There are many great websites and YouTube channels that do put in the work and do as much as they can to make sure they are non-bias. I know from working for TPU that here is one of them. If I ever had really negagtive or overly positive review, I would mention it to W1zzard or one of the team and they would deal with the fallout from it, or probe me to see if I have missed anything, just to make sure I wasn't missing something. As long as we were being honest, that's what mattered. I really do miss working for W1zzard, he was a very easy person to work for and the guys I have met from TPU have all had a similar mindset. I believe a bunch of others are similar though, it's just we only see the front end, rather than the big picture.