• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Prepares Raptor Lake Designs With 24 Cores and 32 Threads, More E-Cores This Time

AleksandarK

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
2,651 (0.99/day)
With the launch of Intel's Alder Lake processors, Intel has switched from a homogeneous to a heterogeneous design of processors, where smaller, high-efficiency cores are mixed with high-performance cores to create a highly efficient and high-performance processor for all kinds of workloads. And it seems like Intel is not over with adding more E-cores to its future products, as the latest leaks suggest. According to the BAPCO's Crossmark benchmark database, Intel's upcoming Raptor Lake processors will feature more E-cores than the high-performance P-cores in the SoC design. As to why this design choice is present, we are not sure and don't have a definitive answer.

E-Cores are suitable for background tasks, and adding more would potentially leave space for P-cores to do heavier workloads. In the benchmark submission, which is now offline, the samples used were a configuration with eight P-cores and sixteen E-cores. Since the big cores are hyperthreaded, it makes up for a total composition of 24 cores with 32 threads. The platform "RPL-S ADP-S DDR5 UDIMM OC CRB" was used with DDR5-4800 memory, indicating an early stage engineering sample with a probably unfinished memory controller. The Raptor Lake generation will also use LGA 1700 socket, DDR5 memory and be present in the desktop and mobile sector once it launches in Q4 of 2022. It will also use Intel's 7 semiconductor manufacturing process, similar to Alder Lake. The only difference with the next-generation design is the updated Raptor Cove core design that brings a significant IPC uplift.


View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
1,666 (0.78/day)
System Name Personal Gaming Rig
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Carbon
Cooling MO-RA 3 420
Memory 32GB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 ICHILL FROSTBITE ULTRA
Storage 4x 2TB Nvme
Display(s) Samsung G8 OLED
Case Silverstone FT04
For the same 12 ringbus slots I would rather take 12 P-cores.
 
Joined
Apr 17, 2021
Messages
567 (0.42/day)
System Name Jedi Survivor Gaming PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus TUF B650M Plus Wifi
Cooling ThermalRight CPU Cooler
Memory G.Skill 32GB DDR5-5600 CL28
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 3080 10GB
Storage 2TB Samsung 990 Pro SSD
Display(s) MSI 32" 4K OLED 240hz Monitor
Case Asus Prime AP201
Power Supply FSP 1000W Platinum PSU
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Asus Mechanical Keyboard
Looks like Intel isn't taking its foot off the gas. Intel already owns the budget and high end consumer market.
Intel has been behind for an entire year now. People literally say (like Dave2D) "too bad this laptop doesn't have AMD, it would have been worth buying". They don't own the market, the 5950x is still faster in productivity for example, AMD just needs a small price drop eventually when stock is more available.

Personally I'm not impressed with the e-cores in my 12700k. I'd rather have more P cores. I don't think the P cores use too much energy at reasonable clock speeds. In fact I was using all cores at 4.5ghz and only 120 watts. Plenty of room for 16 P cores at 250W. I don't find E cores compelling in a desktop. They only work well in the most ideal situations (like Cinebench). As long as E cores are cheap I suppose they make sense, but I'm not paying a lot for them. I don't think the i9 makes any sense. I would have bought a 12 P core i9 though. Not an 8.
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
1,457 (0.35/day)
Location
Australia
Looking forward to raptor lake, glad I didn't go with alder lake when moving from Zen+. Intel are not going to catch me out after my Lynnfield experience with them all those yrs ago again!
In the meantime, my rocket lake system is good enough for my gaming needs. Added benefit of maturing bios for my mobo & I'm finding even more OC headroom for the ram kits I have atm + the ease with which Intel extreme tuning app in windows for rocket lake is a great piece of software imo. The IMC on rocket lake is fantastic if tuned well!
2nd gen DDR5 IMC with raptor lake should be something certainly nice to look forward too in combo with the increase in ipc of its P-cores. :)
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
1,760 (1.02/day)
If Raptor Lake comes with the same Golden Cove P-Cores, I don't think adding more E-Cores will give it a big boost in performance. In cases where more cores is better, we may see some improvement. So this is more like a product for Intel to fend off AMD's quest to increase more cores. Alder Lake offers very good performance mainly because of the significant improvement from the Golden Cove cores, and those E-cores are just to prop up multicore performance as compared to AMD's Zen 3.

Intel has been behind for an entire year now. People literally say (like Dave2D) "too bad this laptop doesn't have AMD, it would have been worth buying". They don't own the market, the 5950x is still faster in productivity for example, AMD just needs a small price drop eventually when stock is more available.

Personally I'm not impressed with the e-cores in my 12700k. I'd rather have more P cores. I don't think the P cores use too much energy at reasonable clock speeds. In fact I was using all cores at 4.5ghz and only 120 watts. Plenty of room for 16 P cores at 250W. I don't find E cores compelling in a desktop. They only work well in the most ideal situations (like Cinebench). As long as E cores are cheap I suppose they make sense, but I'm not paying a lot for them. I don't think the i9 makes any sense. I would have bought a 12 P core i9 though. Not an 8.
If you ask me, all of Intel's products over the last few years are ok with power consumption. The problem is Intel is pushing the clockspeed very hard just to try and compete, and/or, retain their performance crown. Unfortunately, this is the same even for Alder Lake.

As to how much power the chip consumes, it really depends on the workload. I believe if you really push the cores hard, the power consumption will increase drastically, especially when you allow the chip to run infinite PL2 under load. I suspect 120W applies when you leave it to the Intel's recommended boost timing.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,946 (0.63/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
Looking forward to raptor lake, glad I didn't go with alder lake when moving from Zen+. Intel are not going to catch me out after my Lynnfield experience with them all those yrs ago again!
In the meantime, my rocket lake system is good enough for my gaming needs. Added benefit of maturing bios for my mobo & I'm finding even more OC headroom for the ram kits I have atm + the ease with which Intel extreme tuning app in windows for rocket lake is a great piece of software imo. The IMC on rocket lake is fantastic if tuned well!
2nd gen DDR5 IMC with raptor lake should be something certainly nice to look forward too in combo with the increase in ipc of its P-cores. :)

Zen 4 is going to have up to 50% perf increase with the stacked cache models. Intel isn't even on the radar.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
1,666 (0.78/day)
System Name Personal Gaming Rig
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Carbon
Cooling MO-RA 3 420
Memory 32GB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 ICHILL FROSTBITE ULTRA
Storage 4x 2TB Nvme
Display(s) Samsung G8 OLED
Case Silverstone FT04
Intel has been behind for an entire year now. People literally say (like Dave2D) "too bad this laptop doesn't have AMD, it would have been worth buying". They don't own the market, the 5950x is still faster in productivity for example, AMD just needs a small price drop eventually when stock is more available.

Personally I'm not impressed with the e-cores in my 12700k. I'd rather have more P cores. I don't think the P cores use too much energy at reasonable clock speeds. In fact I was using all cores at 4.5ghz and only 120 watts. Plenty of room for 16 P cores at 250W. I don't find E cores compelling in a desktop. They only work well in the most ideal situations (like Cinebench). As long as E cores are cheap I suppose they make sense, but I'm not paying a lot for them. I don't think the i9 makes any sense. I would have bought a 12 P core i9 though. Not an 8.

The primary reason they went for P/E-core config is current Intel ringbus architecture maxed out at 12 slots for CPU cores per ring
As demonstrated in the Xeon e5 v4 series.
And exactly the reason why they went for mesh architecture.

So they've made this P/E-core config to get "16 cores" within the architectural limit.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,842 (1.74/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name stress-less
Processor 9800X3D @ 5.42GHZ
Motherboard MSI PRO B650M-A Wifi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 64GB DDR5 6400 1:1 CL30-36-36-76 FCLK 2200
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse DeathadderV2 X Hyperspeed
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
I like the e cores after having used them. Maybe in the perfect no crapware or background apps bench setups used by reviews they don't make much sense, but for my use case they seem work great.

I've tested my max overclock on the 12600k at 5.4 ghz and 47 ring with e-cores off and my 24/7 5.3 ghz with 43 ring with e-cores on (overclocked to 4.3ghz) and having them on very noticeably eliminates intermittent stutters in cyberpunk and far cry 6. Could be just my setup but they seem to really work (especially because I'm too lazy to shut down all my background stuff).

Also I get 90% of 12700K multithread perf at ~186W which is pretty nice - not something 8 P cores by themselves can do afaik. 12900K with 10P cores would probably get lower multithreaded performance than current 12900k 8p/8e for 100W more draw, and 0 benefit in virtually any current real-world application.

Zen 4 is going to have up to 50% perf increase with the stacked cache models. Intel isn't even on the radar.

This is probably true. Stacked cache looks insane.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
4,902 (0.81/day)
Location
Multidimensional
System Name Boomer Master Race
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 8745H
Motherboard MinisForum 870 Slim Board
Cooling Mini PC Cooling
Memory Crucial 32GB 5600Mhz
Video Card(s) Radeon 780M
Storage Kingston 1TB SSD
Display(s) Sony 4K Bravia X85J 43Inch TV 120Hz
Case MinisForum 870 Slim Case
Audio Device(s) Built In Realtek Digital Audio HD
Power Supply 120w External Power Brick
Mouse Logitech G203 Lightsync
Keyboard Atrix RGB Slim Keyboard
VR HMD ( ◔ ʖ̯ ◔ )
Software Windows 11 Pro 64bit
Benchmark Scores Don't do them anymore.
Looks like Intel isn't taking its foot off the gas. Intel already owns the budget and high end consumer market.
Lmao no, I'd say maybe the budget market and mobile mindshare.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,842 (1.74/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name stress-less
Processor 9800X3D @ 5.42GHZ
Motherboard MSI PRO B650M-A Wifi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 64GB DDR5 6400 1:1 CL30-36-36-76 FCLK 2200
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse DeathadderV2 X Hyperspeed
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
Guy on top is always going to be an @$$h**e.

Hoping they start leap-frogging each other and we get sweet gear for cheap.

If not for AMD coming up would still be sitting on quad cores (maybe 6 cores on the i7), and if not for Intel coming back the 6600X would have been a 6 core zen 4 that cost $450.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2017
Messages
575 (0.21/day)
RPL extends the lead and Meteor Lake finishes off red team few months later. To make matters worse AMD has to decide how to make due with Samsung now that they’re getting booted out of TSMC.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2019
Messages
27 (0.01/day)
Location
United Kingdom
Processor 13700K 5.6GHz 8/16
Motherboard PRO Z690-A DDR4
Memory V10 2x16GB 4100MHz CL15
Video Card(s) 3080 Ti Gamerock
Benchmark Scores 3DMark CPU Pr. Test /No-L. Nitrogen 13700K @6.0 1300-14543 (5.)
For the same 12 ringbus slots I would rather take 12 P-cores.
Or 10 with additional 12 E-cores(or may even with 'only' 10).
Increase in the quantity of the stronger cores either way would make likely a bigger impact on performance.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
1,666 (0.78/day)
System Name Personal Gaming Rig
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Carbon
Cooling MO-RA 3 420
Memory 32GB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 ICHILL FROSTBITE ULTRA
Storage 4x 2TB Nvme
Display(s) Samsung G8 OLED
Case Silverstone FT04
Or 10 with an additional 12 E-cores(or may even with 'only' 10) Increase in the quantity of the stronger cores either way would make likely a bigger impact on performance.
They put 4 E-cores in a cluster so it will be 10+8 in your config.

Still, I would pick pure P-core config all-day.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
14,170 (3.82/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name H7 Flow 2024
Processor AMD 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus X570 Tough Gaming
Cooling Custom liquid
Memory 32 GB DDR4
Video Card(s) Intel ARC A750
Storage Crucial P5 Plus 2TB.
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Mouse Lenovo
Keyboard Eweadn Mechanical
Software W11 Pro 64 bit
You forgot to add Windows Enterprise Edition was used for the testing.
 
Joined
Aug 5, 2020
Messages
199 (0.12/day)
System Name BUBSTER
Processor I7 13700K (6.1 GHZ XTU OC)
Motherboard Z690 Gigabyte Aorus Elite Pro
Cooling Arctic Freezer II 360 RGB
Memory 32GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB DDR4 4800MHz 2x16GB
Video Card(s) Asus GeForce RTX 3070 Super Dual OC
Storage Kingston KC 3000 PCIE4 1Tb + 2 Kingston KC 3000 1TB PCIE4 RAID 0 + 4 TB Crucial gen 4 +12 TB HDD
Display(s) Sony Bravia A85 j OLED
Case Corsair Carbide Air 540
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar Essence STX II
Power Supply Corsair AX 850 Titanium
Mouse Corsair Gaming M65 Pro RGB + Razr Taipan
Keyboard Asus ROG Strix Flare Cherry MX Red + Corsair Gaming K65 lux RGB
Software Windows 11 Pro x64
I like the e cores after having used them. Maybe in the perfect no crapware or background apps bench setups used by reviews they don't make much sense, but for my use case they seem work great.

I've tested my max overclock on the 12600k at 5.4 ghz and 47 ring with e-cores off and my 24/7 5.3 ghz with 43 ring with e-cores on (overclocked to 4.3ghz) and having them on very noticeably eliminates intermittent stutters in cyberpunk and far cry 6. Could be just my setup but they seem to really work (especially because I'm too lazy to shut down all my background stuff).

Also I get 90% of 12700K multithread perf at ~186W which is pretty nice - not something 8 P cores by themselves can do afaik. 12900K with 10P cores would probably get lower multithreaded performance than current 12900k 8p/8e for 100W more draw, and 0 benefit in virtually any current real-world application.



This is probably true. Stacked cache looks insane.
at what voltage are you getting the 5.4 P 4.3 E?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,818 (1.33/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
For the same 12 ringbus slots I would rather take 12 P-cores.
For what use case? Honestly curious. From what we have seen so far 8 fast cores works well enough for gaming - even more so when there are more cores available (fast or not) - and 16 E-cores are going to be both faster and more efficient than 4 P-cores on well-threaded production applications.
 
Joined
Aug 5, 2020
Messages
199 (0.12/day)
System Name BUBSTER
Processor I7 13700K (6.1 GHZ XTU OC)
Motherboard Z690 Gigabyte Aorus Elite Pro
Cooling Arctic Freezer II 360 RGB
Memory 32GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB DDR4 4800MHz 2x16GB
Video Card(s) Asus GeForce RTX 3070 Super Dual OC
Storage Kingston KC 3000 PCIE4 1Tb + 2 Kingston KC 3000 1TB PCIE4 RAID 0 + 4 TB Crucial gen 4 +12 TB HDD
Display(s) Sony Bravia A85 j OLED
Case Corsair Carbide Air 540
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar Essence STX II
Power Supply Corsair AX 850 Titanium
Mouse Corsair Gaming M65 Pro RGB + Razr Taipan
Keyboard Asus ROG Strix Flare Cherry MX Red + Corsair Gaming K65 lux RGB
Software Windows 11 Pro x64
I can't complain (although more P cores would be great), on my 12700kWith intel XTU I was able to get 5.5 Ghz on core 0 / 1- 5.4Ghz on on core 2/3- 5.3 Ghz on 4/5 - and 5.2 Ghz on cores 6/7 and 4.2 Ghz on the E cores, i couldn't get anything higher than 5.2 Ghz P and 4.2 on the E cores stable in the Bios, even with a great AIO cooler and generous voltage, keeping Ring and cache at just 4.5 Ghz. Still messing with it some more hoping to get some more speed out of it with a nice set of great Samsung B Die DDR4 overclocked to 4800 mhz on CL 18.
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
1,194 (0.27/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 3700x
Motherboard asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming
Cooling Deepcool LS520 SE
Memory crucial ballistix 32Gb DDR4
Video Card(s) RTX 3070 FE
Storage WD sn550 1To/WD ssd sata 1To /WD black sn750 1To/Seagate 2To/WD book 4 To back-up
Display(s) LG GL850
Case Dan A4 H2O
Audio Device(s) sennheiser HD58X
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse MX master 3
Keyboard Master Key Mx
Software win 11 pro
For what use case? Honestly curious. From what we have seen so far 8 fast cores works well enough for gaming - even more so when there are more cores available (fast or not) - and 16 E-cores are going to be both faster and more efficient than 4 P-cores on well-threaded production applications.
I think that enthusiast are just generally pissed at the idea that they could have more P-core, especially when AMD is around. It doesn't matter If the 12900k can currently fight with the 5950x, they can't get out their head the idea that "it could have been so much faster with 16 P cores" even if the power consumption would have gone up like crazy.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
17,865 (2.87/day)
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K @ 4GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance Black DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Black 4TB | WD Blue 6TB
Display(s) ASUS ROG Strix XG27UQR (4K, 144Hz, G-SYNC compatible) | Asus MG28UQ (4K, 60Hz, FreeSync compatible)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair AX1600i
Mouse Microsoft Intellimouse Pro - Black Shadow
Keyboard Yes
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Yay, great, more e cores! :rolleyes: This sucks.

AMD need to give them a good kicking with all-performance cores then Intel will stop with these games.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,503 (3.27/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
Alder Lake is already catastrophically power inefficient and they've decided the best thing is to add even more cores ?
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
1,227 (0.50/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
Memory 32Gb G-Skill Trident Z Neo @3806MHz C14
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX2070
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 1TB
Display(s) Samsung G9 49" Curved Ultrawide
Case Cooler Master Cosmos
Audio Device(s) O2 USB Headphone AMP
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Cherry MX
Software Windows 11
I'll take this as confirmation of AMD putting 24 cores on the desktop next year, and Intel only able to answer with CPU cores from 8+ years ago.

24 Zen4 cores up against 8 Intel P cores, no chance. And we all know that AMD could put 32 cores on the desktop if it's needed.

It's also confirmation that Intel can't use more than 8 P cores, due to thermal limits. Oops Intel, looks like your new architecture is a hot bust.

I had to laugh when I saw LTT's Intel 12900 shill chiller video, that CPU was sucking down well over 420 Watts, and was still thermal throttling during the benchmark, whilst using a 3KW Aircon unit to cool it! They only got it to 5.3GHz all P core OC. The crappy E cores were at 4.2GHz I believe. Yes it performs well, but when you look at it, it's an architectural dead end, unless they can get it on a more advanced production node. Too hot, to power hungry.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
1,666 (0.78/day)
System Name Personal Gaming Rig
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Carbon
Cooling MO-RA 3 420
Memory 32GB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 ICHILL FROSTBITE ULTRA
Storage 4x 2TB Nvme
Display(s) Samsung G8 OLED
Case Silverstone FT04
For what use case? Honestly curious. From what we have seen so far 8 fast cores works well enough for gaming - even more so when there are more cores available (fast or not) - and 16 E-cores are going to be both faster and more efficient than 4 P-cores on well-threaded production applications.

For all use cases.

Speaking about production applications.
Their CPU for production applications a.k.a Sapphire Rapids retains a pure P-core design.

I don't think intel's p+e-core design is ready for production applications right now.
Since they are not going to do it in the server market , hence lack of confidence / lack of optimization.

I won't put any risk running my production software on beta testing hardware and software, which this AlderLake +DDR5+WIN11 combo really is.
 
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Messages
322 (0.16/day)
Location
Bulgaria
Processor 6700K
Motherboard M8G
Cooling D15S
Memory 16GB 3k15
Video Card(s) 2070S
Storage 850 Pro
Display(s) U2410
Case Core X2
Audio Device(s) ALC1150
Power Supply Seasonic
Mouse Razer
Keyboard Logitech
Software 22H2
RPL extends the lead and Meteor Lake finishes off red team few months later. To make matters worse AMD has to decide how to make due with Samsung now that they’re getting booted out of TSMC.
@dicktracy Thank you for my new signature. I've always wondered what put in there.
 
Top