- Joined
- Sep 14, 2020
- Messages
- 722 (0.41/day)
- Location
- Greece
System Name | Office / HP Prodesk 490 G3 MT (ex-office) |
---|---|
Processor | Intel 13700 (90° limit) / Intel i7-6700 |
Motherboard | Asus TUF Gaming H770 Pro / HP 805F H170 |
Cooling | Noctua NH-U14S / Stock |
Memory | G. Skill Trident XMP 2x16gb DDR5 6400MHz cl32 / Samsung 2x8gb 2133MHz DDR4 |
Video Card(s) | Asus RTX 3060 Ti Dual OC GDDR6X / Zotac GTX 1650 GDDR6 OC |
Storage | Samsung 2tb 980 PRO MZ / Samsung SSD 1TB 860 EVO + WD blue HDD 1TB (WD10EZEX) |
Display(s) | Eizo FlexScan EV2455 - 1920x1200 / Panasonic TX-32LS490E 32'' LED 1920x1080 |
Case | Nanoxia Deep Silence 8 Pro / HP microtower |
Audio Device(s) | On board |
Power Supply | Seasonic Prime PX750 / OEM 300W bronze |
Mouse | MS cheap wired / Logitech cheap wired m90 |
Keyboard | MS cheap wired / HP cheap wired |
Software | W11 / W7 Pro ->10 Pro |
Agreed, except maybe for the 12 P-core limit that @Crackong mentioned, but unfortunately the enthusiast DIY segment is too small to be a decisive factor. Besides the performance is here e.g. 1)for MT CPU applications and 2)for gaming + streaming Alder Lake has a huge architectural advantage (I guess AMD will fix this, but probably on the new architecture). For more than 8 cores (IF needed) I would also prefer 12 P-cores, but in reality I could only complain about MB and especially DDR5 pricing.I think that enthusiast are just generally pissed at the idea that they could have more P-core, especially when AMD is around. It doesn't matter If the 12900k can currently fight with the 5950x, they can't get out their head the idea that "it could have been so much faster with 16 P cores" even if the power consumption would have gone up like crazy.