- Joined
- May 22, 2015
- Messages
- 14,050 (3.96/day)
| Processor | Intel i5-12600k |
|---|---|
| Motherboard | Asus H670 TUF |
| Cooling | Arctic Freezer 34 |
| Memory | 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V |
| Video Card(s) | EVGA GTX 1060 SC |
| Storage | 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500 |
| Display(s) | Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w |
| Case | Raijintek Thetis |
| Audio Device(s) | Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D |
| Power Supply | Seasonic 620W M12 |
| Mouse | Logitech G502 Proteus Core |
| Keyboard | G.Skill KM780R |
| Software | Arch Linux + Win10 |
I believe it matters little what the actual numbers represent. What we were trying to establish is durability of 3D TLC vs planar MLC. Whatever the testing conditions were, I believe we have been shown how these compare with each other under similar circumstances.Yeah, I agree that number does look a tad high, but Micron says more than 10K P/E cycles and that data is a few years old as well. The 20K figure seems to be related to some "industrial" 3D TLC NAND flash and might not translate directly to SSDs.
TLC 3D NAND Flash: High-performance, cost-effective automotive solutions
NAND-based solutions are ubiquitous for cloud storage, but automotive solutions seem to be taking a different evolutionary path.www.micron.com