• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Dell Launches new 4K UltraSharpScreens with IPS Black Technology

Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
3,890 (0.82/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory Team Group Dark Pro 8Pack Edition 3600Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 FE
Storage Kingston A2000 1TB + Seagate HDD workhorse
Display(s) Samsung 50" QN94A Neo QLED
Case Antec 1200
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-850
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 11
All this talk of black makes me think of Johnny Nice Painter.
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
1,759 (1.02/day)
Promoting "black levels" would be inherently misleading, as they're relative to the brightness setting, and any absolute measurement could easily be gamed by making some uselessly dark 0% backlight setting if that's what you wanted. The relevant data is found in the 2000:1 contrast ratio, which is ~2x higher than what most IPS panels can produce, indicating lower black levels overall (as increasing brightness would also increase the black level on any conventional panel this will never increase contrast meaningfully).

A 2x increase in contrast essentially means this can display one more stop of dynamic range. That's pretty significant, going from the ~10 stops of 1000:1 to 11. It's still not the >13 needed for real HDR, but it's a marked improvement, and one that will be easily perceptible.
Yes, that is my understanding that the black level is tied to brightness level, though I am somewhat skeptical since this is also and edge lit display. Looking forward to see the product though.
 

WGKing

New Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2022
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
Hate to disappoint, but even Ultrasharp isn't spared the post-pandemic QC of other brands. At one point I tried to get a U2717D, twice - both returned for horrid uniformity. Dell makes no guarantee as to uniformity on these panels, but they do have a relatively stringent dead pixel policy iirc (take note, MSI and Gigabyte).

I do have a U2515H across the pond though, and it is a flawless monitor. I have a S2721DGF now and it's good, gotten better with time - its uniformity issues are less to do with Dell and more inherent to the LG 27GL850 panel it's using.

That said, it doesn't change that Dell is head and shoulders above everyone else when it comes to warranty, support and return policy on its higher end monitors (Ultrasharp and higher end gaming monitors have the same premium warranty and returns). And in a panel market where you're more likely to repeatedly play the try-it-and-return-it lottery than get a good panel, that return policy is worth more than anything else. Normally only Amazon and brick-and-mortar stores are that generous.

To get guaranteed uniformity (or at least better, with software to mitigate it), you need to at least step up to a pro-line BenQ (SW270C, SW271) or high end Eizo. Think the top Asus ProArts too maybe. All of which are Adobe RGB panels, cost as much as a GPU, and aimed at pros with colour accuracy needs.

The Ultrasharps usually have actually good accuracy out of the box, and respond well to proper calibration as well.

Benq SW line is garbage. They get "aceptable" color uniformity with agressive uniformity correction that drops contrast bellow 700:1 at D65 white (user cannot turn it off).
Eizo gets perfect color uniformity with no compensation, and very good brightness uniformity with uniformity compensation and contrast drop.
The outsiders in my generalization are CS2740 and SW271C which have poorer contrast than other CS models, although Eizo model does better than Benq... and the fact that Eizo software actually works.

Asus ProArt AdobeRGB widegamuts were and are the worst models in the market with extremely poor non correctable color uniformity, and uniformity compensation only corrected brightness. Also their HW calibration software sucks, a total failure. The outsider in this generalization is Asus PA32UCG which seems to have (a high chance in QC lottery to) an astonishing quality, contrast and color uniformity... although I have my fears about Asus software and their support.
Like Dell in the past, Asus mixes in the ProArt line very good sRGB IPS with their AdobeRGB garbage, hence "ProArt" line means a lot of things and may mislead public if we label the whole line as a block.

Also you are making a comparison with office grade from Dell (sRGB or P3), "U", the models in this article, instead with Dell "UP" line (AdobeRGB and P3) which should be equivalent to Benq SW / Asus ProArt (AdobeRGB widegamut) lines. UP line have uniformity compnesation. It's true that 10 years ago "U" line was both office and photo edition line with good sRGB IPS and widegamut (AdobeRGB type) IPS, like current Asus ProArt.

A final note. Panels are not AdobeRGB or sRGB or P3 (unless you go to OLED AMOLED domain). Display colorspace is given by the LED used in rear backlight, by its spectral power distribution.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
7,762 (2.79/day)
Location
Back in Norway
System Name Hotbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 110/95/110, PBO +150Mhz, CO -7,-7,-20(x6),
Motherboard ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax
Cooling LOBO + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14
Memory 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14 @3800c15
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UC@2250MHz max @~200W
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro
Display(s) Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary
Case SSUPD Meshlicious
Audio Device(s) Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Keychron K3/Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps
Software Windows 10 Pro
Yes, that is my understanding that the black level is tied to brightness level, though I am somewhat skeptical since this is also and edge lit display. Looking forward to see the product though.
The type of backlight doesn't really affect static, panel-derived contrast - that's just a measurement of how well the liquid crystal array is able to block out the backlight. Whether that light is coming from a diffused and redirected edge-mounted LED array or some sort of direct backlighting is irrelevant to this measurement. Of course some sort of FALD would allow for drastically higher dynamic contrast, but even then a higher native panel contrast ratio would be highly beneficial in minimizing bloom in brighter lighting zones.
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
3,413 (0.99/day)
System Name M3401 notebook
Processor 5600H
Motherboard NA
Memory 16GB
Video Card(s) 3050
Storage 500GB SSD
Display(s) 14" OLED screen of the laptop
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores 3050 scores good 15-20% lower than average, despite ASUS's claims that it has uber cooling.
Cool, now you only need to tile four of those next to each other to get a comparable screen size.
Welp, 48" OLEDs are out in the wilds for a while and 40" is inbound.

Perhaps I can buy one and slice it intto 4 monitors of Dell's size.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,836 (3.96/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
A final note. Panels are not AdobeRGB or sRGB or P3 (unless you go to OLED AMOLED domain). Display colorspace is given by the LED used in rear backlight, by its spectral power distribution.
Technically correct, but irrelevant since you cannot buy the panel and backlight separately.
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
17,758 (2.42/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
I disagree with this point.

Content creation is pushing into the 120hz arena and this display would be ill equipped to handle 4k-120hz. And even though 1000/8=125, there are processing and panel latency's to consider. Because of the 8ms pixel response time, the panel will be able to do 4k60hz fine, but little above that. Couple this with the display menu controls being on the back instead of the front and the USB ports being placed in very poor locations, this is an all around design failure for Dell. They'll be asking a premium price for a subpar product. Not acceptable.
I said "it most likely doesn't matter much." I didn't say it was irrelevant.

I love having the controls on the back of my display and have had that on several different displays, it's really not an issue and takes a whole 30 seconds to get used to.
I hate the capacitive touch button on my old U2515H, as they don't respond one time out of three.
Don't see the issue with the USB port placement either, fairly normal, plus you have two ports accessible at the front.
Each to their own I guess.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
1,227 (0.50/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
Memory 32Gb G-Skill Trident Z Neo @3806MHz C14
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX2070
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 1TB
Display(s) Samsung G9 49" Curved Ultrawide
Case Cooler Master Cosmos
Audio Device(s) O2 USB Headphone AMP
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Cherry MX
Software Windows 11
This monitor looked great, stopped reading at 60Hz.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
7,762 (2.79/day)
Location
Back in Norway
System Name Hotbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 110/95/110, PBO +150Mhz, CO -7,-7,-20(x6),
Motherboard ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax
Cooling LOBO + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14
Memory 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14 @3800c15
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UC@2250MHz max @~200W
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro
Display(s) Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary
Case SSUPD Meshlicious
Audio Device(s) Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Keychron K3/Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps
Software Windows 10 Pro
Welp, 48" OLEDs are out in the wilds for a while and 40" is inbound.

Perhaps I can buy one and slice it intto 4 monitors of Dell's size.
At 1080p that wouldn't be a particularly good experience either, but be my guest I guess? 48" is far too large for desk usage outside of a few niche use cases, and even 40" is an ergonomic nightmare for the vast majority of users. 32" is about as large as you can go for most users on most desks without incurring excessive neck and eye strain, or necessitating moving the monitor further away than what is ideal or making other ergonomic concessions.

So, until we have 27-32" 2160p OLEDs at prices that somewhat ordinary humans can afford, this looks pretty decent for what it's intended for.
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
3,413 (0.99/day)
System Name M3401 notebook
Processor 5600H
Motherboard NA
Memory 16GB
Video Card(s) 3050
Storage 500GB SSD
Display(s) 14" OLED screen of the laptop
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores 3050 scores good 15-20% lower than average, despite ASUS's claims that it has uber cooling.
At 1080p that wouldn't be a particularly good experience either, but be my guest I guess?
The only reason I've picked 2.8k 14" screen over 1080p 15" screen (both OLED), was that I liked 16:10 and smaller size more than 16:9 and bigger size.

Now you could argue, that 15" is notably smaller and hence different, fair enough, but note how Dell's offering is tightly sandwiched on both higher PPI and lower PPI ends, not just sizes.

OLED notebooks were also a $2.5k+ thing just recently and today, the overblown "burn in" myth is perhaps what stops home OLED monitor market from exploding (I was shocked by the number of people who were looking for notebooks regarding OLED screen as a minus)
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
7,762 (2.79/day)
Location
Back in Norway
System Name Hotbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 110/95/110, PBO +150Mhz, CO -7,-7,-20(x6),
Motherboard ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax
Cooling LOBO + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14
Memory 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14 @3800c15
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UC@2250MHz max @~200W
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro
Display(s) Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary
Case SSUPD Meshlicious
Audio Device(s) Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Keychron K3/Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps
Software Windows 10 Pro
The only reason I've picked 2.8k 14" screen over 1080p 15" screen (both OLED), was that I liked 16:10 and smaller size more than 16:9 and bigger size.

Now you could argue, that 15" is notably smaller and hence different, fair enough, but note how Dell's offering is tightly sandwiched on both higher PPI and lower PPI ends, not just sizes.

OLED notebooks were also a $2.5k+ thing just recently and today, the overblown "burn in" myth is perhaps what stops home OLED monitor market from exploding (I was shocked by the number of people who were looking for notebooks regarding OLED screen as a minus)
I entirely agree that it's great that we're seeing affordable OLED notebooks start to appear, but AFAIK those tend to use display tech that isn't really suitable to scaling to larger sizes, whether that's due to unusual subpixel arrangements that would become far too visible or just production related issues (difficulty scaling to large panel sizes without defects etc.). Burn-in is still an issue though - it's not as bad as many people think, but it will happen eventually, and unlike TVs, PCs have essentially zero effective mitigations that don't require significant user effort (pixel shift won't help you from burning in your taskbar icons; dimming on idle won't work for a PC; selective "logo" (icon/UI) dimming would likely harm usability as icons and UI elements are actively viewed unlike TV channel logos; hiding the taskbar and frequently moving your windows is a lot of effort that mainly postpones the inevitable). But ultimately this depends on a lot of factors - usage patterns, the user's tolerance for burn-in artifacts, their expectation of device longeivty, warranty terms and ease of repair, etc. Far too many variables for this to be a reason to avoid the panels outright, but it's something that one needs to factor into any purchase decision. If you tend to replace your laptop every 3 years it's not likely to matter; if you want to keep it for a decade that's likely a bad idea. I would love an OLED laptop myself - I keep them a long time, but don't use them that frequently - but I wouldn't go anywhere near it for my main desktop monitor with current OLED tech. QD-OLED might do the trick there though, as that promises another jump over current solutions in terms of subpixel lifespan.

But we're veering way, way off topic here. The point still stands that there are no desktop display sized OLED panels available in sane price categories, so that point is moot. I'm hopeful that this will change soon, but I'm not crossing my fingers. Desktop displays sell in such low volumes (compared to phones, tablets, laptops and TVs) that they're always the last market to get fancy new tech.

As for what dell is offering here in terms of size and PPI, I don't see your point - these are standard sizes and resolutions. Nothing unusual about any of this. That doesn't change the fact that comparing these desktop-sized displays to small laptop panels or large TV panels is ... well, a poor comparison in many ways.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
28,208 (6.74/day)
I said "it most likely doesn't matter much." I didn't say it was irrelevant.
I know, didn't mean any offense at all..

I love having the controls on the back of my display and have had that on several different displays
Really? I guess to each there own. Irritates me to no end.

Don't see the issue with the USB port placement either, fairly normal, plus you have two ports accessible at the front.
Each to their own I guess.
Yes, definitely an "agree to disagree" moment.
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2011
Messages
2,469 (0.51/day)
Location
Springfield, Vermont
System Name KHR-1
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard ASRock B550 PG Velocita (UEFI-BIOS P3.40)
Memory 32 GB G.Skill RipJawsV F4-3200C16D-32GVR
Video Card(s) Sparkle Titan Arc A770 16 GB
Storage Western Digital Black SN850 1 TB NVMe SSD
Display(s) Alienware AW3423DWF OLED-ASRock PG27Q15R2A (backup)
Case Corsair 275R
Audio Device(s) Technics SA-EX140 receiver with Polk VT60 speakers
Power Supply eVGA Supernova G3 750W
Mouse Logitech G Pro (Hero)
Software Windows 11 Pro x64 23H2
For the 32-inch version, based on the price, I rather save up for an OLED.
 
Top