G.Skill Announces DDR5-6000 CL30 64GB (32GB x2) Memory Kit

[btarunr]

G.SKILL International Enterprise Co., Ltd., the world's leading manufacturer of extreme performance memory and gaming peripherals, is delighted to announce the launch of a high-capacity, ultra-low-latency DDR5-6000 CL30 64 GB (32 GB x2) overclocked performance memory kit under the Trident Z5 family, designed for the latest 12th Gen Intel Core desktop processors and Intel Z690 chipset motherboard.

As the leader in developing high performance memory products, G.SKILL launches an all new high-capacity, ultra-low-latency dual-channel memory kit, rated at a blistering DDR5-6000 CL30-40-40-96 in 64 GB (32 GB x2) kit capacity. Using only the best-in-class memory components to achieve high-speeds with 32 GB module capacity, this extreme overclocked memory specification represents the next step in high-capacity DDR5 performance. The screenshot below shows this memory kit validated with the Intel Core i7-12700K processor and ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero motherboard.



Red Dot Design Award 2022
The all-new Trident Z5 RGB and Ripjaws S5 DDR5 memory series are the proud recipient of the Red Dot Award: Product Design 2022 for outstanding and innovative design. Both DDR5 memory series exceeded the juror panel's strict criteria and expectations in nine areas of product standards.

The DDR5-6000 CL30 64 GB (32 GB x2) memory specification under the Trident Z5 RGB series will be available in 2022 Q2 via G.SKILL worldwide distribution partners.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site

 

[watzupken]

The most important piece of information is missing. What’s the price?

Given how ridiculously overpriced DDR5 memory is at this point in time, this sort of exotic and high end RAMs may likely cost more than the CPU + mother board bundle.

 

[asdkj1740]

The most important piece of information is missing. What’s the price?

Given how ridiculously overpriced DDR5 memory is at this point in time, this sort of exotic and high end RAMs may likely cost more than the CPU + mother board bundle.

you should expect this type of kit would be much more expensive than 2 packs of 16G*2, simply because 32g*2 kit = verified but two packs of 2*16g in 16g*4 setup are not.

 

[ThrashZone]

Hi,
Not sure how they can claim "ultra low latency" without running a latency test and showing it 30-40-40 96 are just tested latency timings and seem typical for hynix loose as a goose

6000 at cl30 verses 3000 cl15 is mediocre at best in ddr4 land same as the last kit 6400 cl32 lol

How about running aida 64 and showing this ultra low latency.

Funny they have aida 64 open too

 

[asdkj1740]

Hi,
Not sure how they can claim "ultra low latency" without running a latency test and showing it 30-40-40 96 are just tested latency timings and seem typical for hynix loose as a goose

6000 at cl30 verses 3000 cl15 is mediocre at best in ddr4 land same as the last kit 6400 cl32 lol

How about running aida 64 and showing this ultra low latency.

Funny they have aida 64 open too
View attachment 241779

for the osd display on the top left corner.

 

[ThrashZone]

for the osd display on the top left corner.

Hi,
Which shows same thing as under it on the other mem test
And none show this "ultra low latency # " as stated in the article

 

[junglist724]

Hi,
Not sure how they can claim "ultra low latency" without running a latency test and showing it 30-40-40 96 are just tested latency timings and seem typical for hynix loose as a goose

6000 at cl30 verses 3000 cl15 is mediocre at best in ddr4 land same as the last kit 6400 cl32 lol

How about running aida 64 and showing this ultra low latency.

Funny they have aida 64 open too
View attachment 241779

First world latency is kind of meaningless when comparing DDR4 and DDR5 and it isn't representative of actual latency when under load. Intel memory latency checker actually checks latency when under different loads. These are the results I get on a couple of my machines. Under heavy loads DDR5 has lower latency.

9900K - 4000C17
Measuring Loaded Latencies for the system
Using all the threads from each core if Hyper-threading is enabled
Using Read-only traffic type
Inject  Latency Bandwidth
Delay   (ns)    MB/sec
==========================
00000   165.68    49340.6
00002   165.01    49374.5
00008   160.51    49251.6
00015   157.99    49293.0
00050   140.68    48834.0
00100   116.91    48605.5
00200    70.11    41206.0
00300    54.60    30216.0
00400    50.30    23396.2
00500    51.18    18983.2
00700    46.21    14322.5
01000    44.86    10557.1
01300    44.48     8487.4
01700    43.73     6874.0
02500    44.01     5146.2
03500    42.93     4135.1
05000    42.67     3354.4
09000    42.42     2540.5
20000    42.24     1979.8

12900k - 6200C32
Measuring Loaded Latencies for the system
Using all the threads from each core if Hyper-threading is enabled
Using Read-only traffic type
Inject  Latency Bandwidth
Delay   (ns)    MB/sec
==========================
00000   138.86    94911.2
00002   137.67    95062.7
00008   132.36    95048.7
00015   127.26    95018.2
00050   109.84    94738.0
00100   99.70    95056.9
00200   73.20    86546.1
00300   64.37    61858.1
00400   61.71    48823.9
00500   60.13    40213.8
00700   58.79    29914.4
01000   57.67    21767.6
01300   57.14    17229.5
01700   57.06    13555.9
02500   56.50     9693.6
03500   56.32     7302.2
05000   56.80     5452.9
09000   56.90     3548.2
20000   58.42     2189.6

 

[Ruru]

The most important piece of information is missing. What’s the price?

Given how ridiculously overpriced DDR5 memory is at this point in time, this sort of exotic and high end RAMs may likely cost more than the CPU + mother board bundle.

The high pricing always been the thing for an early adopter when a new RAM generation has been released.

 

[truehighroller1]

Don't try to use it on the apex motherboard early production 2021 boards lmfao.