- Joined
- Jan 28, 2020
- Messages
- 4,670 (2.60/day)
- Location
- Ex-usa | slava the trolls
Yes, but... I don't understand why I have to repeat this so many times, but there is no widely accepted standard for this. I've never said a standard couldn't be made - there are several that exist already! - I've said that there isn't one that a sufficient number of companies agree on using. Which makes their numbers incomparable. That is all I've been saying. If cooler maker A says 210W and B says 160W, that tells us nothing at all about their relative performance, because the way these numbers were arrived at were different. You can (typically) compare these numbers within company A's coolers or company B's coolers, but never across companies with any reliability. It doesn't matter that we could make a way for them to be comparable, as in the real world today, they aren't. Period.
But those different numbers are at least something. Better than nothing. Because there are small coolers good for up to 45 watts, and large coolers like this that a good for at least 125 watts. At least, the users will have a rough estimation and idea about what to expect.