- Joined
- Jan 14, 2019
- Messages
- 13,791 (6.26/day)
- Location
- Midlands, UK
Processor | Various Intel and AMD CPUs |
---|---|
Motherboard | Micro-ATX and mini-ITX |
Cooling | Yes |
Memory | Overclocking is overrated |
Video Card(s) | Various Nvidia and AMD GPUs |
Storage | A lot |
Display(s) | Monitors and TVs |
Case | The smaller the better |
Audio Device(s) | Speakers and headphones |
Power Supply | 300 to 750 W, bronze to gold |
Mouse | Wireless |
Keyboard | Mechanic |
VR HMD | Not yet |
Software | Linux gaming master race |
COD Warzone, aka. Generic Shooter 46978469? If that's AAA, then I'll stick to cat. B games, thanks.but it's not a AAA title then.
a AAA title uses the latest engine/graphics and have dozen of millions of dollars of development cost and huge dev teams, look at the games being developed with unreal engine 5.
So yes, you can judge a game by it's graphics if it's called "AAA".
this is not AAA, not even near, as everyone said before, graphics look extremely dated the lighting, animations and models are stiff, plasticky and not organic moving, it looks like a 10+ years old "AA" game and even then it's a "maybe", even COD WARZONE has better graphics and animation and it's a F2P MMFPS.