- Joined
- Aug 19, 2017
- Messages
- 2,664 (0.99/day)
In 2017, the semiconductor world was shocked to discover new vulnerabilities in modern Intel, AMD, and Arm processors. Dubbed Spectre and Meltdown, these exploits used cache-based side-channel attacks to steal information from the system. Today, we are getting a more advanced side-channel vulnerability hidden in every CPU capable of boosting frequencies. Interestingly called "Heartzbleed," the new exploit can steal secret AES cryptographic keys when observing CPU's boost frequencies. The attack works by monitoring the power signature of any cryptographic workload. As with any other element in a CPU, the workload's power varies according to the processor's frequency scaling in different situations. Observing this power information can be converted into timing data, allowing an attacker to steal cryptographic keys. This is done using Dynamic Voltage Frequency Scaling (DVFS), a part of any modern processor.
Intel and AMD already published that their systems are vulnerable and affected by Heartzbleed exploit. It is labeled Intel-SA-00698 ID and CVE-2022-24436 ID for Intel CPUs and CVE-2022-23823 for AMD CPUs. It affects all Intel processors, and Zen 2 and Zen 3 AMD CPUs. The attacker can exploit this vulnerability remotely without requiring physical access. Intel and AMD will not offer microcode mitigations that should prevent this type of exploit from executing successfully. Additionally, Intel stated that this attack is not very practical outside of laboratory research, as it allegedly takes hours to days to steal cryptographic keys. The performance penalty for mitigating this attack ranges from high to low, depending on the type of implementation.
View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
Intel and AMD already published that their systems are vulnerable and affected by Heartzbleed exploit. It is labeled Intel-SA-00698 ID and CVE-2022-24436 ID for Intel CPUs and CVE-2022-23823 for AMD CPUs. It affects all Intel processors, and Zen 2 and Zen 3 AMD CPUs. The attacker can exploit this vulnerability remotely without requiring physical access. Intel and AMD will not offer microcode mitigations that should prevent this type of exploit from executing successfully. Additionally, Intel stated that this attack is not very practical outside of laboratory research, as it allegedly takes hours to days to steal cryptographic keys. The performance penalty for mitigating this attack ranges from high to low, depending on the type of implementation.
View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
