Intel Arc A550M & A770M 3DMark Scores Surface

[Uskompuf]

The upcoming Intel Arc A550M & A770M mobile graphics cards have recently appeared on 3DMark in Time Spy and Fire Strike Extreme. The Intel Arc Alchemist A550M features an ACM-G10 GPU with 16 Xe cores paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus while the A770M features the same GPU but with 32 Xe cores and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

The A550M was tested in 3DMark Time Spy where it scored 6017 points running on an older 1726 driver with Intel Advanced Performance Optimizations (APO) enabled. The A770M was benchmarked with 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme where it scored a respectable 13244 points in graphics running on test drivers which places it near the RTX 3070M. This score does not correlate to real-world gaming performance with figures provided directly by Intel showing the Arc A730M only being 12% faster than the RTX 3060M.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source

 

[wolf]

These things just need to come to market already and give people more options.

 

[ixi]

These things just need to come to market already and give people more options.

Yep, for now the start for intelia is not that great. And I doubt that they will increase performace by raw power...

 

[Tsukiyomi91]

Intel at the very least should just release these GPUs to disrupt AMD and Nvidia sufficiently till the point both feel the pinch.

 

[Crackong]

We knew that A380 has 20-30% more 3D mark score than a 1650 but performs 20-30% slower in real life.
This 770m has 13244 graphics score , so I would expect it to be 20-30% slower than a 3060/3070 laptop with normal TDP settings

 

[SOAREVERSOR]

We knew that A380 has 20-30% more 3D mark score than a 1650 but performs 20-30% slower in real life.
This 770m has 13244 graphics score , so I would expect it to be 20-30% slower than a 3060/3070 laptop with normal TDP settings

How much of that is just drivers though has yet to be seen.

 

[DeathtoGnomes]

Looks like 3DMark needs to fix its software to recognize how much memory there is on the cards.

 

[R0H1T]

How much of that is just drivers though has yet to be seen.

Or it could just be that they're bad?

 

[aQi]

These things just need to come to market already and give people more options.

Nope, no cant dooo....

Especially when nvidia amd are holding back due to mined flooded cards. No one is releasing sit now....

 

[SOAREVERSOR]

Or it could just be that they're bad?

It would be the first time a GPU hit that wasn't all that good and then worked out over time.

 

[NesteaZen]

raja promiselord finally sweating hard in his cubicle?
Imagine missing the best release window in history of GPUs and missing it because of a con artist and chaos maker.

 

[Jism]

raja promiselord finally sweating hard in his cubicle?
Imagine missing the best release window in history of GPUs and missing it because of a con artist and chaos maker.

He's just doing the same he did with Vega, Polaris or Fuji. Create a computational based card, and derive faulty chips or chips that did'nt meet quality guidelines gamer chips.

This whole 3D Mark thing is pure garbage. They used a cheat to create 15% higher scores. Now the option is available to turn it off from drivers. But what they dont mention is that these cards of Intel need 50% more power in order to compete with even the 6400x.

Really great and well planned marketing that the card can beat a 3070 in 3dmark. But wait untill these reviews start showing up. Power consumption will be a thing and in actual game benchmarks will be like -25%

It's a failed generation; they know it. They just slowing down things, trying to buy some time for a newly released generation. The first one did'nt meet expectations at all.

Raja might be a good designer; but he's obviously not made for gamer market. Polaris was OK; but clocked far beyond it's efficiency. Simular with Vega. They just came with a huge tradeoff.

 

[NesteaZen]

@Jism yea well

gamers nexus reviewed the intel arc a380 today.
tl;dr without ReBar a no-go. good luck to all the buyers. Honestly, I might've even been or even still am a potential buyer, but let's see when it will be actually released and how the overall landscape will look like.
Also kind of surprising how bad the rtx 2060 is doing in 1% lows in Rainbow siege.

28:00 gamers nexus:
It's just that consistency is the key where if it's not consistent,
that is one of the most frustrating experiences for an end user.
So who should buy it?
Right now, as an enthusiast, someone who likes being on the cutting
edge, wants to play around with something new and different and interesting,
and has the patience to deal with some frustrations.
Because you've worked on computers enough to know how to deal with it
strictly from a value perspective.