error_f0rce
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2006
- Messages
- 938 (0.14/day)
- Location
- Wisconsin, USA
| Processor | Intel Core i7-930 (D0) @ 4.0GHz (1.28v) |
|---|---|
| Motherboard | GIGABYTE GA-X58A-UD3R |
| Cooling | CoolIT ECO-R120 Advanced Liquid Cooling w/ x2 Scythe ULTRA-KAZE 3000rpm | Scythe Master controller |
| Memory | Mushkin Enhanced Redline - 6GB DDR3 @ 1910MHz 8-10-8-29 |
| Video Card(s) | MSI N460GTX Twin Frozr II SOC GeForce GTX 460 768MB 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Storage | RAID-0 w/ 2x OCZ Agility 2 SSD 90GB SATA II 3.5" (r4.6Gb/s w4.2Gb/s) |
| Display(s) | ASUS VW266H - 26" LCD |
| Case | COOLER MASTER Storm Scout | x2 120mm Scythe ULTRA-KAZE | 140mm Scythe Slipstream KAZE Maru2 |
| Power Supply | Thermaltake Black Widow TR2 RX - 850w |
Gotta get my 2 cents in here. I agree that the phone is the property of the customer. That being said, Apple has a right to protect its investment and if that means developing firmware that disables phones that have been intentionally tampered with, I don't see that as anything but a shrewd business decision. If the people were clever enough (or dumb enough) to hack the phone in the first place, I'm sure they'll find a way to roll back the firmware too. In the end it's up to the hacker if they're going to update the software or not. They started playing hardball when they cracked the phone, but get all whiny when Apple plays back at them. IMO they totally had it coming... you mess with the bull, you get the horns.
