Ummmm, if you don't have ReBAR it's worth about £60/$70/€65 because there's no shortage of working, equivalent-performance cards for that kind of money, Oh - and their driver features
work and the performance in older games (not tested by TPU) are vastly superior. The 1050 Ti is also only a 75W card.
If you do have ReBAR then your motherboard and CPU are new, then the GTX 1650 competes for $10 more, which is barely half the cost. Not all GTX 1650 cards are under 75W, but the factory-OC models typically only use 90W under furmark, so it's close enough that its not going to matter.
Those aren't unrealistic search results, those are "middle of the field"
sold listings and I filtered out faulty cards. You can ABSOLUTELY find
better deals than those - You can't mine ETH on either of them so they've never been mined on, and more than half of them allow returns, either because they're refurbs from a large-scale recycler, or because the private individual selling them reckons that if they've lasted 3-5 years already, they will probably last another 30-90 days (which is typically how long the seller return windows are).
You can argue that the RX 6400 and GT 1630 are "new" cards with a full warranty that cost more, but both of those cards are absolutely terrible scalper-level disasters that have been
abysmally reviewed and universally panned by the majority of reviewers at their MSRPs. The GPU availability crisis
is over and neither the 6400 nor the GT 1630 make any sense as purchases any more. If your budget is tight, you can do
a lot better than either of them, so the $139 for an A380 with all of its caveats isn't any better than the terrible RX 6400 or GT 1630.
