• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Expects to Lose More Market Share, to Reconsider Exiting Other Businesses

Joined
Mar 18, 2015
Messages
181 (0.05/day)
what a inept and continue gain indecent salary


:)
Intel's current position isn't Gelsinger's fault. It'll take years for his changes in strategy to have any effect, just as it took Lisa Su years to turn AMD around. Brian Krzanich is the one that allowed the rot to set in at Intel. Of course, he was also paid an extortionate amount whilst doing so, including a $50m golden handshake when he stepped down.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,666 (6.05/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
System Name Tiny the White Yeti
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling CPU: Thermalright Peerless Assassin / Case: Phanteks T30-120 x3
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
VR HMD HD 420 - Green Edition ;)
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
Pat said last year that Intel is back as leader, AMD had a good run but it is over, a year later AMD has too much momentum to be reached?
I'm guessing the new Intel CPUs won't beat Ryzen 7000 series.
big.LITTLE is basically good for two generations of 'stretching Core further to keep up'.

Dramatic TDP bumps still required, core count only increases on E cores, they're already pushed way beyond efficient curve... All I see here is a continuation of what Intel was doing since Sandy Bridge. It won't last and Pat knows it. And honestly, I don't think they're building better CPUs at all. They're different, more bursty, harder to cool, and effectively pushing laptop power technology to desktops because that's all they really have to make baby steps.

What I do know is that 3570k took no more than total package power (TDP on spec sheet) of 77W to OC it to 4.4 all core on 4 'p' cores.
Then I got an 8700K that would eat 120W to push 6 cores to 4.7 and had no OC headroom to speak of.
Now we're looking at triple that 3570k's power budget for 8 cores at 5.0~5.4 Ghz. That's 10+ years worth of Intel Core development for you... How much longer will Intel push the monolithic button before they admit defeat? And how silly are we as users for chasing those higher power bills?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
It's kinda shocking a company as successful as intel has been over the last decade seems to be on the ropes.
I'd argue it's the exact opposite, they did virtually nothing last decade! In the 2k's post Conroe they had a good run till Sandy Bridge & then they thought milking users forever on 4 cores & changing their stupid motherboards each year was a winning strategy, so unless you're looking purely on the financials front they failed hard for almost a decade!
Intel’s major problem is execution.
Their biggest problem was greed ~ they were too greedy for way too long!
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
1,760 (1.02/day)
Intel’s major problem is execution. Sapphire rapids may be an interesting product from an engineering standpoint, but it is extremely late. It’s launch is anything but rapid.

Late delivery erodes customer trust. And even if intel technically does deliver a superior product, customers who switched to Epyc won’t instantaneously switch back. Gelsinger shouldn’t be so quick to assume this. For intel to start to gain market share again, it must deliver superior products on time and in volume. Genoa is looking mighty massive… when will intel catch up ?
I agree. The delays in their key products hurt them more than competition. Now that AMD and ARM have become viable alternatives, it just adds to Intel’s pain. In my opinion, if they continue this path of failing to deliver timely, it’s possible that they may never recover, unless competition trips badly as them.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
Recover how, like 90~95% of server market or similar numbers for desktop & possibly even higher for laptops at their peak? That'll never happen so Intel should plan their future accordingly!
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,666 (6.05/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
System Name Tiny the White Yeti
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling CPU: Thermalright Peerless Assassin / Case: Phanteks T30-120 x3
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
VR HMD HD 420 - Green Edition ;)
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
I would also disagree with a previous poster who said that their GPU efforts are "rubbish". No. It actually makes sense because computing has long evolved beyond the pure CPU space. AMD and nVidia make a lot of money with GPUs outside of gaming. The datacenter revenue of nVidia last quarter surpassed gaming and was up +61% so massive growth in that sector. And mirroring Intel's GPU efforts, nVidia is working on a CPU (nVidia Grace) to complete their eco system.
Intel should have stuck with Larrabee and fixed it. They would be in a much better position in the datacenter space right now with a strong CPU + GPU computing package. Now they have to play catch-up game again but it is certainly not "rubbish". They need a strong GPU segment in order to compete in the long run (5+ years).
The one key consideration every time in semiconductor is that you need a long breath and dedication.

Larrabee, but also the 'one off' CPU designs that improved on the GPU aspect are all brainfarts with no dedication attached. That's the problem. And then we get ARC: a massive heap of misfires in project planning, totally bad assessment of what the market would want in a GPU and what to prioritize in its development, and just overall a completely failed launch; but not only that, it is also a GPU stack that currently holds absolutely nothing in terms of potential design wins. Its just another GPU trying to get all the metrics right, but behind on each and every one. Its not power efficient, it doesn't do certain things better, and it doesn't have shortcuts to becoming better.

If that's not 'rubbish', what is? Where is the snippet of Intel's history that should provide the confidence there is dedication this time? I'm not seeing it, other than more promises.

Its not like the competition is going to stop making faster GPUs either.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,965 (3.03/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
I'd argue it's the exact opposite, they did virtually nothing last decade! In the 2k's post Conroe they had a good run till Sandy Bridge & then they thought milking users forever on 4 cores & changing their stupid motherboards each year was a winning strategy, so unless you're looking purely on the financials front they failed hard for almost a decade!

They still made some good products

I personally enjoyed all the intel cpu I owned in that time span 2500k, 4790k, 5820k, 6700K, 9900k I did briefly own a 10700k and 11500 but those were given away after I messed around with them for a couple weeks.... My 6700k system just recently got decommissioned after 7 years of service not bad really for a quad core.

The socket thing never bothered me back then a decent mobo wasn't nearly as expensive as it is today even my X99 board was cheap by todays standards I typically swap motherboard when upgrading the cpu regardless unless I'm using a cpu as a placeholder like I did with my 5800X (that i paid 50 usd for) till the 5950X dropped to msrp....

The 8700K and some of their lower end hedt options were also pretty great and even if 10th gen and 11th gen were meh it was still a miracle they could somewhat compete at all on an obviously inferior node.

I tend to buy whatever I find interesting nearly dropped 1500 usd on an Alder Lake platform cpu/mobo/ram just for fun. Glad I grabbed an Oled to use as a secondary media monitor instead.....
 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,440 (1.42/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory 32GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz
Storage M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) Realtec 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
It makes me think, all the performance came with the silly frequency bumps which boosts power consumption too. Ecores are being added but this can't go forever. It would seem Intel is losing option what to do next. If the next two years are going to bring leadership for Intel it won't be due to monolithic die and ecores number increase. This can't go forever and I'm sure Intel knows this. I can only hope they will figure something better for the future of CPUs because I think, the ecores and ramping up the power consumption with frequency bumps is not going to cut it.
If AMD decides to go ecore as well, Intel won't stand a chance . They need something big very soon.
 
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,021 (0.63/day)
System Name Dirt Sheep | Silent Sheep
Processor i5-2400 | 13900K (-0.02mV offset)
Motherboard Asus P8H67-M LE | Gigabyte AERO Z690-G, bios F29e Intel baseline
Cooling Scythe Katana Type 1 | Noctua NH-U12A chromax.black
Memory G-skill 2*8GB DDR3 | Corsair Vengeance 4*32GB DDR5 5200Mhz C40 @4000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 970GTX Mini | NV 1080TI FE (cap at 50%, 800mV)
Storage 2*SN850 1TB, 230S 4TB, 840EVO 128GB, WD green 2TB HDD, IronWolf 6TB, 2*HC550 18TB in RAID1
Display(s) LG 21` FHD W2261VP | Lenovo 27` 4K Qreator 27
Case Thermaltake V3 Black|Define 7 Solid, stock 3*14 fans+ 2*12 front&buttom+ out 1*8 (on expansion slot)
Audio Device(s) Beyerdynamic DT 990 (or the screen speakers when I'm too lazy)
Power Supply Enermax Pro82+ 525W | Corsair RM650x (2021)
Mouse Logitech Master 3
Keyboard Roccat Isku FX
VR HMD Nop.
Software WIN 10 | WIN 11
Benchmark Scores CB23 SC: i5-2400=641 | i9-13900k=2325-2281 MC: i5-2400=i9 13900k SC | i9-13900k=37240-35500
How much longer will Intel push the monolithic button before they admit defeat? And how silly are we as users for chasing those higher power bills?
Nothing is stopping intel from making their version of chiplet and I dont see how choosing so will count as 'defet'.
This word doesn't belong to describe tech strategis..

Anyway, thay can keep the Big.little thing plus chiplet ,if thay choose so, combind with tiels that come after RL.

And what dose it say about AMD chiplet design if it can only match (give or take) and not totaly win intel Big.little?
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2021
Messages
281 (0.21/day)
I'd argue it's the exact opposite, they did virtually nothing last decade! In the 2k's post Conroe they had a good run till Sandy Bridge & then they thought milking users forever on 4 cores & changing their stupid motherboards each year was a winning strategy, so unless you're looking purely on the financials front they failed hard for almost a decade!

Their biggest problem was greed ~ they were too greedy for way too long!
Capitalism is inherently greedy… the capitalist’s greed entices him or her to produce goods and services in exchange for $$$.
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
3,605 (2.49/day)
Location
Slovenia
Processor i5-6600K
Motherboard Asus Z170A
Cooling some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar
Memory 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
Display(s) 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200
Case Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh
Audio Device(s) E-mu 1212m PCI
Power Supply Seasonic G-360
Mouse Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse
Keyboard Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994
Software Oldwin
This is also a signal to the other members of the cartel, who find it easy to decrypt: go ahead, up your prices now. (and don't worry, we'll follow when we can)
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
Capitalism is inherently greedy… the capitalist’s greed entices him or her to produce goods and services in exchange for $$$.
Yes but it doesn't really stop them from innovating, do you remember one major innovation from Intel this last decade? Ok, I'll probably concede AVX & its various 'flavors' ~ what else?
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
1,227 (0.50/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
Memory 32Gb G-Skill Trident Z Neo @3806MHz C14
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX2070
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 1TB
Display(s) Samsung G9 49" Curved Ultrawide
Case Cooler Master Cosmos
Audio Device(s) O2 USB Headphone AMP
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Cherry MX
Software Windows 11
Did Intel run out of glue? I'm sure if they just keep adding e cores, they will keep up with AMD midrange products...

But in all seriousness, this is a sad day for the CPU market. I'm not a fan of Intel, but I'm also not going to enjoy AMD only competing with themselves, we have all seen how that will end!
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
3,605 (2.49/day)
Location
Slovenia
Processor i5-6600K
Motherboard Asus Z170A
Cooling some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar
Memory 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
Display(s) 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200
Case Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh
Audio Device(s) E-mu 1212m PCI
Power Supply Seasonic G-360
Mouse Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse
Keyboard Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994
Software Oldwin
And what dose it say about AMD chiplet design if it can only match (give or take) and not totaly win intel Big.little?
It tells us that all manufacturers have come close to the limits imposed by physics, and even closer to the limits imposed by the combination of physics and economics.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
1,948 (0.66/day)
It tells us that all manufacturers have come close to the limits imposed by physics, and even closer to the limits imposed by the combination of physics and economics.
This is the best post so far. Semiconductors pushing electrons through copper wires and transistor gaps is at the end of its technological life.

Studies for my job in the laser industry has shown a huge increase in nanophotonics research. Its time for the age of the photon!
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
Good luck with that & no as AMD, Nvidia, Apple have shown there's at least a decade left before we bid adieu to Si ~ Intel just needs to work harder! It's funny how people so easily forget Intel was leading AMD on the node front for more than a decade, since Conroe to zen3(2?) IIRC, sure they had superior uarch but clearly the physics played a big part in their success.
 
Joined
Sep 28, 2012
Messages
982 (0.22/day)
System Name Poor Man's PC
Processor Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Motherboard MSI B650M Mortar WiFi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 with Arctic P12 Max fan
Memory 32GB GSkill Flare X5 DDR5 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) XFX Merc 310 Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB + 8 TB WD Ultrastar DC HC320
Display(s) Xiaomi G Pro 27i MiniLED
Case Asus A21 Case
Audio Device(s) MPow Air Wireless + Mi Soundbar
Power Supply Enermax Revolution DF 650W Gold
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 3
Keyboard Logitech Pro X + Kailh box heavy pale blue switch + Durock stabilizers
VR HMD Meta Quest 2
Benchmark Scores Who need bench when everything already fast?
Where all of those triple budget and twice as many employee AMD has?
 
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
5,432 (0.85/day)
Location
Tennessee
System Name AM5
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7950X
Motherboard Asrock X670E Taichi
Cooling EK AIO Basic 360
Memory Corsair Vengeance DDR5 5600 64 Gb - XMP1 Profile
Video Card(s) AMD Reference 7900 XTX 24 Gb
Storage Crucial Gen 5 1 TB, Samsung Gen 4 980 1 TB / Samsung 8TB SSD
Display(s) Samsung 34" 240hz 4K
Case Fractal Define R7
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME PX-1300, 1300W 80+ Platinum, Full Modular
Intel should exit Arc business. Shareholders are frustrated over Arc, and believe it will lose a tremendous amount of money before becoming profitable.

The United States of America needs Intel to be successful. Tables have turned, and they need to focus on core businesses: Server, Laptop, ARM, and desktop.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
9,340 (5.29/day)
Location
Louisiana
System Name Ghetto Rigs z490|x99|Acer 17 Nitro 7840hs/ 5600c40-2x16/ 4060/ 1tb acer stock m.2/ 4tb sn850x
Processor 10900k w/Optimus Foundation | 5930k w/Black Noctua D15
Motherboard z490 Maximus XII Apex | x99 Sabertooth
Cooling oCool D5 res-combo/280 GTX/ Optimus Foundation/ gpu water block | Blk D15
Memory Trident-Z Royal 4000c16 2x16gb | Trident-Z 3200c14 4x8gb
Video Card(s) Titan Xp-water | evga 980ti gaming-w/ air
Storage 970evo+500gb & sn850x 4tb | 860 pro 256gb | Acer m.2 1tb/ sn850x 4tb| Many2.5" sata's ssd 3.5hdd's
Display(s) 1-AOC G2460PG 24"G-Sync 144Hz/ 2nd 1-ASUS VG248QE 24"/ 3rd LG 43" series
Case D450 | Cherry Entertainment center on Test bench
Audio Device(s) Built in Realtek x2 with 2-Insignia 2.0 sound bars & 1-LG sound bar
Power Supply EVGA 1000P2 with APC AX1500 | 850P2 with CyberPower-GX1325U
Mouse Redragon 901 Perdition x3
Keyboard G710+x3
Software Win-7 pro x3 and win-10 & 11pro x3
Benchmark Scores Are in the benchmark section
Hi,
To many lakes is why.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,666 (6.05/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
System Name Tiny the White Yeti
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling CPU: Thermalright Peerless Assassin / Case: Phanteks T30-120 x3
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
VR HMD HD 420 - Green Edition ;)
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
Nothing is stopping intel from making their version of chiplet and I dont see how choosing so will count as 'defet'.
This word doesn't belong to describe tech strategis..

Anyway, thay can keep the Big.little thing plus chiplet ,if thay choose so, combind with tiels that come after RL.

And what dose it say about AMD chiplet design if it can only match (give or take) and not totaly win intel Big.little?
What all of it says is that you need indeed the combination of chiplet and big little to even make a dent in CPU performance cap at any kind of decent TDP.

The low hanging fruit is gone, or, one could say, you need all of it in a basket to make something that truly excels. The progress on CPU now is stretching up the ceiling ever further to make a longer bar of bench points.

Defeat however it shall be. Intel stuck with its old strategy for far too long and they've been forced to adapt several times already. That's defeat - they had a strategic outlook and it completely misfired. The same thing happened with Optane. It happened with first gen Arc and Xe. And it happened by sitting on quad core for far too long, and then by sitting on 10nm for far too long. Had enough? Hang on! They also missed the ARM train and still are - the biggest problem going forward for them.

I know tech companies don't like to call this defeat, because they're always winning in their board rooms, but really, some well paid big ego's made some pretty gruesome and long lasting mistakes here. The fact that an underdog can come out swinging like AMD did is a testament to that.

I certainly hope Pat's got some pretty big aces up his sleeve for 2025.


If we want a live example of a tech company that seems to have learned the lesson in tech 'you can't ever stop moving ahead of the pack', you need to be looking at Nvidia. Whatever we think of their methods, the fact is, every year they have something that raises eyebrows. Every time they seem to push and stretch things a bit further, and that's not just regarding their architectural improvements. They're on the ball in every aspect of their product portfolio: software most importantly. They know they're not selling a GPU, they're selling a thing people do with it, and they're actively contributing to those worlds.

Intel historically has done very little of that, and wherever they DID show such dedication, they gained and kept market share. For CPU that would be things like AVX, but also the close relationship with their supply chain and making sure product gets Intel inside. Again, whatever you think of their methods, this kind of dedication is what makes any piece of hardware shine - their laptop dedication for example is also the reason we've got those bursty though pretty efficient consumer CPUs. A trait AMD hasn't been able to push out on Ryzen quite as well just yet.

To circle back to the opening of this post: I'm looking forward to Intel and AMD stealing each other's tech and making a real step forward. Chiplet based core complexes of different kinds? GO. It is then, and only then that software can be tailored to make best use of big little and the properties of chiplet.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
9,340 (5.29/day)
Location
Louisiana
System Name Ghetto Rigs z490|x99|Acer 17 Nitro 7840hs/ 5600c40-2x16/ 4060/ 1tb acer stock m.2/ 4tb sn850x
Processor 10900k w/Optimus Foundation | 5930k w/Black Noctua D15
Motherboard z490 Maximus XII Apex | x99 Sabertooth
Cooling oCool D5 res-combo/280 GTX/ Optimus Foundation/ gpu water block | Blk D15
Memory Trident-Z Royal 4000c16 2x16gb | Trident-Z 3200c14 4x8gb
Video Card(s) Titan Xp-water | evga 980ti gaming-w/ air
Storage 970evo+500gb & sn850x 4tb | 860 pro 256gb | Acer m.2 1tb/ sn850x 4tb| Many2.5" sata's ssd 3.5hdd's
Display(s) 1-AOC G2460PG 24"G-Sync 144Hz/ 2nd 1-ASUS VG248QE 24"/ 3rd LG 43" series
Case D450 | Cherry Entertainment center on Test bench
Audio Device(s) Built in Realtek x2 with 2-Insignia 2.0 sound bars & 1-LG sound bar
Power Supply EVGA 1000P2 with APC AX1500 | 850P2 with CyberPower-GX1325U
Mouse Redragon 901 Perdition x3
Keyboard G710+x3
Software Win-7 pro x3 and win-10 & 11pro x3
Benchmark Scores Are in the benchmark section
And what dose it say about AMD chiplet design if it can only match (give or take) and not totaly win intel Big.little?
Hi,
Not much more to say the article says exactly why nobody is impressed anymore by simply adding more voltage :cool:
Intel's CEO Pat Gelsinger announced that he expects the company to continue to lose its market share to AMD as the competition has "too much momentum" going for it. AMD's Ryzen and EPYC processors continue to deliver power and efficiency performance figures, which drives customers towards the company.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
Certainly better than those dumba**** who blew such tremendous lead over AMD in less than half a decade! Just 3 years in fact ~ they had it in them but deliberately chose to suck the life out of their long paying customers. How do you explain the 4c-10c top end MSDT on the same 14nm node then, 7700k-10900k in the time Ryzen launched :rolleyes:

And why the heck do you need 4 motherboards to go from 4c-10c on the same uarch :slap:
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Messages
1,131 (0.83/day)
Location
Bavaria ⌬ Germany
System Name ✨ Lenovo M700 [Tiny]
Cooling ⚠️ 78,08% N² ⌬ 20,95% O² ⌬ 0,93% Ar ⌬ 0,04% CO²
Audio Device(s) ◐◑ AKG K702 ⌬ FiiO E10K Olympus 2
Mouse ✌️ Corsair M65 RGB Elite [Black] ⌬ Endgame Gear MPC-890 Cordura
Keyboard ⌨ Turtle Beach Impact 500
"Intel's CEO Pat Gelsinger announced that he expects the company to continue to lose its market share to AMD as the competition has "too much momentum" going for it. AMD's Ryzen and EPYC processors continue to deliver power and efficiency performance figures, which drives customers towards the company."

Dam, that's like admitting defeat! Not even blaming the Covid pandemic issues, Russian war or inflation/recession for it. o_O He must be coma drinking after the AMD Zen4 Reveal Event, lol.

Well, we saw the impacts comming closer & closer. 3D V-Cache, continuing process node enhancements & better power/performance. And the Zen4 3Dc V-Cache models aren't even out yet.
Absolutely sounds Intel has to watch from the sidelines how Zen4 will dominate the gaming desktop market.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top