- Joined
- May 2, 2017
- Messages
- 7,762 (2.78/day)
- Location
- Back in Norway
System Name | Hotbox |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 110/95/110, PBO +150Mhz, CO -7,-7,-20(x6), |
Motherboard | ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax |
Cooling | LOBO + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14 |
Memory | 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14 @3800c15 |
Video Card(s) | PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UC@2250MHz max @~200W |
Storage | 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro |
Display(s) | Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary |
Case | SSUPD Meshlicious |
Audio Device(s) | Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3 |
Power Supply | Corsair SF750 Platinum |
Mouse | Logitech G603 |
Keyboard | Keychron K3/Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps |
Software | Windows 10 Pro |
No. Both have the same MSRP. Street prices are another matter entirely. Nvidia never gave any other price for the 3090 Ti than 1499.Technically the 4090 is 400 cheaper than the launch 3090ti given that it's 2-4x faster depending on what you're doing with it thay isn't bad
Edit2: Apparently I can neither read nor remember things, as apparently the Ti did launch at $1999 and this was $1599, not 1499. Thank you, brain.
... except for the fact that it's a twelve hundred dollar 80-tier GPU, and not even a Ti. How is that for insanity?The 1200 usd 4080 16GB being twice as fast as a 3080ti likely at lower wattage sounds ok as well
I would tend to agree except for the fact that they're not actually getting meaningfully cheaper. Rather, it seems like they want to sell Ampere, but they also really don't want to sell them at anything resembling affordable prices - they'd rather launch a more expensive alternative to point to so they can say "hey, at least you're not paying $1500, right?"These prices seem more about selling ampere than them wanting to sell 3080s.
Last edited: