• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

GIGABYTE Brings Raptor Lake "Instant 6 GHz" Auto-OC Feature to its Intel Z690 Motherboards

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,306 (7.52/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
GIGABYTE TECHNOLOGY Co. Ltd, a leading manufacturer of motherboards, graphics cards, and hardware solutions, today announced to extend the instant 6 GHz technology designed for Intel Core i9-13900K and Core i7-13700K processors to the Z690 platform. By simply upgrading the latest BIOS of Z690 motherboards and activating the relevant settings, users can optimize their Intel Core i9-13900K and Core i7-13700K processors to 6 GHz for the performance boost on single-core up to 3%. This enables users who stay with the existing Z690 platform can enjoy the performance enhancement of the new CPU as well.

The latest Intel 13th gen processor has impressed users with its class-leading performance. GIGABYTE's Instant 6 GHz on the Z790 platform was renowned for unleashing the performance of Intel Core i9-13900K and Core i7-13700K processors for users in an easier way and is now employed on the Z690 platform. By simply upgrading the latest BIOS with Instant 6 GHz activated, the system can automatically tweak CPU voltage and Vcore Load Line Calibration of Intel Core i9-13900K and Core i7-13700K processors to detect the most two optimized cores running at 6 GHz frequency. This further delivers a 3% performance boost on one single core like the Z790 platform.



GIGABYTE motherboards are notable for their exclusive VRM design, thermal design, and fine-tuning for convenience. To provide a superior user experience and maximum benefits to users, GIGABYTE brings Instant 6 GHz technology to the Z690 platform for those who use Intel 13th gen processor without upgrading to Z790 motherboards can also get a performance boost with ease.

The BIOS support Instant 6 GHz technology of Z690 motherboards has been updated on the GIGABYTE official website, users can upgrade BIOS with Q-Flash or Q-Flash Plus to enjoy the innovative technology from GIGABYTE.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,769 (1.40/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
3% performance boost for 50% increase in Power consumption??
Lol.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2021
Messages
1,183 (0.97/day)
Where are you getting 50% from?
Measured by Gordon from PC World. Anything above 253W (PL1/PL1), in unrestricted power usage mode, brings negligible performance uplift with exponential power use towards 350W. So, adding another 30-40W to feed the beast at 6GHz, you get ~50% more power usage above PL2 for another 1000 points in CR23, which is ~3%. Not worth it by any stretch of imagination and reason. "6GHz" is a marketing gimmick to tell you that you need to buy 420 mm AIO, as CPU will throttle even faster, and get ready to pay more bills for heating during winter season.

Essentially, 6GHz mode is a winter heating solution for your room.
Performance Core i9 7950X C23.png
 
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,022 (0.63/day)
System Name Dirt Sheep | Silent Sheep
Processor i5-2400 | 13900K (-0.02mV offset)
Motherboard Asus P8H67-M LE | Gigabyte AERO Z690-G, bios F29e Intel baseline
Cooling Scythe Katana Type 1 | Noctua NH-U12A chromax.black
Memory G-skill 2*8GB DDR3 | Corsair Vengeance 4*32GB DDR5 5200Mhz C40 @4000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 970GTX Mini | NV 1080TI FE (cap at 50%, 800mV)
Storage 2*SN850 1TB, 230S 4TB, 840EVO 128GB, WD green 2TB HDD, IronWolf 6TB, 2*HC550 18TB in RAID1
Display(s) LG 21` FHD W2261VP | Lenovo 27` 4K Qreator 27
Case Thermaltake V3 Black|Define 7 Solid, stock 3*14 fans+ 2*12 front&buttom+ out 1*8 (on expansion slot)
Audio Device(s) Beyerdynamic DT 990 (or the screen speakers when I'm too lazy)
Power Supply Enermax Pro82+ 525W | Corsair RM650x (2021)
Mouse Logitech Master 3
Keyboard Roccat Isku FX
VR HMD Nop.
Software WIN 10 | WIN 11
Benchmark Scores CB23 SC: i5-2400=641 | i9-13900k=2325-2281 MC: i5-2400=i9 13900k SC | i9-13900k=37240-35500
A very nice bonus to Gigabyte Z690 owners (me included), as I just recently apply the F21 bios with that feature (it is out as of 15.11).
Another example why Z790 not worth the extra $ compere to Z690.
3% performance boost for 50% increase in Power consumption??
Lol.
Measured by Gordon from PC World. Anything above 253W (PL1/PL1), in unrestricted power usage mode, brings negligible performance uplift with exponential power use towards 350W. So, adding another 30-40W to feed the beast at 6GHz, you get ~50% more power usage above PL2 for another 1000 points in CR23, which is ~3%. Not worth it by any stretch of imagination and reason. "6GHz" is a marketing gimmick to tell you that you need to buy 420 mm AIO, as CPU will throttle even faster, and get ready to pay more bills for heating during winter season.

Essentially, 6GHz mode is a winter heating solution for your room.
6 GHz is only for 1-2 best P cores. Not all cores.
Many photo\video apps can do very good with that extra, free, Hz that no way max the 253w budget.
Also gaming, that hardly (if ever) reach that 253w mark.
No CPU goes 350+w for only 2 cores (unless under LN maybe), surely not 13900K/13700K.
From payling with it a little, my CPU reach that 6GHz on 1 cores at under 100w in CB23 single, using air cooler.
You don't do multi to test that feature..
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Messages
455 (0.07/day)
System Name -
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI MEG X570
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 (4x140 push-pull)
Memory 32GB Patriot Steel DDR4 3733 (8GBx4)
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4080 X-trio.
Storage Sabrent Rocket-Plus-G 2TB, Crucial P1 1TB, WD 1TB sata.
Display(s) LG Ultragear 34G750 nano-IPS 34" utrawide
Case Define R6
Audio Device(s) Xfi PCIe
Power Supply Fractal Design ION Gold 750W
Mouse Razer DeathAdder V2 Mini.
Keyboard Logitech K120
VR HMD Er no, pointless.
Software Windows 10 22H2
Benchmark Scores Timespy - 24522 | Crystalmark - 7100/6900 Seq. & 84/266 QD1 |
Where are you getting 50% from?
Its a well know fact that both Intel 13th gen and Amd 7th gen both use increasing amount of power with increased clocks, a simple search will verify this.

That and as it stands the 13900 series runs so bloody hot & power hungry that there isnt a consumer grade cooling solution(this includes custom open loops fyi that will effectivly cool the chip. ALL reviews have shown that this chip hits its TJmax in a very short space of time and thermal throttles. Some users have have some successes with undervolting in an attempt to keep the thermals under control.

So when I see chips like this binned 6ghz units, ALL I see is just like any 13900 k or KF, is increased electricity bills for very little gain. hard NO. You are much better of getting a 13600 (best for buck of this series) or if you want same core count for less power consumtion the 13700, simples.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,022 (0.63/day)
System Name Dirt Sheep | Silent Sheep
Processor i5-2400 | 13900K (-0.02mV offset)
Motherboard Asus P8H67-M LE | Gigabyte AERO Z690-G, bios F29e Intel baseline
Cooling Scythe Katana Type 1 | Noctua NH-U12A chromax.black
Memory G-skill 2*8GB DDR3 | Corsair Vengeance 4*32GB DDR5 5200Mhz C40 @4000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 970GTX Mini | NV 1080TI FE (cap at 50%, 800mV)
Storage 2*SN850 1TB, 230S 4TB, 840EVO 128GB, WD green 2TB HDD, IronWolf 6TB, 2*HC550 18TB in RAID1
Display(s) LG 21` FHD W2261VP | Lenovo 27` 4K Qreator 27
Case Thermaltake V3 Black|Define 7 Solid, stock 3*14 fans+ 2*12 front&buttom+ out 1*8 (on expansion slot)
Audio Device(s) Beyerdynamic DT 990 (or the screen speakers when I'm too lazy)
Power Supply Enermax Pro82+ 525W | Corsair RM650x (2021)
Mouse Logitech Master 3
Keyboard Roccat Isku FX
VR HMD Nop.
Software WIN 10 | WIN 11
Benchmark Scores CB23 SC: i5-2400=641 | i9-13900k=2325-2281 MC: i5-2400=i9 13900k SC | i9-13900k=37240-35500
Its a well know fact that both ibntel 13th gen and Amd 7th gen both use increasing amount of power the higher you go clock wise. a simple search will verify this.
Correct. But in no search you will find plus 120w (+50%) on top of 253w to get from 5.8/5.4Ghz to 6GHz on 2 cores. All cores 6GHz (13900KS style) maybe, but this is somewhat off topic (just as some other comments here).
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2020
Messages
382 (0.26/day)
System Name Incomplete thing 1.0
Processor Ryzen 2600
Motherboard B450 Aorus Elite
Cooling Gelid Phantom Black
Memory HyperX Fury RGB 3200 CL16 16GB
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 2060 Gaming OC PRO
Storage Dual 1TB 970evo
Display(s) AOC G2U 1440p 144hz, HP e232
Case CM mb511 RGB
Audio Device(s) Reloop ADM-4
Power Supply Sharkoon WPM-600
Mouse G502 Hero
Keyboard Sharkoon SGK3 Blue
Software W10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 2-5% over stock scores
3% performance boost for 50% increase in Power consumption??
Lol.
Marketing baby. These kinds of features basically give Gigabyte free advertising space on tech websites, once they release a press release for it.
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
1,761 (1.02/day)
It is a good value add, but not going to make any meaningful improvement for most people. Just as mentioned in the article itself, the single core improvement is 3%, which is negligible in real world performance. Power consumption may not go up as much since it is only single core, but for single core power consumption, it will still be very high since the chip is pushed to its limits.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2021
Messages
1,183 (0.97/day)
A very nice bonus to Gigabyte Z690 owners (me included), as I just recently apply the F21 bios with that feature (it is out as of 15.11).
Another example why Z790 not worth the extra $ compere to Z690.


6 GHz is only for 1-2 best P cores. Not all cores.
Many photo\video apps can do very good with that extra, free, Hz that no way max the 253w budget.
Also gaming, that hardly (if ever) reach that 253w mark.
No CPU goes 350+w for only 2 cores (unless under LN maybe), surely not 13900K/13700K.
From paying with it a little, my CPU reach that 6GHz on 1 cores at under 100w in CB23 single, using air cooler.
You don't do multi to test that feature..
For single core apps, 6GHz short burst is fine. For heavy MT apps, it's not manageable anymore due to heavy throttling.
 

ir_cow

Staff member
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
4,578 (0.77/day)
Location
USA
Its a well know fact that both Intel 13th gen and Amd 7th gen both use increasing amount of power with increased clocks, a simple search will verify this.

That and as it stands the 13900 series runs so bloody hot & power hungry that there isnt a consumer grade cooling solution(this includes custom open loops fyi that will effectivly cool the chip. ALL reviews have shown that this chip hits its TJmax in a very short space of time and thermal throttles. Some users have have some successes with undervolting in an attempt to keep the thermals under control.

So when I see chips like this binned 6ghz units, ALL I see is just like any 13900 k or KF, is increased electricity bills for very little gain. hard NO. You are much better of getting a 13600 (best for buck of this series) or if you want same core count for less power consumtion the 13700, simples.
While I agree you won't gain anything because its only 2 cores, the whole 50% is incorrect. I'm running it right now. no 50% increase at idle or benchmarks restricted to two cores. Also that 100c is only if you allow P1=4096. Set the power limit to YOUR setup. I'm on a custom loop, but still it takes 10 minutes of R23 to get to 98c with "unlimited power".
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2010
Messages
348 (0.07/day)
While I agree you won't gain anything because its only 2 cores, the whole 50% is incorrect. I'm running it right now. no 50% increase at idle or benchmarks restricted to two cores. Also that 100c is only if you allow P1=4096. Set the power limit to YOUR setup. I'm on a custom loop, but still it takes 10 minutes of R23 to get to 98c with "unlimited power".
Clearly he didn't read very carefully to see it was only 2 cores and just regurgitated some numbers he saw that made Raptor Lake look worse than it does under general performance use cases.
 
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,022 (0.63/day)
System Name Dirt Sheep | Silent Sheep
Processor i5-2400 | 13900K (-0.02mV offset)
Motherboard Asus P8H67-M LE | Gigabyte AERO Z690-G, bios F29e Intel baseline
Cooling Scythe Katana Type 1 | Noctua NH-U12A chromax.black
Memory G-skill 2*8GB DDR3 | Corsair Vengeance 4*32GB DDR5 5200Mhz C40 @4000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 970GTX Mini | NV 1080TI FE (cap at 50%, 800mV)
Storage 2*SN850 1TB, 230S 4TB, 840EVO 128GB, WD green 2TB HDD, IronWolf 6TB, 2*HC550 18TB in RAID1
Display(s) LG 21` FHD W2261VP | Lenovo 27` 4K Qreator 27
Case Thermaltake V3 Black|Define 7 Solid, stock 3*14 fans+ 2*12 front&buttom+ out 1*8 (on expansion slot)
Audio Device(s) Beyerdynamic DT 990 (or the screen speakers when I'm too lazy)
Power Supply Enermax Pro82+ 525W | Corsair RM650x (2021)
Mouse Logitech Master 3
Keyboard Roccat Isku FX
VR HMD Nop.
Software WIN 10 | WIN 11
Benchmark Scores CB23 SC: i5-2400=641 | i9-13900k=2325-2281 MC: i5-2400=i9 13900k SC | i9-13900k=37240-35500
So when I see chips like this binned 6ghz units, ALL I see is just like any 13900 k or KF, is increased electricity bills for very little gain. hard NO. You are much better of getting a 13600 (best for buck of this series) or if you want same core count for less power consumtion the 13700, simples.
It is not binning, it`s for all 13700k/13900k CPU`s.
And you are right for gaming, less for apps. Some show 8%, 15% or even 20% with 13900 compere to 13700, some show only 1-3%. As always, It all depends on your usage.
 
Top