- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 9,249 (1.60/day)
- Location
- Montreal, Canada
System Name | Homelabs |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5900x | Ryzen 1920X |
Motherboard | Asus ProArt x570 Creator | AsRock X399 fatal1ty gaming |
Cooling | Silent Loop 2 280mm | Dark Rock Pro TR4 |
Memory | 128GB (4x32gb) DDR4 3600Mhz | 128GB (8x16GB) DDR4 2933Mhz |
Video Card(s) | EVGA RTX 3080 | ASUS Strix GTX 970 |
Storage | Optane 900p + NVMe | Optane 900p + 8TB SATA SSDs + 48TB HDDs |
Display(s) | Alienware AW3423dw QD-OLED | HP Omen 32 1440p |
Case | be quiet! Dark Base Pro 900 rev 2 | be quiet! Silent Base 800 |
Power Supply | Corsair RM750x + sleeved cables| EVGA P2 750W |
Mouse | Razer Viper Ultimate (still has buttons on the right side, crucial as I'm a southpaw) |
Keyboard | Razer Huntsman Elite, Pro Type | Logitech G915 TKL |
Uhhh.... No? Now what you could say with DLSS, at the same image quality Nvidia has much better FPS, though ofc with games that have FSR 2.X that lead is reduced. Same with Ray-tracing. I'll give AMD that they tend to age better due to improvements with drivers over time. AMD is great, but you'd think that professional reviews, members in the tech community, Tech Jesus and everyone else would criticize, or at least point out, if there is any difference in image quality.it is widely accepted that AMD has better image quality
I'm not sure why you would use "widely accepted", when if you ask 100 tech-savvy or IT or whatever group of people you want, if they think there is a difference in image quality between AMD or NVIDIA, you'll get more NVIDIA votes than AMD and 90+% no difference ones...