- Joined
- Feb 20, 2019
- Messages
- 7,894 (3.90/day)
System Name | Bragging Rights |
---|---|
Processor | Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz |
Motherboard | It has no markings but it's green |
Cooling | No, it's a 2.2W processor |
Memory | 2GB DDR3L-1333 |
Video Card(s) | Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz) |
Storage | 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3 |
Display(s) | 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz |
Case | Veddha T2 |
Audio Device(s) | Apparently, yes |
Power Supply | Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger |
Mouse | MX Anywhere 2 |
Keyboard | Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all) |
VR HMD | Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though.... |
Software | W10 21H1, barely |
Benchmark Scores | I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000. |
Why do all early GPU perfomance leaks go out of their way to avoid a game benchmark, or at least 3DMark?!
At $800 it may have had a chance against the slew of discounted 6900XT cards still clogging up shelves - but only a chance, the >$650 market doesn't have a lot of room for bargain-hunters. If you can justify one of those you can probably justify something much better just as easily.
That launched dead. It cannot die any more than it already has.If this also the case in gaming, it will be the death of the $900 7900 XT.
At $800 it may have had a chance against the slew of discounted 6900XT cards still clogging up shelves - but only a chance, the >$650 market doesn't have a lot of room for bargain-hunters. If you can justify one of those you can probably justify something much better just as easily.