- Joined
- Jun 14, 2020
- Messages
- 3,536 (2.14/day)
System Name | Mean machine |
---|---|
Processor | 12900k |
Motherboard | MSI Unify X |
Cooling | Noctua U12A |
Memory | 7600c34 |
Video Card(s) | 4090 Gamerock oc |
Storage | 980 pro 2tb |
Display(s) | Samsung crg90 |
Case | Fractal Torent |
Audio Device(s) | Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack |
Power Supply | Be quiet dark power pro 1200 |
Mouse | Viper ultimate |
Keyboard | Blackwidow 65% |
No, ofc not.If you calculate timings in nanoseconds, is that still true?
For ddr4 200mhz was equal to 1cas, so basically 4400c18 was equal to 4000c16 roundabout. Actually the 4400c18 was better cause the imc was also clocked by 200 mhz in the above example. With ddr5 since it works in gear 2 the imc impact will be lower.
Generally speaking when you are clocking ram you try to find the highest frequency you can boot at and then you start trying to tighten the timmings. The only way thats worth to drop frequency is if you are close to running 1t. Alderlake works at 1t up to 6400 mhz if you are lucky, so if your ram can do 6600 2t its better to drop down to 6400 1t