- Joined
- Dec 28, 2012
- Messages
- 3,877 (0.89/day)
System Name | Skunkworks 3.0 |
---|---|
Processor | 5800x3d |
Motherboard | x570 unify |
Cooling | Noctua NH-U12A |
Memory | 32GB 3600 mhz |
Video Card(s) | asrock 6800xt challenger D |
Storage | Sabarent rocket 4.0 2TB, MX 500 2TB |
Display(s) | Asus 1440p144 27" |
Case | Old arse cooler master 932 |
Power Supply | Corsair 1200w platinum |
Mouse | *squeak* |
Keyboard | Some old office thing |
Software | Manjaro |
There is a HUGE difference between cutting production due to low demand, and INTENTIONALLY holding back supply to raise prices. People dont seem to understand this distinction.
AMD is pissing off a lot of people. Their GPUS were overpriced unobtanium for over a year, and now that prices are decreasing they are trying to rig the market in their favor. There's a good reason they are down to 8% marketshare. If they'd been cranking out GPUs during that time they'd have made a mint, many thought they couldnt due to CPU demand but now I'm wondering if it was intentional to justify higher pricing, which they couldnt implement because they just cant catch nvidia in performance.
It's a dangerous game to play. If intel ever gets back on their feet and becomes competitive again in the server space AMD wont have a strong consumer base to fall back on anymore. Of course thats beyond next quarter, so who cares?
Because dont worry, a good chance to cut the fat will be used, regardless of profits. Corporations dont care about their employees.
AMD is pissing off a lot of people. Their GPUS were overpriced unobtanium for over a year, and now that prices are decreasing they are trying to rig the market in their favor. There's a good reason they are down to 8% marketshare. If they'd been cranking out GPUs during that time they'd have made a mint, many thought they couldnt due to CPU demand but now I'm wondering if it was intentional to justify higher pricing, which they couldnt implement because they just cant catch nvidia in performance.
It's a dangerous game to play. If intel ever gets back on their feet and becomes competitive again in the server space AMD wont have a strong consumer base to fall back on anymore. Of course thats beyond next quarter, so who cares?
Better idea: stop overhiring useless DEI departments in the first place, then you wont need to cut them (as they have received the brunt of layoffs in tech) the moment the market slows down. Then you make MORE money when in the good years too!One can argue that this practice is better than to lay off any thousands of employees like many other giant companies do this days.
Granted, it can allways come together with massive lay off...
Because dont worry, a good chance to cut the fat will be used, regardless of profits. Corporations dont care about their employees.