• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Allegedly Launches on April 13

Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
3,530 (2.14/day)
System Name Mean machine
Processor 12900k
Motherboard MSI Unify X
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 7600c34
Video Card(s) 4090 Gamerock oc
Storage 980 pro 2tb
Display(s) Samsung crg90
Case Fractal Torent
Audio Device(s) Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack
Power Supply Be quiet dark power pro 1200
Mouse Viper ultimate
Keyboard Blackwidow 65%
Seeing how 4070Ti is losing to 3080 in some cases, the 4070 will be worse than 3080 in most cases because of the gimped memory. That's called progress in jensen land.
The 7900XT is also losing to 3080 in some cases, even though the XT launched at a price 15% higher than the 4070ti. But I guess thats called progress in lisa land

That must be a very specific use case, because no way that's on average with uncapped framerates.

I play with Vsync so I prefer a fixed clock with a manual undervolt. On my 3080, most games do 200-250 W depending on GPU utilization. I saw as much as 280 W in Metro Exodus EE with max usage.
But in Aliens: Fireteam Elite I saw over 300 W in some scenes. And that was on 1800 MHz @ 0.8 V, which is a crazy undervolt compared to the stock 1.05 V. With a power limit at stock voltage, performance would drop like crazy.

A fixed clock is so much better for a capped framerate. 1800 MHz @ 0.8 V and 1905 MHz @ 0.9 V was a difference of ~200 vs. ~250 W, even though the framerate was identical.

Of course all this is with the "prefer max performance" mode. Adaptive can save you more power, but it's horrible for frametimes.


If the 4070 is $600, I might consider side-grading my 3080. This was my first card with such ridiculous power consumption, and without the undervolt I would've gotten rid of it a long time ago.
It's not impossible. I have my 4090 capped at 320w and it has similar performance to running stock
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
777 (0.18/day)
Location
Poland
System Name THU
Processor Intel Core i5-13600KF
Motherboard ASUS PRIME Z790-P D4
Cooling SilentiumPC Fortis 3 v2 + Arctic Cooling MX-2
Memory Crucial Ballistix 2x16 GB DDR4-3600 CL16 (dual rank)
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ventus 3X OC 12 GB GDDR6X (2610/21000 @ 0.91 V)
Storage Lexar NM790 2 TB + Corsair MP510 960 GB + PNY XLR8 CS3030 500 GB + Toshiba E300 3 TB
Display(s) LG OLED C8 55" + ASUS VP229Q
Case Fractal Design Define R6
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V381 + Monitor Audio Bronze 6 + Bronze FX | FiiO E10K-TC + Sony MDR-7506
Power Supply Corsair RM650
Mouse Logitech M705 Marathon
Keyboard Corsair K55 RGB PRO
Software Windows 10 Home
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks in 2024?
It's not impossible. I have my 4090 capped at 320w and it has similar performance to running stock

That's not 55%. And the 4090 is a top end card that is underutilized in most situations. Find a game that can max out the power draw at stock settings and you will lose more than 5% with a 320 W limit.

 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
4,901 (0.81/day)
Location
Multidimensional
System Name Boomer Master Race
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 8745H
Motherboard MinisForum 870 Slim Board
Cooling Mini PC Cooling
Memory Crucial 32GB 5600Mhz
Video Card(s) Radeon 780M
Storage Kingston 1TB SSD
Display(s) Sony 4K Bravia X85J 43Inch TV 120Hz
Case MinisForum 870 Slim Case
Audio Device(s) Built In Realtek Digital Audio HD
Power Supply 120w External Power Brick
Mouse Logitech G203 Lightsync
Keyboard Atrix RGB Slim Keyboard
VR HMD ( ◔ ʖ̯ ◔ )
Software Windows 11 Pro 64bit
Benchmark Scores Don't do them anymore.
Seeing how 4070Ti is losing to 3080 in some cases, the 4070 will be worse than 3080 in most cases because of the gimped memory. That's called progress in jensen land.
I assume you made a typo with that "3080" & meant a 3080 Ti? Even so the 4070 Ti easily surpasses the 3080 Ti & is in neck with the 3090 Ti despite the VRAM & gimped memory bandwidth & memory bus.

The 7900XT is also losing to 3080 in some cases, even though the XT launched at a price 15% higher than the 4070ti. But I guess thats called progress in lisa land

WTF are you & Pumper smoking? Delusional puff puff? :kookoo:
 
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
3,530 (2.14/day)
System Name Mean machine
Processor 12900k
Motherboard MSI Unify X
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 7600c34
Video Card(s) 4090 Gamerock oc
Storage 980 pro 2tb
Display(s) Samsung crg90
Case Fractal Torent
Audio Device(s) Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack
Power Supply Be quiet dark power pro 1200
Mouse Viper ultimate
Keyboard Blackwidow 65%
Find a game that can max out the power draw at stock settings and you will lose more than 5% with a 320 W limit.
I did. Im not even losing 5%
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
777 (0.18/day)
Location
Poland
System Name THU
Processor Intel Core i5-13600KF
Motherboard ASUS PRIME Z790-P D4
Cooling SilentiumPC Fortis 3 v2 + Arctic Cooling MX-2
Memory Crucial Ballistix 2x16 GB DDR4-3600 CL16 (dual rank)
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ventus 3X OC 12 GB GDDR6X (2610/21000 @ 0.91 V)
Storage Lexar NM790 2 TB + Corsair MP510 960 GB + PNY XLR8 CS3030 500 GB + Toshiba E300 3 TB
Display(s) LG OLED C8 55" + ASUS VP229Q
Case Fractal Design Define R6
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V381 + Monitor Audio Bronze 6 + Bronze FX | FiiO E10K-TC + Sony MDR-7506
Power Supply Corsair RM650
Mouse Logitech M705 Marathon
Keyboard Corsair K55 RGB PRO
Software Windows 10 Home
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks in 2024?
I did. Im not even losing 5%

Can you post some data in a 4090 thread? I'm curious what the clocks and voltages are in those scenarios. Unless there's a huge difference in voltage, but very small in the clock speed, it doesn't make sense.
 
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
3,530 (2.14/day)
System Name Mean machine
Processor 12900k
Motherboard MSI Unify X
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 7600c34
Video Card(s) 4090 Gamerock oc
Storage 980 pro 2tb
Display(s) Samsung crg90
Case Fractal Torent
Audio Device(s) Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack
Power Supply Be quiet dark power pro 1200
Mouse Viper ultimate
Keyboard Blackwidow 65%
Can you post some data in a 4090 thread? I'm curious what the clocks and voltages are in those scenarios. Unless there's a huge difference in voltage, but very small in the clock speed, it doesn't make sense.
Where is the 4090 thread? :p
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
2,012 (0.44/day)
Location
Netherlands
System Name TheDeeGee's PC
Processor Intel Core i7-11700
Motherboard ASRock Z590 Steel Legend
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix 3200/C16 32GB
Video Card(s) Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti 12GB
Storage Crucial P5 Plus 2TB / Crucial P3 Plus 2TB / Crucial P3 Plus 4TB
Display(s) EIZO CX240
Case Lian-Li O11 Dynamic Evo XL / Noctua NF-A12x25 fans
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster ZXR / AKG K601 Headphones
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME Fanless TX-700
Mouse Logitech G500S
Keyboard Keychron Q6
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
Benchmark Scores None, as long as my games runs smooth.
Could you run Superposition 1080p Extreme, and post a screenshot of the result with points and FPS' visible...? I have never been too interested of using the PL slider, but to adjust the voltage directly, which tames down the wattage.

On the other hand, this kind of 160W scenario you mentioned, makes it interesting for laptops. With a TGP of 140W and above, and such amount of cuda cores as 3072 in "4060M", I see a possibility of pumping the GPU to 3000MHz without trouble.

Having 140W TGP equals with logic of more cudas=less frequency. Less cudas=more frequency, to cap with the 140W limitation. :rolleyes:
I'll run that benchmark later today, here are some earlier findings in Fortnite with and without Ray Tracing.

With RT

Without RT
 

GFreeman

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Mar 6, 2023
Messages
1,582 (2.42/day)
The article says that 4070 will have a 192bit data bus, GDDR6 and 12GB RAM. So other than making a mistake in the type of VRAM, GDDR6X vs GDDR6, where am I wrong?
So, probably 384GB/sec bandwidth for the non Ti vs 504GB/sec for the Ti?
OK, $600-$650 then to compensate for the cheaper memory? No. Nope. Still $650-$700.
Nvidia is moving everything up now that it can.
Was a simple typo. fixed now to GDDR6X. Thanks
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,332 (3.91/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
The 4070 will be priced too high for mainstream, and that's a guarantee. It sure as hell won't launch at the $499 (or the $549 inflation-adjusted equivalent) of the 3070. The GDDR6X will also be power hungry in a market segment that wants sub-250W cards.

The 4060 will be crippled by 8GB VRAM. The 3070 already is in several of today games and that number is getting bigger rapidly.

Thanks, Nvidia, but you've already f*cked up and you haven't even launched the products yet.
I'm really hoping AMD doesn't drop the ball with the midrange parts this generation. Nvidia, left unchecked, are a plague upon PC gaming. I cannot tell you how many people I've said "buy a console" to in the last 3 years because of dumb pricing - when previously there were good options you could put in a reasonable sub-$1000 build.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2023
Messages
66 (0.10/day)
I am hoping to see <700 price on 4070.

Beyond that, 4070ti at 900 is the choice.


Expecting 4070 to score around 7750pts in Timespy Extreme (graphics score), lets see how much am I mistaken. ;D Just my guess based solely on the rumoured amount of 5888 cudas. But it would be quite far off from 4070Ti. And 3070 happens to have 5888, so mby it will be something different. If only one ram amount model coming, I would bet on 12GB.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
3,530 (2.14/day)
System Name Mean machine
Processor 12900k
Motherboard MSI Unify X
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 7600c34
Video Card(s) 4090 Gamerock oc
Storage 980 pro 2tb
Display(s) Samsung crg90
Case Fractal Torent
Audio Device(s) Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack
Power Supply Be quiet dark power pro 1200
Mouse Viper ultimate
Keyboard Blackwidow 65%
The 4070 will be priced too high for mainstream, and that's a guarantee. It sure as hell won't launch at the $499 (or the $549 inflation-adjusted equivalent) of the 3070. The GDDR6X will also be power hungry in a market segment that wants sub-250W cards.

The 4060 will be crippled by 8GB VRAM. The 3070 already is in several of today games and that number is getting bigger rapidly.

Thanks, Nvidia, but you've already f*cked up and you haven't even launched the products yet.
I'm really hoping AMD doesn't drop the ball with the midrange parts this generation. Nvidia, left unchecked, are a plague upon PC gaming. I cannot tell you how many people I've said "buy a console" to in the last 3 years because of dumb pricing - when previously there were good options you could put in a reasonable sub-$1000 build.
Nvidia is a plague, yet the 4070ti is the best raster performance / $ card of this generation. So how can those 2 statement be true at the same time?

And that's excluding the RT performance, DLSS 3, better power draw etc.

The only plague is amd releasing inferior products for more money than nvidia..
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2007
Messages
51 (0.01/day)
Nvidia is a plague, yet the 4070ti is the best raster performance / $ card of this generation. So how can those 2 statement be true at the same time?

And that's excluding the RT performance, DLSS 3, better power draw etc.

The only plague is amd releasing inferior products for more money than nvidia..

The xx70 Ti having higher FPS / $ than the xx80 & xx90 is not the accomplishment you pretend it to be.

What generation has that not been true?

"NVIDIA is a plague, yet they released more than one GPU this generation. So how can those 2 statement be true at the same time?"

These are non-sensical points strung together.
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
3,413 (0.99/day)
System Name M3401 notebook
Processor 5600H
Motherboard NA
Memory 16GB
Video Card(s) 3050
Storage 500GB SSD
Display(s) 14" OLED screen of the laptop
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores 3050 scores good 15-20% lower than average, despite ASUS's claims that it has uber cooling.
I'm waiting for a RTX 4070 Super.....

People should not settle for anything less than "super puper" this gen, given the price on those things.

Maybe even "super puper duper" is worth waiting for.

4070ti is the best raster performance / $ card of this generation
Sure, John:

1678822382650.png
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,332 (3.91/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Nvidia is a plague, yet the 4070ti is the best raster performance / $ card of this generation. So how can those 2 statement be true at the same time?
Uhhh, dude, where are you getting your info from, because it's utter BS.
Here on TPU we use TPU data. If you want to use Nvidia's own marketing numbers, go and argue over on Nvidia.com with the mad fanboys.

1678829263208.png


Even ignoring the price adjustments, both AMD cards are better performance/$ than any AMD 40-series, period.
Taking real-world pricing into account, it's not even funny. All next-gen cards are offensively priced, IMO but when it comes to value, Nvidia are still losing and they're losing hard.

In fact, if you ignore the hypothetical fantasy MSRP of the 4070Ti there, what you have there is a graph where every single AMD card is ahead of every single Nvidia card.
Also, both 3090 cards are ahead of the 4090, the 3080 is ahead of the 4080, and the 3070Ti is ahead of the 4070Ti. Nvidia and value? Please, give me two minutes fetch you a clown costume.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.20/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
The 7900XT is also losing to 3080 in some cases, even though the XT launched at a price 15% higher than the 4070ti. But I guess thats called progress in lisa land


It's not impossible. I have my 4090 capped at 320w and it has similar performance to running stock
Do you avoid the OP (4070) even in Nvidia thread's, wow lol.

It's AMD this, and My 4090 that again, are you serious.

On topic there are no bad card's they say I beg to differ, I wouldn't buy day 1, it's wise to check in with some reputable reviews from Tpu first.

Ps your still on ignore But that shit was so funny I had to say hi.
 
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
3,530 (2.14/day)
System Name Mean machine
Processor 12900k
Motherboard MSI Unify X
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 7600c34
Video Card(s) 4090 Gamerock oc
Storage 980 pro 2tb
Display(s) Samsung crg90
Case Fractal Torent
Audio Device(s) Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack
Power Supply Be quiet dark power pro 1200
Mouse Viper ultimate
Keyboard Blackwidow 65%
Uhhh, dude, where are you getting your info from, because it's utter BS.
Here on TPU we use TPU data. If you want to use Nvidia's own marketing numbers, go and argue over on Nvidia.com with the mad fanboys.

View attachment 287831

Even ignoring the price adjustments, both AMD cards are better performance/$ than any AMD 40-series, period.
Taking real-world pricing into account, it's not even funny. All next-gen cards are offensively priced, IMO but when it comes to value, Nvidia are still losing and they're losing hard.

In fact, if you ignore the hypothetical fantasy MSRP of the 4070Ti there, what you have there is a graph where every single AMD card is ahead of every single Nvidia card.
Also, both 3090 cards are ahead of the 4090, the 3080 is ahead of the 4080, and the 3070Ti is ahead of the 4070Ti. Nvidia and value? Please, give me two minutes fetch you a clown costume.
Was using techspots numbers - actual prices in EU at launch was 929 for cheapest 4070ti and 1049 for cheapest 7900xt. Actually even your own graph shows the 4070ti beating the 7900xt :roll:
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,332 (3.91/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Was using techspots numbers - actual prices in EU at launch was 929 for cheapest 4070ti and 1049 for cheapest 7900xt. Actually even your own graph shows the 4070ti beating the 7900xt :roll:
No you weren't, or at least if you were you weren't reading them properly.

1678870513736.png


On that techspot review, you must have missed a very important paragraph:
"Assuming you can buy a RTX 4070 Ti for $800 -- which in the short term is more of a stretch than a given"
That also still fails to excuse your claim that the 4070Ti is the best performance/$ this generation, too. Even Techspot has the 7900XTX ahead, despite using an unrealistic price for the 4070Ti.

Launch prices for the 4070Ti did in fact turn out to be a scam. Very few base models were made at MSRP, in several countries you can look at retailers who have MRSP models listed but they have no customer reviews (because if they're in stock at all, it was in such pathetically irrelevant quantities). It's why Nvidia has staggered the review embargo for the vanilla 4070 in April, to make sure more MSRP cards are made (and sold) at the MSRP.

That's why any review site or channel worth a damn calls the 4070Ti an $850 card. Because that is realistically the lowest price they sell for.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
3,530 (2.14/day)
System Name Mean machine
Processor 12900k
Motherboard MSI Unify X
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 7600c34
Video Card(s) 4090 Gamerock oc
Storage 980 pro 2tb
Display(s) Samsung crg90
Case Fractal Torent
Audio Device(s) Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack
Power Supply Be quiet dark power pro 1200
Mouse Viper ultimate
Keyboard Blackwidow 65%
No you weren't, or at least if you were you weren't reading them properly.

View attachment 287875

On that techspot review, you must have missed a very important paragraph:
"Assuming you can buy a RTX 4070 Ti for $800 -- which in the short term is more of a stretch than a given"
That also still fails to excuse your claim that the 4070Ti is the best performance/$ this generation, too. Even Techspot has the 7900XTX ahead, despite using an unrealistic price for the 4070Ti.

Launch prices for the 4070Ti did in fact turn out to be a scam. Very few base models were made at MSRP, in several countries you can look at retailers who have MRSP models listed but they have no customer reviews (because if they're in stock at all, it was in such pathetically irrelevant quantities). It's why Nvidia has staggered the review embargo for the vanilla 4070 in April, to make sure more MSRP cards are made (and sold) at the MSRP.

That's why any review site or channel worth a damn calls the 4070Ti an $850 card. Because that is realistically the lowest price they sell for.
But both the msrp prices for the 790xt and the 4070ti weren't realistic. As I've said, actual sale prices in Europe were 929 for the 70ti and 1049 to 1069 for the 7900xt, making the 4070ti the better card in price to performance. And that's just taking only raster into account, no rt, no dlss3, no power consumption.

You are at a point now that you are arguing with facts. I consider this trolling
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2022
Messages
349 (0.39/day)
Location
France
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Motherboard MSI MPG B550I GAMING EDGE WIFI Mini ITX
Cooling Noctua NH-U12S Chromax Black
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro SL 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) 3600MHz CL18
Video Card(s) AMD RX 6750XT Reference Design
Storage 2.5 TB 2.5" SSD / 3 TB HDD
Display(s) ASUS 27" 165HZ VG27WQ / Vertical 16/10 iiyama 25" 75Hz ProLite XUB2595WSU-B1
Case be quiet! Dark Base 700 RGB
Audio Device(s) PSB Alpha P3 / LOXJIE A30 Amp
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 650 GA
Mouse Cooler master MM720
Keyboard Roccat horde
VR HMD Oculus Rift S (please Valve, release a new headset)
Software Windows 10
But both the msrp prices for the 790xt and the 4070ti weren't realistic. As I've said, actual sale prices in Europe were 929 for the 70ti and 1049 to 1069 for the 7900xt, making the 4070ti the better card in price to performance. And that's just taking only raster into account, no rt, no dlss3, no power consumption.

You are at a point now that you are arguing with facts. I consider this trolling
If i take MY price in europe (France), the 4070Ti is starting at 955€ and the 7900XT at 860€ (with reduction on amazon, old price is 970€). Now try to sell your NVidia 4070Ti to me.
See how it can change a lot depending on your country. That's why MSRP is used, and even with this, the 4070Ti is not a better choice for price/performance.

I know that you are paid by NVidia to shill here but as a human, try to understand that nothing is black or white, it's all shade of gray. Kinda lame to always have to say that.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,332 (3.91/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
But both the msrp prices for the 790xt and the 4070ti weren't realistic. As I've said, actual sale prices in Europe were 929 for the 70ti and 1049 to 1069 for the 7900xt, making the 4070ti the better card in price to performance. And that's just taking only raster into account, no rt, no dlss3, no power consumption.

You are at a point now that you are arguing with facts. I consider this trolling
Oh come on, stop digging yourself deeper into a hole of denial.

What country in Europe are you talking about where the 4070Ti is cheaper than a 7900XT? Sure as f*ck isn't France.

You're using made-up pricing that doesn't reflect what anyone else is seeing here, and the reviews you're citing even include disclaimer paragraphs that shed doubt on the likelihood of the MSRP pricing they're using being real.
1678887560829.png
 
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
3,530 (2.14/day)
System Name Mean machine
Processor 12900k
Motherboard MSI Unify X
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 7600c34
Video Card(s) 4090 Gamerock oc
Storage 980 pro 2tb
Display(s) Samsung crg90
Case Fractal Torent
Audio Device(s) Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack
Power Supply Be quiet dark power pro 1200
Mouse Viper ultimate
Keyboard Blackwidow 65%
Oh come on, stop digging yourself deeper into a hole of denial.

What country in Europe are you talking about where the 4070Ti is cheaper than a 7900XT? Sure as f*ck isn't France.

You're using made-up pricing that doesn't reflect what anyone else is seeing here, and the reviews you're citing even include disclaimer paragraphs that shed doubt on the likelihood of the MSRP pricing they're using being real.
View attachment 287897
Sites like idealo and geizhals, track prices throughout Europe. Obviously the xt is cheaper now, since prices officially dropped a couple of weeks ago. Before the recent price drops the xt was 15% more expensive than the 4070ti. I'm talking about products that were on stock, ready to order, 4070ti was at 929 and the xt was at 1029 to 1049.

You can use for example idealo and see price history, you'll see that until February the xt was over 1k euros while the 4070ti was below 950 just as ive stated repeatedly.

Now can you stop arguing with facts

If i take MY price in europe (France), the 4070Ti is starting at 955€ and the 7900XT at 860€ (with reduction on amazon, old price is 970€). Now try to sell your NVidia 4070Ti to me.
See how it can change a lot depending on your country. That's why MSRP is used, and even with this, the 4070Ti is not a better choice for price/performance.

I know that you are paid by NVidia to shill here but as a human, try to understand that nothing is black or white, it's all shade of gray. Kinda lame to always have to say that.
I wish I was paid by nvidia (or amd). Sadly not the case, I'm just reporting facts
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,332 (3.91/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Sites like idealo and geizhals, track prices throughout Europe. Obviously the xt is cheaper now, since prices officially dropped a couple of weeks ago. Before the recent price drops the xt was 15% more expensive than the 4070ti. I'm talking about products that were on stock, ready to order, 4070ti was at 929 and the xt was at 1029 to 1049.

You can use for example idealo and see price history, you'll see that until February the xt was over 1k euros while the 4070ti was below 950 just as ive stated repeatedly.
Why on earth are you arguing with outdated pricing on a news article from THIS WEEK about a launch date in the future?

I guess that's the problem here, you're stuck in the past and your "facts" have expired. They are old, irrelevant data that you should have stopped using BEFORE this news article was ever posted - It's not difficult to understand for everyone here except you, apparently.

Other "facts" that are equally useless, just as an example, are that the 4080 12GB will cost $899. Time invalidates many facts, because they're only factually correct until something changes.
 
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
3,530 (2.14/day)
System Name Mean machine
Processor 12900k
Motherboard MSI Unify X
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 7600c34
Video Card(s) 4090 Gamerock oc
Storage 980 pro 2tb
Display(s) Samsung crg90
Case Fractal Torent
Audio Device(s) Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack
Power Supply Be quiet dark power pro 1200
Mouse Viper ultimate
Keyboard Blackwidow 65%
Why on earth are you arguing with outdated pricing on a news article from THIS WEEK about a launch date in the future?

I guess that's the problem here, you're stuck in the past and your "facts" have expired. They are old, irrelevant data that you should have stopped using BEFORE this news article was ever posted - It's not difficult to understand for everyone here except you, apparently.

Other "facts" that are equally useless, just as an example, are that the 4080 12GB will cost $899. Time invalidates many facts, because they're only factually correct until something changes.
Because launch prices / msrp is the prices products should be compared upon if you are trying to decide which company is scamming people (which was what the post was replying to was arguing). Amds cards dropped in price cause they were worse compared to nvidias products - therefore they weren't selling as much. So it's obvious to me that amd tried to outscam nvidia with their pricing.

It's the same story with the cpus as well. Today both the 7600x and the 7700x are priced decently, but on launch amd tried to pull the heist of the decade.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,332 (3.91/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Because launch prices / msrp is the prices products should be compared upon if you are trying to decide which company is scamming people (which was what the post was replying to was arguing). Amds cards dropped in price cause they were worse compared to nvidias products - therefore they weren't selling as much. So it's obvious to me that amd tried to outscam nvidia with their pricing.

It's the same story with the cpus as well. Today both the 7600x and the 7700x are priced decently, but on launch amd tried to pull the heist of the decade.
In case it's not super-duper-turbo obvious, BOTH companies are scamming people.
Also, MSRP's have been meaningless since 2020. If you're relying on them still, you're a fool. Every hardware review site and channel has repeated this incessantly for the last three years. If you ignore that advice, it's entirely on you.

Pricing of the 7900XT is just reflecting the real performance. It's 5/6ths of the 7900XTX so it should cost (at most) 5/6ths the price.
 
Top