• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Plays the VRAM Card Against NVIDIA

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
16,182 (2.27/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
In a blog post, AMD has pulled the VRAM card against NVIDIA, telling potential graphics card buyers that they should consider AMD over NVIDIA, because current and future games will require more VRAM, especially at higher resolution. There's no secret that there has been something of a consensus from at least some of the PC gaming crowd that NVIDIA is being too stingy when it comes to VRAM on its graphics cards and AMD is clearly trying to cash in on that sentiment with its latest blog post. AMD is showing the VRAM usage in games such as Resident Evil 4—with and without ray tracing at that—The Last of US Part I and Hogwarts Legacy, all games that use over 11 GB of VRAM or more.

AMD does have a point here, but as the company has as yet to launch anything below the Radeon RX 7900 XT in the 7000-series, AMD is mostly comparing its 6000-series of cards with NVIDIA's 3000-series of cards, most of which are getting hard to purchase and potentially less interesting for those looking to upgrade their system. That said, AMD also compares its two 7000-series cards to the NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti and the RTX 4080, claiming up to a 27 percent lead over NVIDIA in performance. Based on TPU's own tests of some of these games, albeit most likely using different test scenarios, the figures provided by AMD don't seem to reflect real world performance. It's also surprising to see AMD claims its RX 7900 XTX beats NVIDIA's RTX 4080 in ray tracing performance in Resident Evil 4 by 23 percent, where our own tests shows NVIDIA in front by a small margin. Make what you want of this, but one thing is fairly certain and that is that future games will require more VRAM, but most likely the need for a powerful GPU isn't going to go away.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Joined
Aug 12, 2019
Messages
1,780 (1.02/day)
Location
LV-426
System Name Custom
Processor i9 9900k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 arous master
Cooling corsair h150i
Memory 4x8 3200mhz corsair
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 EX Gamer White OC
Storage 500gb Samsung 970 Evo PLus
Display(s) MSi MAG341CQ
Case Lian Li Pc-011 Dynamic
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro Wireless
Power Supply 850w Seasonic Focus Platinum
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Logitech G110
interesting ... i wonder if nvidia will answer with 4080ti with 20gb or 24gb vram...
must say that resident evil 4 with rt enabled result caught me by surprise...
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
3,890 (0.86/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory Team Group Dark Pro 8Pack Edition 3600Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 FE
Storage Kingston A2000 1TB + Seagate HDD workhorse
Display(s) Samsung 50" QN94A Neo QLED
Case Antec 1200
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-850
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 11
They have been playing the VRAM card for years, except for Fury X, when HBM was going to be some sort of magic.
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
1,786 (0.41/day)
Location
Netherlands
System Name TheDeeGee's PC
Processor Intel Core i7-11700
Motherboard ASRock Z590 Steel Legend
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory Crucial Ballistix 3200/C16 32GB
Video Card(s) Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti 12GB
Storage Crucial P5 Plus 2TB / Crucial P3 Plus 2TB / Crucial P3 Plus 4TB
Display(s) EIZO CX240
Case Lian-Li O11 Dynamic Evo XL
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster ZxR / AKG K601 Headphones
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME Fanless TX-700
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Keychron Q6
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
Benchmark Scores None, as long as my games runs smooth.
All they're showing is how shit PC ports are.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
21,049 (5.96/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
All they're showing is how shit PC ports are.
That's just a reality, deal with it. The fact remains AMD has you covered regardless of how shit the port is, and Nvidia doesn't.

Consoles have been defining the baseline resource needs for decades now, the writing was always on the wall. That 4070ti you got there is going to run into trouble sooner rather than later.

They have been playing the VRAM card for years, except for Fury X, when HBM was going to be some sort of magic.
Yep... that alone proves the point either way, Fury X fell off much faster than the 6GB 980ti while they were about equal on launch.

Now the tables are turned.
Its pretty ironic to see crappy VRAM caps on cards by the same company pushing RT which requires additional VRAM over non RT, don't you think.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,034 (0.78/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 / 16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, NVMes everywhere / NVMes, more NVMes / Various storage, SATA SSD mostly
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 / Windows 7
They have 4 pictures with charts on their blog post

1681291253235.png


1681291291535.png


1681291305156.png



1681291317653.png



The higher we move in tiers, the more green lines we see at the bottom. Also in the 7900XT vs 4070Ti the Perf/$ comparison is missing. I wonder why.

AMD does have a point here, and Hardware Unboxed did offered us a good reason to avoid models that are VRAM limited even today.

 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
8,041 (3.16/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 7900X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E E Strix
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled)
Storage Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500
Display(s) GIGABYTE FV43U
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Deepcool 1000M
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121
Expect this trend to continue to grow instead of diminish. AMD is is in the Xbox and PS5. That means that Games that are made for all 3 are already optimized for AMD. One of the things I have noticed about AMD on new Games is how consistent the Clocks are. Translating to ultra smooth Gameplay. This is why for me averages mean nothing and 1% lows are everything. Once you go X3D you don't go back.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
5,410 (0.97/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k -> 12600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0 -> Gigabyte Z690 Auros Elite DDR4
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120 -> Custom Watercoolingloop
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz -> Crucial (8x2) 16gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480 -> RX7800XT
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb -> 2tb MVMe SSD
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television) -> Dell S3220DGF
Case antec 600 -> Thermaltake Tenor HTCP case
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Just make better products or lower the price and work a bit on your image if you want to sell, that 80/less than 20 split on steam is of course rediculous.., having said that they have a point sure but if a whole generation is stuck on 8gb I'm not sure if devs will want to push progress in that area, so less progress then possible but fewer issues for gamers
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
21,049 (5.96/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
Just make better products or lower the price and work a bit on your image if you want to sell, that 80/less than 20 split on steam is of course rediculous.., having said that they have a point sure but if a whole generation is stuck on 8gb I'm not sure if devs will want to push progress in that area, so less progress then possible but fewer issues for gamers
Devs already are pushing in that area and even Nvidia is helping them push it that way ;) So what segment of the market's offerings is going to step on the brakes here? Its going to be (and already is) solved by dialing down settings or dynamically dropping image quality. Fan-tas-tic!

The only fools that don't seem to want to get that are the ones who bought into low VRAM GPUs at a premium. Sucks to be them. They've been warned a million times. But going by their own cognitive dissonance, they don't care, so all is well in the world isn't it? They're not skipping games from devs that push over 12GB requirements either, so who's really losing here?

I'm just sittin here enjoying my popcorn right now.
A few months ago people were still selling 2nd hand 3080 10GBs at (way) over 700 EUR over here. Try that now. Lmao. Ampere and also most of Ada are going to go down as the least future proof gens in a long long time. Now you know why Ampere's stack is a full blown mess of too low initial and far too high VRAM capacities in the rebound. Nvidia knew it, and they're still pushing for planned obscolescence, and people are still in denial.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
45 (0.08/day)
All they're showing is how shit PC ports are.
The only port that is shit is TLOU Part 1, games like RE4 and HWL are fine.
Nvidia has been pushing planned obsolescence on cards with only 8GB of VRAM since the RTX 20 series, newer games are only going to continue to use more VRAM.
 
Joined
Aug 5, 2019
Messages
798 (0.46/day)
System Name Apex Raptor: Silverback
Processor Intel i9 13900KS 6.2GHz/Allcore5.9
Motherboard z790 Apex
Cooling LT720 360mm + Phanteks T30
Memory 32GB @8000MT/s CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090
Storage 990 PRO 2TB / Firecuda 530 2TB
Display(s) Neo G8 / C1 65"
Case Antec Performance 1
Audio Device(s) DT 1990 Pro / Motu M2
Power Supply Prime Ultra Titanium 1000w
Mouse Scimitar Pro
Keyboard K95 Platinum
Love how picky with enabling RT in all games they were, probably because they get murdered in these with RT always on.
Youre touting high end gpu superiority, gotta enable RT always.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,057 (3.37/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
Even though this is just for marketing purposes, yes it obviously does matter.

Love how picky with enabling RT in all games they were, probably because they get murdered in these with RT always on.
Youre touting high end gpu superiority, gotta enable RT always.
Control is on there which is one of the heaviest games to run, neither the 7900XTX or 4080 get 60fps natively, I'd say it's representative enough, TPU found that the 4080 is 15% faster on average with RT on.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
1,295 (0.48/day)
Is this the first official posting of the 7900xt at a lower price ($849)?
 
Joined
May 20, 2020
Messages
1,300 (0.89/day)
This time AMD was right, more RAM for such big (poorly done?) games is crucial for smooth gameplay. nvidia of course does what they do best, gives their customers good for now, but overall sub-par products.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2021
Messages
1,060 (1.06/day)
Finally AMD themselves have spoken about VRAM, something that tech community has been showing for quite some time is an increasing issue with good or bad aging of cards.

3070 and 3070Ti are great examples of so badly aging cards with 8GB if VRAM. The same will happen in 2 years with 4070 and 4070Ti. Nvidia knows this and tries to force customers to upgrade sooner rather than later.

As always, in order to maximize profits for shareholders, companies are often being anti-consumer.
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
45 (0.08/day)
Consoles have been defining the baseline resource needs for decades now, the writing was always on the wall. That 4070ti you got there is going to run into trouble sooner rather than later.
I honestly doubt most 4070Ti owners will even care, when those that pay a premium high tier price for a midrange card, most people can likely replace it when Nvidia wants them to.
Its pretty ironic to see crappy VRAM caps on cards by the same company pushing RT which requires additional VRAM over non RT, don't you think.
Yeah its interesting to see cards that were beating AMD's 6000 series now fall behind due to VRAM limitations, and the excuses of ports being shit or unoptimized are silly when RT also requires more VRAM. And of course Nvidia only provides sufficient VRAM if you buy the 4080 or 4090.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 11, 2020
Messages
176 (0.12/day)
low ram is the reason I will avoid of buying 4070 (ti), and go for 4080/4090

This time AMD was right, more RAM for such big (poorly done?) games is crucial for smooth gameplay. nvidia of course does what they do best, gives their customers good for now, but overall sub-par products.
Amd right, coz its 2023, and not 2015, and having 12GB of ram in ~800$ graphics card is super outdated
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2022
Messages
998 (1.30/day)
All they're showing is how shit PC ports are.

PC has never been the most important platform and it has not been the showcase platform either for decades now. The showcase platform is the consoles. The PC is the 1080p 60hz low details platform dominated by x060 cards and then stuff like 1660s. People need to accept that.
 
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
1,059 (0.20/day)
Location
Porto
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Pro
Cooling AiO 240mm
Memory 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast 3600MHz CL18
Video Card(s) Radeon RX 6900XT Reference (amd.com)
Storage O.S.: 256GB SATA | 2x 1TB SanDisk SSD SATA Data | Games: 1TB Samsung 970 Evo
Display(s) LG 34" UWQHD
Audio Device(s) X-Fi XtremeMusic + Gigaworks SB750 7.1 THX
Power Supply XFX 850W
Mouse Logitech G502 Wireless
VR HMD Lenovo Explorer
Software Windows 10 64bit
The higher we move in tiers, the more green lines we see at the bottom.

That makes sense, considering Nvidia's mid tiers are the ones with significantly lower amounts of VRAM.
The 3070 Ti is an especially bad offender in this area. I wonder how it compares to the much cheaper 6700XT 12GB in the lower 1% and 0.1% of these latest 2023 AAA games, or even how it compares to the RTX 3060 12GB.
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
2,760 (2.24/day)
Location
Slovenia
Processor i5-6600K
Motherboard Asus Z170A
Cooling some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar
Memory 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
Display(s) 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200
Case Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh
Audio Device(s) E-mu 1212m PCI
Power Supply Seasonic G-360
Mouse Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse
Keyboard Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994
Software Oldwin
Let's see what DirectStorage (along with DX12 Upload Heaps) can do for games - provided it ever becomes widely used.
One of the things DS can do is decompression from memory. Compressed game assets can be stored in system RAM, then transfered to VRAM and decompressed with fast algorithms on the GPU on the fly. Ideally this could reduce the need for more VRAM but it takes additional effort to optimise for the PC platform.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
566 (0.13/day)
Processor i5 4670K - @ 4.8GHZ core
Motherboard MSI Z87 G43
Cooling Thermalright Ultra-120 *(Modded to fit on this motherboard)
Memory 16GB 2400MHZ
Video Card(s) HD7970 GHZ edition Sapphire
Storage Samsung 120GB 850 EVO & 4X 2TB HDD (Seagate)
Display(s) 42" Panasonice LED TV @120Hz
Case Corsair 200R
Audio Device(s) Xfi Xtreme Music with Hyper X Core
Power Supply Cooler Master 700 Watts
Translation: our cards suck, but we put a lot of VRAM in them because that was the only thing we could do to make them look more valuable.
Did you even see the chart ?
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,256 (1.70/day)
Location
Austin Texas
Processor 13700KF Undervolted @ 5.6/ 5.5, 4.8Ghz Ring 200W PL1
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 w/ Arctic P12 Fans
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2x 2TB WDC SN850, 1TB Samsung 960 prr
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case SLIGER S620
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard RoyalAxe
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
If you don't think about DLSS, coil whine, janky coolers, or actual RT performance (not just some light RT shadows here and there) it is technically true. More VRAM is better.
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2022
Messages
500 (0.58/day)
Translation: our cards suck, but we put a lot of VRAM in them because that was the only thing we could do to make them look more valuable.
The Australian YouTube channel can’t remember it’s name did a very telling video last week.
textures disappearing and games looking like shit because of it on 8GB cards.

with dram prices collapsing like now there is no reason for nvidia to not make the 4070 a 16gb card
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top