Oh please...
We have a rich history of companies sitting on a release of X or Y so they can make more money with last-year's Z.
We have a history of Google and Apple buying start-ups to add to their semi-walled gardens. Start ups with great innovative ideas. You're right, you get the ideas, still, but now disguised as a Google or Apple product.
You mention EA, and 'sure is notorious for'... exactly. Bioware is one very good example of how its corporate control quickly destroyed a talented studio. EA buried more studios than the economy did by now I reckon.
Even just the way releases are going to be timed is in MS hands, so they can maximize exposure for all their filler content. Activision no longer competes with whatever shooter MS was going to make either, so MS might just not make one right now, they have CoD.
Do you need more examples? I can fill three pages without blinking if you need it. If you have the slightest grasp of how business works, you can too, its not hard...
no need for name calling etc, I said what I said and I think im being more then reasonable in that statement, nothing of what you said so far is disputing it either.
The idea of MS making a competing product to CoD if they could not buy CoD is a possibility sure, but at the same time, they might just want to buy it because they know they are not going to be able to compete, heck look at how gamers treat the very existence of the Epic Store, here you have competition and everyone hates them for it....
And if a CoD clone would come people would lable it as a lame clone and stick with CoD, is it possible to clone CoD and market it in such a way that people gravitate to that instead? probably. Will MS or any company even attempt it? no, waste of time and money most likely.
So why not just buy CoD and just like I suggested, be one company above it, then it does not matter for the consumer.
and I once again would like to hammer on the fact that this has NOTHING to do with cloudgaming so that UK argument is just silly.
Nor the idea of choice because they and you as well insinuate there would/will be competition (that currently does not exist either) if the deal is canceled, which is one hell of a baseless crystal ball argument.
And actually sure, give me those three pages without blinking, games that would have been totally awesome and numerous if they werent bought by big corporations, heck you could ask why they would even need those big corporations to own them in the first place....
EDIT: actually nvm on the last part, this is a silly argument all in all.
You are talking about big business consuming even more businesses, height of capitalism, bad stuff and in general I do agree with that.
Its just in this case that I think literally nothing of value is lost or gained from MS buying A/B apart from maybe that scumbag company becoming slightly less scumbaggy.
A/B produce shitty games that drain people purposely from their money, praying on those mentally less strong, personally I would see them gone rather bought up, but I dont see any possible negative consequences from this purchase emerging.
Worst case is no CoD competitor, oh no....whatever shall we do....