- Joined
- Oct 28, 2012
- Messages
- 1,267 (0.28/day)
Processor | AMD Ryzen 3700x |
---|---|
Motherboard | asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming |
Cooling | Deepcool LS520 SE |
Memory | crucial ballistix 32Gb DDR4 |
Video Card(s) | RTX 3070 FE |
Storage | WD sn550 1To/WD ssd sata 1To /WD black sn750 1To/Seagate 2To/WD book 4 To back-up |
Display(s) | LG GL850 |
Case | Dan A4 H2O |
Audio Device(s) | sennheiser HD58X |
Power Supply | Corsair SF600 |
Mouse | MX master 3 |
Keyboard | Master Key Mx |
Software | win 11 pro |
There's no competition in the 5120x2160 market, so they don't have any pressure to do better. High refresh rate on a professional monitor is also a rarity. Asus is alone: Eizo, Benq, Dell, HP are happy to give you 60hz on their best monitor.Are they serious? £1,500 for a monitor with the worst energy rating G, low refresh rare and lack of 10-bit image? Old HDMI 2.0 ports that cannot fully drive the monitor due to limited bandwidth? LG, WTF? DOA.
It's astonishing how arrogant monitor prices are, and yet they have less advanced panels and features than their own majestic TVs. LG monitor division should withdraw this dinosaur product and go back to drawing board of modern video connectivity and features. Disgrace.
Even though mini led is known to be desirable by pros, there's only a push on laptops, a few gaming monitors, or the expensive mini led ProArt. It's like they just want to wait for their OLED panels to get better over than evolving their LCD offerings. (Well, they did make IPS black with a high contrast ratio for an IPS, but it's still edge lit)