AMD Radeon RX 7600 GPU-Z Screenshot Leaked

[T0@st]

AMD Radeon RX 7600 GPU-related leaks continue to trickle out as we get closer to the late May launch window, when AMD's entry-level model is predicted to take on the upcoming NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 graphics card. Details of Sapphire and MSI RX 7600 (non-XT) custom cards have appeared online over the past week and a half, with basic GPU specifications spotted on retail packaging. VideoCardz has received yet another tip-off and has today released a screenshot from a GPU-Z session. We cannot confirm the accuracy of the specs due to our own NDA with AMD, but we can confirm that GPU-Z since version 2.53.0 does have early support the Navi 33 GPU.

The listed details of a "Navi 33 XL GPU" correlate with leaked information from the past week or two, confirming the presence of 32 Compute Units and 2048 Stream Processors. The standard allocation of 8 GB GDDR6 memory is verified once more, complete with a 128-bit wide memory interface. VideoCardz notes that the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is quite similar in terms of memory technicalities - with a maximum bandwidth of 288 GB/s (Gen 4 PCIe interface restricted to 8 lanes). GPU-Z states that the Navi 33 XL/RX 7600 GPU has the following core clock speeds: 1720 MHz (base), 2250 MHz (performance game mode) and 2655 MHz (boosted) - tipsters have suggested that the chip is capable of hitting a maximum threshold of 2850 MHz.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source

 

[Paranoir andando]

1/3 of full Navi3. And 8GB of ram. The replacement for the AMD low-medium range as R7 260X, RX 460, RX 560, etc (cards of $100 - $150).

...and only 8x pcie. A bigger problem if the GPU runs out of memory and has to look for it through the pcie 3.0 (quite common among people who buy mid-low cards)
Price?

 

[ZoneDymo]

what a boring piece of crap

 

[ks2]

1/3 of full Navi3. And 8GB of ram. The replacement for the AMD low-medium range as R7 260X, RX 460, RX 560, etc (cards of $100 - $150).

...and only 8x pcie. A bigger problem if the GPU runs out of memory and has to look for it through the pcie 3.0 (quite common among people who buy mid-low cards)
Price?

8xpcie3.0 is enough for a card like this.

 

[btk2k2]

$250 at most or it is pointless.

 

[david salsero]

1/3 de Navi3 completo. Y 8GB de ram. El reemplazo de la gama media-baja de AMD como R7 260X, RX 460, RX 560, etc (tarjetas de $100 - $150).

...y solo 8x pcie. Un problema mayor si la GPU se queda sin memoria y hay que buscarla a través de la pcie 3.0 (bastante común entre la gente que compra tarjetas medias-bajas)
¿Precio?

90% of users will no longer need dedicated graphics in laptops and ultrabooks with the new AMD ZEN 4 7040 Phoenix= LPDDR5 + RDNA 3 + USB 4.0 + HDMI 2.1 + AI with XDNA architecture developed by Xilinx and all at 4nm vs 10nm from Intel .
It is incredible that OEMs have in their hands the best quality/price processor for Ultrabook and no product comes out
It cannot be said that it is TSMC's fault that the 4nm node is already very mature, so where are the OEMs with different ultrabooks. ?????
What happens to AMD that their processors surpass Intel but their products do not only come out with consoles with AMD Z1 for gamers.

 

[HD64G]

$200-250 is a good launch price, $250-300 is mediocre in value and over $300 is expensive.

 

[QuietBob]

Basically a 6650XT, but with only half the amount of ROPs, resulting in pixel throughput lower than the 6500XT
The 6650XT is now going for as little as $230 here, so this better be well under $200.

 

[THU31]

So in 2016, the RX 480 had 36 CUs and 8 GB on a 256-bit bus (256 GB/s). All that for $240.

7 years later you get 32 CUs and 8 GB on a 128-bit bus (288 GB/s). I assume it will cost ~$250, which seems too high anyway.

Yeah, it's a different architecture, and the clocks are more than two times higher, but come on. This won't even have any significant efficiency improvement compared to RDNA2, being made on 6 nm.

It's sad what these companies are doing. Any real evolution only happens at the high end.

 

[3x0]

Basically a 6650XT, but with only half the amount of ROPs, resulting in pixel throughput lower than the 6500XT
The 6650XT is now going for as little as $230 here, so this better be well under $200.

Most likely an incorrect reading from GPUz since it's not supported yet.

$200-250 is a good launch price, $250-300 is mediocre in value and over $300 is expensive.

Yup, agree with this. ~RX 6700(XT) performance, 2GB VRAM less for <250$ is fine.

But if this is using the full N33 die, what will the 7600XT be, if it exists at all?

 

[HD64G]

Most likely an incorrect reading from GPUz since it's not supported yet.

Yup, agree with this. ~RX 6700(XT) performance, 2GB VRAM less for <250$ is fine.

But if this is using the full N33 die, what will the 7600XT be, if it exists at all?

My best guess it that the 7600 might end up having performance between 6650XT and 6700XT. The full die XT isn't likely to come out at all for desktop. Most possibly, the desktop 7600 is a mobile focused GPU as 6600 was and that's why it has pcie x8. The XT is the best binned chips that will end up in mobile that need the best efficiency.

So in 2016, the RX 480 had 36 CUs and 8 GB on a 256-bit bus (256 GB/s). All that for $240.

7 years later you get 32 CUs and 8 GB on a 128-bit bus (288 GB/s). I assume it will cost ~$250, which seems too high anyway.

Yeah, it's a different architecture, and the clocks are more than two times higher, but come on. This won't even have any significant efficiency improvement compared to RDNA2, being made on 6 nm.

It's sad what these companies are doing. Any real evolution only happens at the high end.

Polaris was a hit due to its price, not its efficiency. 7600 will have power draw below 150W. If priced low enough, it will become the new polaris.

 

[3x0]

The full die XT isn't likely to come out at all for desktop

The RX 7600 is the full die N33 with 32CU.

 

[Minus Infinity]

$250 at most or it is pointless.

Honestly $199 IMO is more appropriate for 8GB in 2023 at this cut-down level of performance.

 

[btk2k2]

The RX 7600 is the full die N33 with 32CU.

Makes me wonder what N33 XT will have over N33 XL. Better bins and 16GB of VRAM or will AMD not bother with N33 XT on desktop and make 7600XT a 40CU 2SE 12GB N32 based card. That could probably fit nicely in a $350 MSRP and offer 4060Ti/3070 tier performance for $50 less than NV and give you 50% more VRAM as well.

AMD does have options here to offer something compelling so lets see how they mess it up.

 

[Marcus L]

Honestly $199 IMO is more appropriate for 8GB in 2023 at this cut-down level of performance.

Good luck with that, it will be priced slightly lower than the competing 4060 and stay there until the 4060 comes down, as they have both done with the higher end sku's of 4000/7000 cards, almost like they are in collusion, surely not though....

 

[btk2k2]

Polaris was a hit due to its price, not its efficiency. 7600 will have power draw below 150W. If priced low enough, it will become the new polaris.

Polaris also had about 2x the performance of the consoles and enough VRAM to keep it going until pretty recently.

The closest you can get to that right now is a 6800XT 16GB but they are not exactly polaris priced. Maybe if AMD decide the 7700XT needs to be 16GB you might be able to get something close ish for $450 but still not as good value as Polaris was.

 

[3x0]

Makes me wonder what N33 XT will have over N33 XL. Better bins and 16GB of VRAM or will AMD not bother with N33 XT on desktop and make 7600XT a 40CU 2SE 12GB N32 based card. That could probably fit nicely in a $350 MSRP and offer 4060Ti/3070 tier performance for $50 less than NV and give you 50% more VRAM as well.

AMD does have options here to offer something compelling so lets see how they mess it up.

Well, I guess they could increase PCIe Gen 4 to x16 from x8, judging by N33 XT in the mobile 7600M XT

AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT Specs

AMD Navi 33, 2469 MHz, 2048 Cores, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 8192 MB GDDR6, 2250 MHz, 128 bit

www.techpowerup.com