• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Alleged Logitech G Pro X Hyperlight Wireless Gaming Mouse Appears Online

Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
21,432 (3.40/day)
System Name Pioneer
Processor Ryzen R9 9950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310
Storage Intel 905p Optane 960GB boot, +2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs
Display(s) 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display
Case Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s) TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W
Mouse Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless
Keyboard WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps
Software Gentoo Linux x64 / Windows 11 Enterprise IoT 2024
You would think that is the case, but it is not, the intervals are not in lock step with the monitor. Blurbusters did a whole write up on why higher hz mice are needed, I can't find the specific article at the moment, but here is their opinion.

I honestly can say if I haven't noticed it on my 120hz monitor I really don't think I need a table proving to me I need an upgrade. Ignorance in this case saves cpu cycles.

Also, lol at believing any jitter less than 1ms could possibly be detected by a human.

If they really want to fix this "issue" the way to do it would be to lock the sensor poll to the monitor refresh rate. But big numbers sell.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2011
Messages
97 (0.02/day)
Also, lol at believing any jitter less than 1ms could possibly be detected by a human.
It’s not belief in this case, those numbers are based off a research study done on jitter the average human can perceive. It’s all there in the included research study citation. I agree, if some how they could link the polling rate into a multiple of the gsync/freesync refresh rate that would be optimal, but I am not sure how feasible that is to do.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2020
Messages
234 (0.15/day)
Location
Hungary
System Name Main rig
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700 @ 3.5 GHz/1.18750 V|SoC 0.9 V
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty B450 Gaming-ITX/ac |BIOS 3.80
Cooling Noctua NH-D9L
Memory 2 x 8 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 @ 3200/C18-18-18-36|1T /1.25 V
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 950 SC+ ACX 2.0 2 GB GDDR5
Storage 500 GB Crucial MX500|1 TB Crucial MX500|250 GB Intel 510|128 GB Netac N600S|6+2 TB WD Purple
Display(s) 2 x LG 24GM77-B @ 144 Hz, DAS on, Motion 240 off | 1 x Icy Box VESA arm @ pivot
Case Fractal Design Define Nano S (no window, 1 x Noctua A14 PWM + 1 x Noctua NF-S12B redux-1200 PWM)
Audio Device(s) Edifier R1700 BTs
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Fanless PX-500
Mouse HSK|Hati S|Hati M Ace|Skoll SK-S|Pulsar Xlite|MM710|MM730|NP-01|Viper M.|Krait|MX300|MX500 etc
Keyboard Ducky One 3 TKL |One 3 SF|One 2 Horizon|Miya Pro|Akko 3068B Plus|Huntsman TE|K70 Pro Mini WL etc
VR HMD 3xShidenkai XS|Zero Classic XS|Hien XS|Raiden XS|P-51|Turbulence Teal SE|Talent L|2xAllsop XL etc
Software MS Windows 10 Home x64
Benchmark Scores over 9000
I honestly can say if I haven't noticed it on my 120hz monitor
No surprise, as it needs at least a 240, but more so a 360 Hz (or even faster) display (and 3-digit frame rates) to be noticeable, taking granted that you, the person, are physiologically capable to do that. And ofc you need software (besides possibly some OS/BIOS settings) that supports it as well.

tl;dr: Not everbody can or will see the difference, as it needs a few things aligning, starting with the hardware, continuing with software and having the person as the ultimate filter, because we are not exact replicas of the same übermensch specimen biologically speaking, meaning our physical abilities/parameters can differ to a great degree.
 
Last edited:
Top