Jackery Solar Generator 2000 Plus Reinterprets the Next-Generation Solar Generator

[AleksandarK]

Jackery, a global leader in innovative portable power and green outdoor energy solutions, managed to captivate audiences at Intersolar Europe 2023 in Munich and Outdoor Retailer 2023 in Salt Lake City with its latest breakthrough in next-generation solar generators. In the past weeks, people had the opportunity to experience the cutting-edge technology packed into the Jackery Solar Generator 2000 Plus—a true game-changer in the field of high-performance energy storage solutions for outdoor adventures and off-grid living.

As an industry frontrunner, Jackery continues to redefine the boundaries of portable power with a relentless commitment to reliability, performance, and functionality. The Jackery Solar Generator 2000 Plus epitomizes the brand's unwavering dedication to technological innovation and design philosophy centered around functionality, versatility, and performance. It represents the latest addition to Jackery's signature solar generator lineup, which has already garnered a loyal following among van lifers, off-grid households, and emergency responders worldwide.



The 2 exhibitions served as the perfect platforms for Jackery to showcase its latest advancements in sustainable travel and low-carbon lifestyle solutions. Visitors were introduced to the Solar Generator 2000 Plus, featuring a new array of upgraded features focused on reliability, performance, and functionality. As more customers seek powerful energy storage solutions for their outdoor adventures and off-grid living, Jackery aims to raise the bar in the portable power industry with its innovative offerings.

Jackery's commitment to technological innovation and design excellence has put the brand to market leadership. The European market, in particular, has witnessed remarkable growth, with a surge of 417% compared to the previous year. The brand's extensive experience and expertise in solar energy are evident in their highly anticipated Plus series, including the Jackery Solar Generator 2000 Plus and the Jackery Solar Generator Pro family, both of which offer reliable electricity backup solutions for unforeseen emergencies.

Key features of the Jackery Solar Generator 2000 Plus, weight, and reliance on diesel fuel, have posed challenges for outdoor enthusiasts and eco-conscious individuals. In response, Jackery has developed solar generators that promote sustainable power generation. The Jackery Solar Generator 2000 Plus empowers users to explore the outdoors sustainably, offering a closed-loop electricity supply system that encompasses power lus include its sustainable and user-friendly design. Traditional generators, characterized by noigeneration, storage, and consumption. By combining the outdoor power supply with solar panels, customers can enjoy electricity off the grid during their outdoor adventures while also benefiting from a reliable home backup power solution.

The Jackery Solar Generator 2000 Plus offers seamless power management through its smart app, allowing users to control the device with ease. With just a few taps on their smartphones, users can effortlessly manage and monitor their power supply, making power management more convenient than ever before.

The Jackery Solar Generator 2000 Plus boasts exceptional expandability and preparedness. It allows for capacity expansion up to 6000 W (US), providing ample power to run essential devices. Additionally, the battery can charge rapidly, going from 0% to 100% capacity in just 2 hours (US) when connected to a wall outlet. The system's versatility is further enhanced by the ability to support up to 5 additional battery packs simultaneously, providing an astounding 24kWh (US) of power. Whether embarking on road trips, engaging in outdoor camping, managing heavy-duty usage, or preparing for home emergencies, the Solar Generator 2000 Plus is the ideal power solution.

One of the standout features of the Jackery Solar Generator 2000 Plus is its ultra-fast solar charging capability. Thanks to its advanced IBC technology, the generator can be fully charged in just 2 hours using six SolarSaga 200 W solar panels. This superior technology ensures optimal performance even in high temperatures and cloudy weather conditions, providing a 50% increase in power generation compared to conventional solar panels (PERC) in low light conditions, thanks to its improved spectral response.

The Jackery Solar Generator 2000 Plus incorporates a Safe (LiFePO4) LFP battery cell, which has a lifespan of up to 10 years, even with everyday use. The battery maintains a level of 70% even after being charged 4,000 times. Jackery's ChargeShield technology employs a unique stepped variable-speed charging algorithm, enhancing safety and increasing the lifespan of the battery pack by 50%. Even at high temperatures of 45°C, the power station can be fully charged in approximately 5.5 hours. This innovative charging technology strikes the perfect balance between charging speed and overall safety, providing a comprehensive and secure charging experience.

It is worth mentioning that the Jackery Solar Generator 2000 Plus received recognition from the prestigious international sustainability award, SEAL Awards, immediately upon its market debut. Alongside products from more than 10 leading international brands such as General Electric, IBM, and Cisco Systems, the Jackery Solar Generator 2000 Plus was honored with the 2023 SEAL Sustainable Product Award.

Jackery's presence at the 2 international exhibitions signifies its commitment to driving the transition towards sustainable energy solutions. The Jackery Solar Generator 2000 Plus represents a leap forward in portable solar technology, offering customers an environmentally friendly, money-saving, and easy-to-operate power solution.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site

 

[zlobby]

Hmm, I didn't know that Watts and kWh are different in the U.S.

 

[R-T-B]

Hmm, I didn't know that Watts and kWh are different in the U.S.

They aren't. But the voltage outputs are, and that may affect runtime and thus the kWh figures.

 

[LabRat 891]

Jackery's turning into a dick joke with all this marketing wank...

Not an excuse but, I can't discount 'the need' for separating one's brand from the highly-saturated "Solar Generator" market. -just, everything about this PR rubs me the wrong way.

 

[TheinsanegamerN]

Hmm, I didn't know that Watts and kWh are different in the U.S.

Watts are a measure of power, specifically amperage x voltage.

kWh is a measure of power delivery over a period of time, 1 kWh is 1000 watts of power in an hour.

This battery pack can deliver the equivalent of 24,000 watts per hour in output. that doesnt mean it actually holds 24000 watts of power however.

 

[Icon Charlie]

Watts are a measure of power, specifically amperage x voltage.

kWh is a measure of power delivery over a period of time, 1 kWh is 1000 watts of power in an hour.

This battery pack can deliver the equivalent of 24,000 watts per hour in output. that doesnt mean it actually holds 24000 watts of power however.

That is very true.

The posting is a lot of market speak.
Again. If you want real information about this type of equipment, go to Will Prowse on Youtube.
He's one of the few that I trust in his assessments of solar power equipment.

 

[JoeTheDestroyer]

Watts are a measure of power

Yes

specifically amperage x voltage.

for example, amps * volts
but also, N*m/s, kg*m^2/s^3, and any other combination of units that represents energy use or collection

kWh is a measure of power delivery over a period of time, 1 kWh is 1000 watts of power in an hour.

No. kWh is a unit of energy, just like the Joule. (1 kWh = 3.6MJ)
It can be used in any situation to describe energy, but tends to be used in situations where power usage over a significant period of time (i.e. hours) is under discussion.
It is not restricted to discussing power usage over exactly one hour. 1kWh can just as easily describe 2000 watts used over 30min or 500 watts used over 2h.

This battery pack can deliver the equivalent of 24,000 watts per hour in output. that doesnt mean it actually holds 24000 watts of power however.

No, the opposite.
The product is advertised as having a capacity of 2-24kWh, meaning the batteries hold that much energy (in other words, up to 86.4MJ of energy).
The inverter can drain the battery to produce up to 6kW of mains (120/240V AC) power.
Thus, with the most expensive configuration, the device has a minimum runtime of 4 hours: 6kW * 4h = 24kWh. (Ignoring inefficiencies of the battery and inverter systems.)

 

[Ferrum Master]

I am not sure about the philosophical point of this device.

You go to nature relaxing and still bring all your electronics garbage with you... WHY??

Other than that... looks fine... only the stupid winter scene... you cannot really use it in cold.

 

[zlobby]

Watts are a measure of power, specifically amperage x voltage.

kWh is a measure of power delivery over a period of time, 1 kWh is 1000 watts of power in an hour.

This battery pack can deliver the equivalent of 24,000 watts per hour in output. that doesnt mean it actually holds 24000 watts of power however.

And this is relevant to my point how exactly?

They aren't. But the voltage outputs are, and that may affect runtime and thus the kWh figures.

Thanks, I'm well aware. To be absolutely precise, W and kWh for that matter are universal. Runtime, however is dependant on the load and charge-discharge characteristics on the batteries. Their wording is lame.

 

[LabRat 891]

And this is relevant to my point how exactly?

I believe he missed the sardonic bit, but was trying to 'point out' that Watts and kWh are the same, no matter the mains voltage and typical ampacity for branch circuits.

Jackery was specific to mention "(US)", probably to imply testing done @ 110-125VAC @ 60hz.
The lack of specificity and intermixing of US and EU market(ing), lends me to believe that 'testing' was artificial, and possibly skewed.

Example: an inverter/phase-converter could've been used, and set to the absolute limit of 'US mains'.
(Not impossible that they're REALLY 'playing with words' and used US 208-250VAC @ 60Hz.)
Typically (at least in my limited experience), the higher the mains voltage, the more efficiently SMPS can operate. Which, would make one think they'd prefer to use EU-mains test results...

It's peculiar, to say the least.

 

[R-T-B]

Their wording is lame.

No disagreement was just saying one possible way they could be using the spin-doctored terminology.

 

[AGlezB]

The wonders of marketing photos: the solar panels facing anywhere but the sun.
And don't forget to use the smart app to manage you power before leaving home. You're more likely to have bad or no internet access in a place where you'll need a generator.

 

[user556]

The marketing speak does give way to real facts further down the press release. There is good details there.

 

[MentalAcetylide]

The marketing speak does give way to real facts further down the press release. There is good details there.

Whoever does their marketing obviously doesn't know anything about the product itself and needs to be fired. As someone already pointed out, extreme environments are a no-go. The promo images appear to be more of a mockery of the product than anything else. They mention some "German Red Dot Award"... to me, that could mean "danger", and their website looks like it was designed by a noob working out of their garage... I wouldn't buy one of their units. If they can't get the most basic things right, it would cause me worry about other things such as product support/quality, customer service, etc. It might very well be a good + reliable product, but some of those images are nothing short of moronic( i.e. like who the f*** surrounds their camp like that with glass bulbs???). Are camp fires now deemed to be producing too much carbon & we are now being "encouraged" to sit around a generator in a makeshift Jackery summoning circle instead of a camp fire? We'll just have to start cooking marshmallows on a heater or small grill that of course plugs into the generator...

 

[user556]

It looks fine to me. Lithium Phosphates are definitely the way to go - No fire hazard with them - I still can't believe Boeing didn't use this tech for the 787. Only thing I can think of was the patents were still locking it away when the 787 was being developed. They've expired now.

An actual spec sheet would've been nice though.