- Joined
- Dec 25, 2020
- Messages
- 6,692 (4.69/day)
- Location
- São Paulo, Brazil
| System Name | "Icy Resurrection" |
|---|---|
| Processor | 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition |
| Motherboard | ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE |
| Cooling | Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM |
| Memory | 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V |
| Video Card(s) | ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition |
| Storage | 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD |
| Display(s) | 55-inch LG G3 OLED |
| Case | Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition |
| Power Supply | EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold |
| Mouse | Microsoft Classic Intellimouse |
| Keyboard | Generic PS/2 |
| Software | Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2 |
| Benchmark Scores | I pulled a Qiqi~ |
Did I miss something, when did GPUs with 16 GB of fast VRAM become obsolete? This is fine, it's not the first time AMD has released a Radeon built of top tier silicon scaled back. Cards like the HD 5830, the elusive UA/RU-only 6930, 7870 XT, etc. Nvidia does the same, perhaps the supremely egregious example of this exact same practice: the almighty RTX 4090! Yes, that's right, the AD102 used in the 4090 has 12.5% of its SMs and 25% of its cache disabled.
The purpose behind this is to sell poorly binned chips to a budget conscious Chinese market. That's all it's intended for.