AMD Announces FidelityFX Super Resolution 3 (FSR 3) Fluid Motion Rivaling DLSS 3, Broad Hardware Support

[R0H1T]

How do you know shipping both DLSS & FSR wouldn't make one or both them worse? If AMD paid for DLSS to be removed then yes that is bad though I bet it's pure speculation at this point.

 

[JustBenching]

How do you know shipping both DLSS & FSR wouldn't make one or both worse? If AMD paid for DLSS to be removed then yes that is bad though I bet that's pure speculation at this point.

How would I know that supporting both DLSS and FSR wouldn't cause a nuclear explosion and end the planet? I don't, but there is no reason to believe it would. That's something you literally just made up.

AMD paid the developers to do extra work to REMOVE a feature that's already there. Rofl

 

[R0H1T]

I don't, but there is no reason to believe it would.

So just speculation then?

That's something you literally just made up.

Nope when you add a "feature" to any software, or game, there's every chance it could bork something else.

Admittedly it's a bit of a reach since I don't follow much of this.

 

[AusWolf]

Boundary. The game was in early access and had DLSS. Then AMD sponsored it. I mean it's a UE4 game, adding DLSS is basically a checkbox, the work is already done by epic.

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/125b0ts

Boundary will no longer feature Ray Tracing, ditches DLSS over FSR & XeSS

Even though Surgical Scalpels showcased some really GPU-heavy RT effects for Boundary, the game will not feature any of them at launch.

www.dsogaming.com

Well, fair enough. If it's really because of AMD, it's a shady move... but it's not like Nvidia or Intel hasn't done anything like this in the past, so I still don't see the point here.

Well if you want 1 (fake) fps for every frame in the render pipeline are you really playing a game at that point?

Exactly my point.

 

[Kabouter Plop]

Some people have some crazy fantasy without having any proof, sometimes it just does not work the devs decide using it is not worth it and they find something else.

 

[JustBenching]

So just speculation then?

You are the one speculating. How do you know the world isn't going to end tomorrow? You don't. That doesn't mean you are "speculating" by not believing it will. There is no reason to think dlss doesnt work fine with FSR.

Well, fair enough. If it's really because of AMD, it's a shady move... but it's not like Nvidia or Intel hasn't done anything like this in the past, so I still don't see the point here.

In fact, nvidia hasn't done anything like that in the past, but doesn't matter. We are in agreement that both companies are equally bad, which was my point all along. So we good.

 

[Dr. Dro]

Honestly, I think it's all been covered pretty nicely at this point. It's not like we're against AMD users enjoying frame generation capabilities, just wish that customers were given the final choice and addressing the fan base, that idk maybe next time don't trash talk it, guys. It might end up being your next favorite feature

 

[Legacy-ZA]

FSR3 being able to run on all relatively recent GPUs makes it far more likely that DLSS3 frame generation was locked to Ada for non-technical reasons.

As I said, long ago. Remember G-Sync? ehehe, so many examples of nVidia saying, it's not possible and bam, next driver when AMD does something, they unlock it. nVidia is a scumbag of a company.

 

[Vya Domus]

AMD paid the developers

If we are speculating on these conspiracies might as well throw in my own speculation here and assume Nvidia has to be paying you to litter this forum with your fanboy garbage, no way anyone would be doing this for free.

 

[JustBenching]

If we are speculating on these conspiracies might as well throw in my own speculation here and assume Nvidia has to be paying you to litter this forum with your fanboy garbage, no way anyone would be doing this for free.

There is no conspiracy. The game had DLSS. AMD sponsored it. The devs removed DLSS.

If you can't see it when it's so obvious then I have to assume you are the one being paid here, nobody would sprout forth this garbage for free.

 

[Vya Domus]

There is no conspiracy.

Really dude ? Show me your evidence that "AMD paid the developers to do extra work to remove a feature".

You got their receipts or something ? Bank statements ? Tell us how you did it, we need to know, this is top tier investigative journalism.

 

[Kabouter Plop]

Plot twist they had DLSS2 but it caused crashes and could not fix it then removed it, anyway if NVIDIA makes no mention about it being blocked there is no block, also NVIDIA has standards for how well their tech should work, so they might be the one's blocking it them self due issues with it running up to their standards.

 

[apoklyps3]

Wow, some nvidia fanboys really acting mad now.
The stuff they'll make up to picture nvidia as Saint and amd as the devil is insane.

 

[JustBenching]

Really dude ? Show me your evidence that "AMD paid the developers to do extra work to remove a feature".

You got their receipts or something ? Bank statements ? Tell us how you did it, we need to know, this is top tier investigative journalism.

That's the problem with you cultists. The only way for you to admit amd messed up is by asking people to provide you evidence that...literally cannot be provided.

The writing is on the wall. Game had DLSS, AMD sponsored it, game doesn't have DLSS. How much more obvious can it get, lol

 

[Vya Domus]

That's the problem with you cultists. The only way for you to admit amd messed up is by asking people to provide you evidence that...literally cannot be provided.

Are you dense or something ?

You said "AMD paid them to do X", whatever, show us the proof that they did that. What do you mean the evidence "cannot be provided" ? Of course it can't if it's made up garbage like 99% of the stuff you say on here.

 

[JustBenching]

Wow, some nvidia fanboys really acting made now.
The stuff they'll make up to picture nvidia as Saint and amd as the devil is insane.

That's what an actual fanboy would say. They are both companies trying to make money off of you.

 

[Kabouter Plop]

AMD is better off paying their own driver team more hiring more people for their driver and software team, i doubt they are paying developers to remove NVIDIA features.

 

[apoklyps3]

That's what an actual fanboy would say. They are both companies trying to make money off of you.

I'm a life time nvidia GPU user. Try again

 

[JustBenching]

Are you dense or something ?

You said "AMD paid them to do X", whatever, show us the proof that they did that. What do you mean the evidence "cannot be provided". Of course it can't if it's made up garbage like 99% of the stuff you say on this forum.

There is no amount of evidence that will convince you lad. Even the bank statements you asked for wouldn't convince you.

Game had DLSS. AMD sponsored them. Game removed DLSS. I guess it's just coincidence.

I'm a life time nvidia GPU user. Try again

Try what again?

 

[apoklyps3]

Waking up from the Stockholm syndrome

 

[Vya Domus]

There is no amount of evidence that will convince you

Bro you have ZERO evidence. You said they paid them to do it, go ahead and show one single piece of evidence that they received money from AMD to do that. Just one.

Even the bank statements you asked for wouldn't convince you.

Hey if you have them feel free to prove me wrong. Do you ? You got a man on the inside, how did you do it, come on bro don't let us waiting this is really big.

 

[JustBenching]

Waking up from the Stockholm syndrome

From buying AMD? Yeah, I need to stop it at some point. Can't even play divine divinity on my laptop cause AMD drivers are horrible, have to play it on the desktop that has nvidia. Next time I won't make the same mistake bro, don't worry

 

[apoklyps3]

Bro you have ZERO evidence. You said they paid them to do it, go ahead and show one single piece of evidence that they received money from AMD to do that. Just one.


Hey if you have them feel free to prove me wrong. Did you ? You got a man on the inside, who did you do it, come on bro don't let us waiting this is really big.

He has less than 0 evidence.

From buying AMD? Yeah, I need to stop it at some point. Can't even play divine divinity on my laptop cause AMD drivers are horrible, have to play it on the desktop that has nvidia. Next time I won't make the same mistake bro, don't worry

So you are comparing deskop gpus with laptop gpus now.
Lord have mercy

 

[JustBenching]

Bro you have ZERO evidence. You said they paid them to do it, go ahead and show one single piece of evidence that they received money from AMD to do that. Just one.


Hey if you have them feel free to prove me wrong. Do you ? You got a man on the inside, who did you do it, come on bro don't let us waiting this is really big.

How could a bank statement convince you? Even if AMD came out and admitted that sponsored games have to not support DLSS you still wouldn't be convinced. They might be lying after all.

Again, for the last time, the facts are that the game had DLSS before amd sponsored it, and then they went through the effort of REMOVING dlss after amd sponsored them. Im sure there can be 50 explanations for that, but the most reasonable one is that it has something to do with the sponsorship. Whoever argues otherwise is just doing it on bad faith. And you are full of that when it comes to amd so..

So you are comparing deskop gpus with laptop gpus now.
Lord have mercy

Im comparing drivers. The game is from 2002, every gpu has the horsepower to run it. Unless it's an AMD one of course and the drivers cause flickers and blackscreen and all kind of stuff

 

[Vya Domus]

How

Dude do you have even one piece of evidence to support the claim that AMD paid them do it ?

Yes or no, spare me the block of text.