AMD Unveils Radeon RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT Graphics Cards

[Macro Device]

How do you think - will it be called epic failure or just a failure?

Don't insult failures!

It's just AMD being AMD.

 

[kapone32]

How do you think - will it be called epic failure or just a failure?

View attachment 312173

I don't use RT so it matters not to me what this says. You are also using CP 2077. Like I said let's wait for reviews.

This is what I mean. I know they are doing well in other fields but this one, they are just throwing abandonware at us. They will definitely lose this market segment if RDNA4 will be the same as RDNA3 in terms of generational uplift (meaning 10 percent sharp).

RDNA2 wasn't better than Ampere. Neither is RDNA3. But it's already Ada out there and also Intel pondering upon them. I know Intel's position is currently very weak but they might surprise us. They might not. Who knows. But they're definitely not to be underestimated.

All this just feels like they're not interested in gaming anymore.

Yeah the Ps5 and Xbox certainly give that impression.

 

[ARF]

I don't use RT so it matters not to me what this says.

But it's always good to know that the hardware that you are using is capable. One day every game will include RT in its code from the get-go, and then your Radeon card will be dead useless.
Which is a shame. Because the RT idea is set in stones for at least 10 years, and still AMD ignores its development, of course they will pay the ultimate price - declining sales and threat for the continuation of the brand existence.

 

[kapone32]

But it's always good to know that the hardware that you are using is capable. One day every game will include RT in its code from the get-go, and then your Radeon card will be dead useless.
Which is a shame. Because the RT idea is set in stones for at least 10 years, and still AMD ignores its development, of course they will pay the ultimate price - declining sales and threat for the continuation of the brand existence.

Once again that is your opinion. As much as you think Nvidia is in the Driver's seat the consoles will have a much bigger impact on Gaming than RT. Well I guess my card is still better than any of the 4000 other than the 4090 in RT so that puts a bunch of people in that circle. I get the want for better visuals but before all of these comes the base Game. Would Crysis be so revered if it wasn't a good Game to begin with? Do I play BG3 for RT? What about Amored Core 6? Did I miss RT when playing the hell out of Exoprimal to finish the Campaign in 2 weeks? Am I not pumped for Space Marine 2 without it having to have RT? Is Homeworld 3 going to be unplayable if RT is not enabled? The first thing in the equation is not RT but raster. I have argued for years that Freesync is the best innovation in PC Gaming in a while. Of course it is now an industry standard and called VRR in some circles but that means no tearing or stuttering while Gaming......between 45 and 144 or even 165hz.

BTW my GPU gives me over 200 FPS in CP 2077 without Ray Tracing. Of course I could always turn Vsync on Game at 144hz all day long. It seems to work better with the 7900XT but I did not spend over $1000on a GPU to limit it's performance.

 

[apoklyps3]

But it's always good to know that the hardware that you are using is capable. One day every game will include RT in its code from the get-go, and then your Radeon card will be dead useless.
Which is a shame. Because the RT idea is set in stones for at least 10 years, and still AMD ignores its development, of course they will pay the ultimate price - declining sales and threat for the continuation of the brand existence.

So you were expecting better rt when it was clear it was behind with it with the whole rdna3 series?
It's actually a crime it wins against the 4070 which is 100$ more in some select titles with rt.
"Few more hours before we get the truth" really hit you, bad.
At the same price point with an nvidia product(4060 ti) it destroys it. Not to mention it goes neck to neck with the next tier